the drive or possibly
the card itself? I suppose the obvious Move it off the raid card is
probably a good first start...
$ uname -a
FreeBSD blackfyre 9.1-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p4 #0: Mon Jun 17
11:42:37 UTC 2013
r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
amd64
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Jason Birch jbi...@jbirch.net wrote:
I should note that `camcontrol rescan 0` (Or `camcontrol rescan all`)
won't find da0.
For those who stumble upon this thread later looking for answers, I'm
almost certain the problem I'm seeing is the same as described in
a check
for negative permissions on the zfs partition) and the second failure was
during a SMART long test, so I guess there's potential for load there.
How might I go about diagnosing whether this is just the drive or possibly
the card itself? I suppose the obvious Move it off the raid card is
probably
Question:
How does the ZFS option 'copies=n' and raid relate to and interact with
each other? specifically recovery in the event of a failure. For
example, is having three disks in a raid-1 configuration with copies=1
effectively the same as having three disks in a raid-0 with copies=3
07.06.2013 18:52, Quartz:
Question:
How does the ZFS option 'copies=n' and raid relate to and interact with
each other? specifically recovery in the event of a failure. For
example, is having three disks in a raid-1 configuration with copies=1
effectively the same as having three disks
In the last episode (Jun 07), Quartz said:
How does the ZFS option 'copies=n' and raid relate to and interact with
each other? specifically recovery in the event of a failure. For
example, is having three disks in a raid-1 configuration with copies=1
effectively the same as having three
My other concern is what happens when one drive goes down if we use
gmirror? Is it completelly transparent
and bad drive can be hot swapped while server is running and rebuild
started?
I am thinking now about gpt+gmirror (including boot and swap)
Artem
Yes. In fact, you can test this by
30.01.2013 1:01, Warren Block:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Artem Kuchin wrote:
29.01.2013 18:57, Warren Block:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Artem Kuchin wrote:
The Handbook chapter on gmirror talks about the problems with GPT
and GEOM metadata. In short: right now, they conflict. It's
possible to
On 01/28/13 21:43, Artem Kuchin wrote:
I am planning to use mirror configuration of two SATA 7200rpm 2TB disks.
I personally vote for gmirror in this case; I've used it a lot and found
it very good wrt to both performance and robustness.
You can spend the extra money you spare on the
30.01.2013 18:06, Warren Block:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Artem Kuchin wrote:
30.01.2013 1:01, Warren Block:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Artem Kuchin wrote:
29.01.2013 18:57, Warren Block:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Artem Kuchin wrote:
The Handbook chapter on gmirror talks about the problems with GPT
On Jan 30, 2013, at 8:10 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
You can spend the extra money you spare on the controller buying good disks;
as someone else pointed out don't get desktop-class ones, but 24x7 ones.
Server Class drives buy you some improvement, but my recent experience with
Seagate
There seems to be one more advantage to gmirror
If i understood correctly
gmirror label -v -b split -s 2048 data da0 da1 da2
will create a tripple mirror raid 1, that is
triple redundancy, which is hardly available on any hardware raid.
Am i correct here?
Also, does anyone know how to choose
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Artem Kuchin wrote:
30.01.2013 18:06, Warren Block:
GPT partitions should work, just limit it to one mirrored partition per
drive.
Please, clarify what you mean here.
If only one GPT partition on a drive is mirrored with another GPT partition
on another drive, head
On Jan 30, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Warren Block wrote:
If you want to use the same drive for booting, it's possible. Create all
three partitions on both drives manually. Then mirror the freebsd-ufs
partition only. The contents of the freebsd-boot partition don't change
often, and swap does
, but if first disk is brain damaged then bios
may just stuck
trying to boot from it and will not pass boot attempt to the second
disk. I don't know, it depends on bios of course. But this seems to be a
disadvantage to
a software raid.
Artem
___
freebsd
, but if first disk is brain
damaged then bios may just stuck trying to boot from it and will not
pass boot attempt to the second disk. I don't know, it depends on bios
of course. But this seems to be a disadvantage to a software raid.
That's true. The similar situation with hardware RAID is when
Good day
I have an old machine that has lost its raid (0/ stripe).
Im trying to fix this.
If I go
[root@torry /usr/home/bclark]# gstripe list
Geom name: st0
State: UP
Status: Total=3, Online=3
Type: AUTOMATIC
Stripesize: 65536
ID: 1006591079
Providers:
1. Name: stripe/st0
Mediasize
29.01.2013 11:54, Michael Powell:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
I guess what I'm trying to point out is that low performance wrt software
RAID will stem from other things besides just simply consuming a few CPU
cycles. Today's CPUs have the cycles to spare. I've been using gmirror for
RAID 1 mirrors
. I hope
to see the same on a software raid.
