On April 6, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
deimos# portupgrade -PR libmpeg2
[Updating the portsdb format:bdb_btree in /usr/ports ... - 16851
port entries found
{lines cut} . done]
[missing key: categories: Cannot read the portsdb!
database file error
{following some ruby errors
Hello,
I'm running 6.2-RELEASE-p2, SMP, x86.
I get the following error when using portupgrade (on every port, not
just this one):
deimos# portupgrade -PR libmpeg2
[Updating the portsdb format:bdb_btree in /usr/ports ... - 16851
port entries found
{lines cut} . done]
[missing key:
deimos# portupgrade -PR libmpeg2
[Updating the portsdb format:bdb_btree in /usr/ports ... - 16851
port entries found
{lines cut} . done]
[missing key: categories: Cannot read the portsdb!
database file error
{following some ruby errors regarding the fact that the db can't be
read?!}
Try
Hello Josh,
Friday, April 6, 2007, 11:08:02 PM, you wrote:
deimos# portupgrade -PR libmpeg2
[Updating the portsdb format:bdb_btree in /usr/ports ... - 16851
port entries found
{lines cut} . done]
[missing key: categories: Cannot read the portsdb!
database file error
{following some
Hello Ghirai,
Friday, April 6, 2007, 11:48:29 PM, you wrote:
Hello Josh,
Friday, April 6, 2007, 11:08:02 PM, you wrote:
deimos# portupgrade -PR libmpeg2
[Updating the portsdb format:bdb_btree in /usr/ports ... - 16851
port entries found
{lines cut} . done]
[missing key: categories:
I just portupgrade'd portupgrade on a FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE to portupgrade
2.0.1 (2006/06/18), and right after this pkgdb fails on all operations,
i.e.:
pkgdb -fu
[Rebuilding the pkgdb format:bdb1_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 63
packages found (-0 +63)
Operation not permitted: skipping...
.
Mon, 19 Jun 2006 14:29:17 +0200, Max Belushkin wrote:
I just portupgrade'd portupgrade on a FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE to
portupgrade 2.0.1 (2006/06/18), and right after this pkgdb fails on
all operations, i.e.:
pkgdb -fu
[Rebuilding the pkgdb format:bdb1_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 63
packages
Andrey Slusar wrote:
Now portupgarde is back to stable 2.1.1 version. Update you ports
tree.
Thank you, this solved the problem.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
For the past month or so I have a couple of ports that will no longer
build on upgrade (graphics/libaux and x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontEncodings)
The precise error is:
== Configuring for libaux-1.0_1
imake -DUseInstalled -I/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config
In file included from Imakefile.c:16:
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 10:57:58PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the past month or so I have a couple of ports that will no longer
build on upgrade (graphics/libaux and x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontEncodings)
OK, this isn't a problem with portupgrade then, it's a problem with
those two ports
||On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 10:57:58PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
||=20
|| For the past month or so I have a couple of ports that will no longer
|| build on upgrade (graphics/libaux and x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontEncodings)
||OK, this isn't a problem with portupgrade then, it's a problem
I get the following when running portversion (or portversion -l '', or
pkgdb, etc)
=[EMAIL PROTECTED] portversion
[Updating the pkgdb format:bdb1_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 45 packages
found (-3 +4) (...)(? portupgrade-20041226).Abort trap (core dumped)
=[EMAIL PROTECTED] pkgdb -F
---
On Thursday 02 September 2004 01:45 am, Philip Payne wrote:
Well, png is up to png-1.2.5_8 and if you did a recent cvsup and
recreated your INDEXs, that is what you should be seeing.
OK, portupgrade(1) _is_ looking for 1.2.5_8 but it is
trying to get it
from
kstewart wrote:
His PACKAGESITE environment variable is set to a wrong location. I think that
he needs to set it using something like
setenv PACKAGESITE
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4-stable/All
Thanks Kent, but it didn't work. Setting it made it search in
On Friday 03 September 2004 11:23 am, Mark Ovens wrote:
kstewart wrote:
His PACKAGESITE environment variable is set to a wrong location. I think
that he needs to set it using something like
setenv PACKAGESITE
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4-stable/All
Thanks
Well, png is up to png-1.2.5_8 and if you did a recent cvsup and
recreated your INDEXs, that is what you should be seeing.
OK, portupgrade(1) _is_ looking for 1.2.5_8 but it is trying to get it
from
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.9-release/All
where the version
On Thursday 02 September 2004 01:45 am, Philip Payne wrote:
Well, png is up to png-1.2.5_8 and if you did a recent cvsup and
recreated your INDEXs, that is what you should be seeing.
OK, portupgrade(1) _is_ looking for 1.2.5_8 but it is trying to get it
from
FreeBSD postie 4.9-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE #1:
Sun Mar 21 19:46:39 GMT 2004
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/POSTIE i386
I'm trying to upgrade cups-base on this system, using packages (as the
machine doesn't really have enough grunt for building ports), with
portupgrade, but it
On Wednesday 01 September 2004 12:41 pm, Mark Ovens wrote:
FreeBSD postie 4.9-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE #1:
Sun Mar 21 19:46:39 GMT 2004
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/POSTIE i386
I'm trying to upgrade cups-base on this system, using packages (as the
machine doesn't really
kstewart wrote:
Well, png is up to png-1.2.5_8 and if you did a recent cvsup and
recreated your INDEXs, that is what you should be seeing.
OK, portupgrade(1) _is_ looking for 1.2.5_8 but it is trying to get it
from
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.9-release/All
where the
On Tuesday 24 August 2004 03:26 pm, LiQuiD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a machine running 4.10 stable that has a problem whenever I try
to run portsdb -Uu. The message the scrolls down the screen is as
follows:
/usr/ports/INDEX:11586:Port info line must consist of 10 fields.
Hi all,
I have a machine running 4.10 stable that has a problem whenever I try
to run portsdb -Uu. The message the scrolls down the screen is as
follows:
/usr/ports/INDEX:11586:Port info line must consist of 10 fields.
That number changes... it basically goes from 0 to that (for all I know)
BSD fans,
I had qmail/courier imapd running fine. I ran portupgrade -ra and after
everyting was upgraded and restarted, my email works fine. but my courier
imapd cannot find my ~/Maildir even though it is there. I look in my logs
and I see that I am getting authenticated with imapd, but all I
finally found the answer..
gotta have MAILDIRPATH=Maildir in /usr/local/etc/courier-imap/imapd
Jason
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I've problem in my box, Yesterday I was try to upgrade port and packages
with this step :
1. Update port tree without X system.
$ cvsup -g -L 2 port-file
2. Backup packages database.
$ cd /var/db
$ cp -rf pkg pkg.old
3. Check all dependecy application.
$pkgdb -F
4. Process
25 matches
Mail list logo