The controller would be a slight concern. But for what you've described
doing I doubt it will be a big deal. The 3Ware may have a faster processor
on it than say a generic onboard built-in. But since all we're talking here
is a RAID 1 mirror my guess
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Artem Kuchin wrote:
My other concern is what happens when one drive goes down if we use gmirror?
Is it completelly transparent
and bad drive can be hot swapped while server is running and rebuild started?
I am thinking now about gpt+gmirror (including boot and swap)
As
29.01.2013 18:57, Warren Block:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Artem Kuchin wrote:
The Handbook chapter on gmirror talks about the problems with GPT and
GEOM metadata. In short: right now, they conflict. It's possible to
mirror GPT partitions, but be aware that if you mirror more than one
partition
thrash the
heads as mirrors are rebuilt simultaneously.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/geom-mirror.html
Why isn't gmirror more intelligent? I hate to use Linux as an example, but
mdadm won't simultaneously rebuild multiple RAID sets if they use the same
physical
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Artem Kuchin wrote:
29.01.2013 18:57, Warren Block:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Artem Kuchin wrote:
The Handbook chapter on gmirror talks about the problems with GPT and GEOM
metadata. In short: right now, they conflict. It's possible to mirror GPT
partitions, but be aware
Hello!
I have to made a decision on choosing a dedicated server.
The problem i see is that while i can find very affordable and good
options they do not
provide hardware raid or even if they do it is not the best hardware for
freebsd.
The server base conf is 8core 32gb ram 2.8+ ghz.
So, maybe
On 01/28/13 21:43, Artem Kuchin wrote:
Hello!
I have to made a decision on choosing a dedicated server.
The problem i see is that while i can find very affordable and good
options they do not
provide hardware raid or even if they do it is not the best hardware for
freebsd.
The server base
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
On 01/28/13 21:43, Artem Kuchin wrote:
Hello!
I have to made a decision on choosing a dedicated server.
The problem i see is that while i can find very affordable and good
options they do not
provide hardware raid or even if they do
On Jan 28, 2013, at 3:43 PM, Artem Kuchin wrote:
I have to made a decision on choosing a dedicated server.
The problem i see is that while i can find very affordable and good options
they do not
provide hardware raid or even if they do it is not the best hardware for
freebsd.
I prefer SW
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Hello!
I have to made a decision on choosing a dedicated server.
The problem i see is that while i can find very affordable and good
options they do not
provide hardware raid or even if they do it is not the best hardware for
freebsd.
The server base conf is 8core
Does bcm5720 support committed to 9-Stable?
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Sean Bruno sean...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 05:47 -0800, Omer Faruk SEN wrote:
It seems right now only way to go with Rx20 Server models is to use
Intel
cards (dell provides i350 chipset
Hi,
Just tried 9.1-RC3 with R720 which has H710p( the only difference with H710
is 1 gb cache instead of 512mb ). It has recognized both H710p raid as
mfid0 and also network cards are recognized as bgeX (*BCM5720)* but network
cards times out (watchdog timeout) I think it is about
http
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 05:47 -0800, Omer Faruk SEN wrote:
It seems right now only way to go with Rx20 Server models is to use
Intel
cards (dell provides i350 chipset network interfaces as alternative)
The Broadcom 5720 support is in current right now. It will not be in
9.1, but will be
Hi,
Can anyone in this list verify that both RAID controllers are supported on
FreeBSD 8.3 or 9.1
H710 has LSISAS2208 dual-core PowerPC ROC
H310 has LSISAS2008.
I am planning to use these controllers on R420 and R320 Dell Servers. I
would also like to get comments on these two platfoms
Hello,
are there any plans to provide a driver for the supermicro sat2-mv8
(8-port) sata raid card ?
Kind regards,
Dirk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
HI there,
hope my email find you well, i recently order a server with below configuration
INTEL
1x Quad-Core i5-2500 3.3GHz, 6M Cache
16GB DDR3
2x 500GB SATAII
then ask from my COLOCATION to install FreeBSD 8.2 or 8.3 with RAID 1, after
many times of fail in installation from colocation
On 6/22/12 11:11 AM, dude golden wrote:
HI there,
hope my email find you well, i recently order a server with below
configuration
INTEL
1x Quad-Core i5-2500 3.3GHz, 6M Cache
16GB DDR3
2x 500GB SATAII
then ask from my COLOCATION to install FreeBSD 8.2 or 8.3 with RAID 1, after
On 22/06/2012 10:11, dude golden wrote:
INTEL
1x Quad-Core i5-2500 3.3GHz, 6M Cache
16GB DDR3
2x 500GB SATAII
then ask from my COLOCATION to install FreeBSD 8.2 or 8.3 with RAID
1, after many times of fail in installation from colocation they said
that we have problem with RAID 1.we
3.3GHz, 6M Cache
16GB DDR3
2x 500GB SATAII
then ask from my COLOCATION to install FreeBSD 8.2 or 8.3 with RAID 1, after
many times of fail in installation from colocation they said that we have
problem with RAID 1.we suggest them to play with different kind of RAID like
RAID 5 and they said
the system setup menu, the boot menu shows that freebsd90 is the first (and
only) bootable hard drive.
Yet when I try to install FreeBSD 9.0-R, FreeBSD ignores the hardware RAID
and sees the two separate drives, instead of seeing a single logical drive.
good lesson to NEVER use this pseudo
FreeBSD will use a hardware RAID device -only- if the particular type of
RAID chip/chipset/controller is known to the included device drivers.
do not use hardware RAID for such things as this is nothing else
than normal controller and BIOS/driver support
From woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl Sat May 19 06:51:00 2012
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 13:48:18 +0200 (CEST)
From: User Wojtek woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
To: Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, te...@sunset.tx.net
Subject: Re: Optiplex 755 RAID 1
I used 'hardware RAID' because that is -precisely- how the OP described
their equipment.
unfortunately this is true - it is DESCRIBED as such. lie is standard tool
in todays IT marketing.
What are facts:
- very few controllers actually have some RAID support. those usually have
onboard RAM
I created a RAID 1 drive in a Dell Optiplex 755, using the internal RAID
controller and two 160GB drives, naming the logical drive freebsd90.
Within the system setup menu, the boot menu shows that freebsd90 is the
first (and only) bootable hard drive.
Yet when I try to install FreeBSD 9.0-R
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri May 18 15:12:56 2012
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 14:58:26 -0500 (CDT)
From: tess lamont te...@sunset.tx.net
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Optiplex 755 RAID 1 logical drive configuration ignored by FreeBSD
9.0-R installation
I created
On Fri, 18 May 2012, tess lamont wrote:
I created a RAID 1 drive in a Dell Optiplex 755, using the internal RAID
controller and two 160GB drives, naming the logical drive freebsd90. Within
the system setup menu, the boot menu shows that freebsd90 is the first (and
only) bootable hard drive
I have a FreeBSD 9.0 server with an Intel RAID card that has two array
mirrors of which one has failed. The remote host was not responding and
had it reset to find in the RAID utility one of the drives had failed
one of the RAID 1 arrays. Perhaps I shouldn't have, but I told the
utility to use
On 2/10/2012 7:15 AM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
I have a FreeBSD 9.0 server with an Intel RAID card that has two array
mirrors of which one has failed. The remote host was not responding and
had it reset to find in the RAID utility one of the drives had failed
one of the RAID 1 arrays. Perhaps
Does FreeBSD support any type of software raid?
I have an old rack mount server which has 8 bays, but all SATA,
and NO raid. Sure would be nice to have a software raid
to create a NAS device.
--
Jim Pazarena fqu...@paz.bz
___
freebsd-questions
Does FreeBSD support any type of software raid?
I have an old rack mount server which has 8 bays, but all SATA,
and NO raid. Sure would be nice to have a software raid
to create a NAS device.
Yes!
An example of setting up a 3 disk raidz might look like this:
zpool create myfancyraid
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Jim Pazarena wrote:
Does FreeBSD support any type of software raid?
I have an old rack mount server which has 8 bays, but all SATA,
and NO raid. Sure would be nice to have a software raid
to create a NAS device.
Sure, multiple ways, in fact:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc
To whom it may concern:
I have been using the following instructions, I am unable to maintain a
Raid1 installation. I have sent this to the Bug group and programming group
( docs/164620 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=164620cat=docs :
Raid 1 issues) and was told to contact your
A link to the Handbook would be preferable to copying all the
information.
If this is FreeBSD-9.0, then it's due to a GPT/gmirror conflict and a
more particular boot loader.
See the release notes:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.0R/relnotes-detailed.html#AEN1277
On 08.02.2012 6:17, Morris Allen wrote:
I have been using the following instructions, I am unable to maintain a
Raid1 installation. I have sent this to the Bug group and programming group
( docs/164620 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=164620cat=docs :
Raid 1 issues) and was told
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, the wise Polytropon wrote:
Does this image boot successfully?
Unfortunately this is also a no go. I think Intel has done something
special to their iso's, considering that I'm missing 7MB of data.
Regards,
Marco
--
Men have as exaggerated an idea of their
rights as
Hello everyone!
I recently bought a via6421 bulk raid controller and I'm trying to get
journalling working.
I've partitioned it and set up journal with fdisk, bsdlabel and gjournal:
# fdisk -I /dev/ar0
# bsdlabel -w /dev/ar0
# gjournal load
# gjournal label /dev/ar0s1a
# newfs -O 2 -J /dev
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 17:22:57 +0100 (CET), Marco Beishuizen wrote:
After that I tried to create the iso with:
root@yokozuna:/data2/tmp# mkisofs -r -J -b [BOOT]/Bootable_HardDisk.img
-hard-disk-boot -o raid.iso /data2/tmp
which gives an error: mkisofs: No match
First I thought the directory
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, the wise Polytropon wrote:
If this is depending on the name [BOOT], there are
two ways to deal with special characters in file names,
if you need to specify them on the command line:
a) use escape sequences:
-b \[BOOT\]/Bootable_HardDisk.img
b) use quoting:
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 01:11:30 +0100 (CET), Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, the wise Polytropon wrote:
If this is depending on the name [BOOT], there are
two ways to deal with special characters in file names,
if you need to specify them on the command line:
a) use escape
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, the wise Polytropon wrote:
Does this image boot successfully?
I don't know yet because I've used all my cd-r's :-(.
Within a few days I'm expecting some new cd-rw's and I'll let you know how
things went.
If you compare your ISO with the original one, file sizes
should
Hi,
I have an Intel SRCU42X raid controller that currently has firmware
version 414D. The bios flash was done by a system update package, from
Intel which is an iso file that you can burn to a cd. The upgrade to 414D
went fine.
But the newest firmware version is 414I and is not available
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sat Dec 24 23:42:28 2011
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2011 00:38:04 -0500
From: heat...@trans-world.org
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Freebsd installation problem with 3ware 8506-4LP - storage
controller (RAID)
Hello, we tried to instal Freebsd
Hello, we tried to instal Freebsd with my 3ware 8506-4LP - storage
controller (RAID)
and it seems freebsd does not support my raid card could you please
tell me how to fox this problem?
Here below ismy data center message I got after they tried to instal
freebsd on my server,
regards, Miss
Hi,
I recently searched google for FreeBSD software raid because i wanted
to compare the advice google gives me for creating a software raid in
linux and freebsd. First hit here was the link to the handbook page
(18.4). This page still is only talking about ccd and vinum. I know
there is a whole
Leon Meßner wrote:
Hi,
I recently searched google for FreeBSD software raid because i wanted
to compare the advice google gives me for creating a software raid in
linux and freebsd. First hit here was the link to the handbook page
(18.4). This page still is only talking about ccd and vinum
...@horbury.wakefield.sch.ukwrote:
This is probably more PC-specific than freebsd-specific question. I have
intel firmware raid. OS needs drivers to work with it. FreeBSD sees it as
ar0, so it has drivers.
But I want my OS to be installed on this drive and boot from it. It is not
good idea, but I really want
Hello,
This is probably more PC-specific than freebsd-specific question. I have
intel firmware raid. OS needs drivers to work with it. FreeBSD sees it as
ar0, so it has drivers.
But I want my OS to be installed on this drive and boot from it. It is not
good idea, but I really want to do
-specific question. I have
intel firmware raid. OS needs drivers to work with it. FreeBSD sees it as
ar0, so it has drivers.
But I want my OS to be installed on this drive and boot from it. It is not
good idea, but I really want to do it:)
Is it possible?
boot0 and boot1 both work with HDD via
This is probably more PC-specific than freebsd-specific question. I have
intel firmware raid. OS needs drivers to work with it. FreeBSD sees it as
ar0, so it has drivers.
But I want my OS to be installed on this drive and boot from it. It is not
good idea, but I really want to do
:
This is probably more PC-specific than freebsd-specific question. I have
intel firmware raid. OS needs drivers to work with it. FreeBSD sees it as
ar0, so it has drivers.
But I want my OS to be installed on this drive and boot from it. It is
not
good idea, but I really want to do
Hello!
I'm preparing for a migration from single SATA disk attached to
onboard SATA controller to 3ware 9750-4i RAID system. In preparation,
while the system is still running on single disk, I downloaded the
latest tws.ko driver from LSI website and added it to loader.conf:
tws_load=YES
In the last episode (Feb 10), Toomas Aas said:
I'm preparing for a migration from single SATA disk attached to onboard
SATA controller to 3ware 9750-4i RAID system. In preparation, while the
system is still running on single disk, I downloaded the latest tws.ko
driver from LSI website
Hey All,
I'm having an odd issue, and the only thing I can imagine is that there
has been a major change between 8.1 and 8.2.
Using the 8.1 kernel everything is dandy. But when I try to use a newly
compiled kernel from 8.2(GENERIC) I have no luck. Root will not mount.
Here are relevant
On 26-Jan-2011, at 6:26 AM, Don O'Neil wrote:
I'm getting ready to setup a new FreeBSD 8.1 64 bit server and wanted to
know everyone's thoughts on which way to go. software RAID 5 (or 10) or
hardware RAID 5 (or 10).
If you need to select between software and hardware RAID, then by all means
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Don O'Neil li...@lizardhill.com wrote:
I'm just looking for the most stable, and production ready RAID that can
handle at least 1 TB disks and create volumes in the 3-4 TB range. Any
thoughts, feedback, caveats, etc. are welcomed.
ZFS. You want it.
--
chs
I'm getting ready to setup a new FreeBSD 8.1 64 bit server and wanted to
know everyone's thoughts on which way to go. software RAID 5 (or 10) or
hardware RAID 5 (or 10). I currently have a 3Ware card in one of my servers
and it works great, but I haven't really been keeping up on what the latest
We are using 7. We see this in 8 as well. We see it on dual and quad core
CPUs. I'm currently testing out another motherboard (different model) to see
how it performs. Should know something by the end of the coming week.
Troy Beisigl
On Jan 7, 2011, at 9:37 PM, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net
the issues with these controllers and FreeBSD.
Troy Beisigl
Original Message
From: Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net
To: Troy Beisigl t...@i2bnetworks.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Tue, Jan 4, 2011, 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: 9650SE-2LP raid card locks system
On 1/4/2011 11:12 AM, Troy
On 1/7/2011 9:31 PM, Troy Beisigl wrote:
Well, it did lock up today. There is no way to do anything on the console.
The entire machine is locked hard. The errors on the console show:
twa0: ERROR: (0x05: 0x210B): Request timed out!: request = 0xc5633430
twa0: INFO: (0x16: 0x1108):
, 13:32 PM
Subject: Re: 9650SE-2LP raid card locks system
I have a number of these cards and they work very well for us. What
version of the firmware are you using on the card ?
I have this on a busy db server. But its RELENG8.
twa0: 3ware 9000 series Storage Controller port 0x1000-0x10ff mem
On 1/4/2011 11:12 AM, Troy Beisigl wrote:
I will have to check on its next lockup. It happens about every week to
week and a half.
Are you able to force the issue to recreate the problem ?
---Mike
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
So far, no. It just happens. The system is not that loaded. It runs 2
virtually hosted websites with SSL and that is it at the moment.
Troy Beisigl
On Jan 4, 2011, at 8:20 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
On 1/4/2011 11:12 AM, Troy Beisigl wrote:
I will have to check on its next lockup. It happens
Hi,
Could someone please recommend a 2- or 4-channel SAS PCI-e 4x RAID
controller that works with 8-STABLE and is generally available?
Thanks!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
Hi All,
We have been seeing a problem with FreeBSD 7.3 and up where the system
will just hang when using a 9650SE-2LP raid card and 2 500G drives
mirrored. The system will run for about a week and then the filesystem
just hangs, causing the system to hang. We've looked through the logs
card
---Mike
On 1/3/2011 3:58 PM, Troy Beisigl wrote:
Hi All,
We have been seeing a problem with FreeBSD 7.3 and up where the system
will just hang when using a 9650SE-2LP raid card and 2 500G drives
mirrored. The system will run for about a week and then the filesystem
just hangs
Beisigl
Original Message
From: Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net
To: Troy Beisigl t...@i2bnetworks.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Mon, Jan 3, 2011, 13:32 PM
Subject: Re: 9650SE-2LP raid card locks system
I have a number of these cards and they work very well for us. What
version
Original Message
From: Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net
To: Troy Beisigl t...@i2bnetworks.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Mon, Jan 3, 2011, 13:32 PM
Subject: Re: 9650SE-2LP raid card locks system
I have a number of these cards and they work very well for us. What
version
Chip Name: C1064E
Chip Revision: UNUSED
RAID Levels: RAID0, RAID1, RAID1E
RAID0 Stripes: 64K
RAID1E Stripes: 64K
RAID0 Drives/Vol: 2-10
RAID1 Drives/Vol: 2
RAID1E Drives/Vol: 3-10
Now I want to split this mirror into standalone drives but I dont know if its
possible
Hi!
I have a raid problem ... one of the subdisk is missing and i can't
mount my partition.
FreeBSD testhost 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Jul 19 02:36:49
UTC 2010 r...@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
# gvinum printconfig
# Vinum configuration
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
I hope someone can help me installing FreeBSD 8.x with a RAID Controller
from HP or Areca.
We have a HP Proliant DL320 G6 Server with a built in HP Smart Array
Controller. Since we haven't any luck in using the raid controllers from
hp we
On 09/28/10 10:02, Maechler Philippe wrote:
Hello all,
I hope someone can help me installing FreeBSD 8.x with a RAID Controller
from HP or Areca.
and then the machine freezes. This happens on FreeBSD 7.3 - 8.1 (AMD64
and i386).
On FreeBSD 7.2 i386 there is no problem with the areca
Hi there
I would like to install FReebsd with a raid controller card. Can you tell me if
these two cards are supported:
1. Intel RAID Controller SRCSASRB
2. Promise EX 8650
Regards
Kenny
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 11:26:23AM +0200, Kenny du Toit wrote:
Hi there
I would like to install FReebsd with a raid controller card. Can you tell me
if these two cards are supported:
1. Intel RAID Controller SRCSASRB
This should work with the mfi(4) driver, since it uses a 'LSI Logic
I purchased an HP Pavilion p6510f. I cannot boot either FreeBSD 8.1
(amd64) or OpenSUSE 11.3 Gnome Live CD unless I change the hard drive
mode from RAID to IDE. Unfortunately, that damages my Windows 7
installation. (The computer is currently being restored to factory
state
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Andrew Gould andrewlylego...@gmail.comwrote:
I purchased an HP Pavilion p6510f. I cannot boot either FreeBSD 8.1
(amd64) or OpenSUSE 11.3 Gnome Live CD unless I change the hard drive
mode from RAID to IDE. Unfortunately, that damages my Windows 7
...@gmail.com
wrote:
I purchased an HP Pavilion p6510f. I cannot boot either FreeBSD 8.1
(amd64) or OpenSUSE 11.3 Gnome Live CD unless I change the hard drive
mode from RAID to IDE. Unfortunately, that damages my Windows 7
installation. (The computer is currently being restored to factory
This isn't specifically freebsd related but I'm fishing to see if
anyone has observered similar behavior from and Areca raid controller
before. We're already in touch with their support...
Last night a disk failed on a 7 disk raid-6 array on a ARC-1220 with 1TB
WD REmumble disks
Not sure if this is supported..
Looks like the card is an HP Smart Array B110i..
But when setup as raid 0+1 in the bios.. FreeBSD 8.0 amd64 says it can
not find any disks..
Anyone have this working?
Thanks in advance.
___
freebsd-questions
A 3ware raid5 array I had died.
It looks like the data is intact, and there are two good recovery methods:
1) a toolchain from 3ware that, if it doesn't work, will destroy the data.
This method is free, and I can do it myself.
2) professional forensic services. Costs a lot.
I'm going to
Hi--
On May 11, 2010, at 3:35 PM, George Sanders wrote:
[ ... ]
I am planning on attaching each individual member of the raid5 array to a
test FreeBSD system, and run:
dd if=/dev/ad1 of=/data/disk/image.file
Two questions:
- is that a complete 'dd' command, or do I need to specify
Hi,
In the end I had to go with opensuse-11.2. I should have tried it in the
second place really, because the iDRAC has Suse enterprise as an
installation option, so it was a small leap to think of the free
version.
Here are the OSes I tried:
FreeBSD 8
FreeBSD 9
NetBSD 5.0.2
CentOS
Ubuntu 9.10
On 4 April 2010 19:33, John comp.j...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
In the end I had to go with opensuse-11.2. I should have tried it in the
second place really, because the iDRAC has Suse enterprise as an
installation option, so it was a small leap to think of the free
version.
Here are the
1 - 100 of 1849 matches
Mail list logo
