Software RAID performance? RAID-Z or vinum and RAID5?

2009-03-16 Thread Mike Manlief
I'm looking into moving a workstation from Ubuntu 10 to FreeBSD 7.1 (both amd64) and I'm a bit worried about storage -- specifically moving from mdadm, which performs very well for me. Current in Linux I use an mdadm RAID5 of 5 disks. After investigating FreeBSD storage options, RAID-Z sounds

RAID Performance Questions

2007-01-25 Thread Milo Hyson
I don't really have a whole lot of experience with RAID, so I was wondering if the performance figures I'm seeing are normal or if I just need to tweak things a bit. Based on what I've been reading, I would expect more significant improvements over a single drive. Here's my setup: *

Re: RAID Performance Questions

2007-01-25 Thread Martin Hepworth
Milo if you hunt around you should see papers/articles where it shows foe RAID 5 you need at least 5 drives before you any dramatic performance gains..(sun old Sun articles from around 1998 where they do the math as well). not sure about RAID 10, but again I *think* you need at least 3 drives

Re: RAID Performance Questions

2007-01-25 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Jan 25, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Milo Hyson wrote: The write times of both RAID configurations are slower than the single drive (which is expected due to having to write to multiple drives). However, I wasn't expecting such a drastic reduction (about 50%). The read times, although faster, are

Re: RAID Performance Questions

2007-01-25 Thread Milo Hyson
On Jan 25, 2007, at 12:15, Chuck Swiger wrote: Still, you also ought to consider that a 3-disk RAID-5 configuration is very much not ideal from either an efficiency or performance standpoint-- you want more like 5 or 6 drives being used, in which case your performance numbers ought to

Re: RAID Performance Questions

2007-01-25 Thread Jeff Mohler
How about one large raid, and two partitions to serve each purpose? Being so limited in HW, youre either going to take a _huge_ performance hit with only 2 disks per raid (unless Raid0), or an availability hit with everything on one RAID set. But..considering the costs of adding RAID to a

Re: RAID Performance Questions

2007-01-25 Thread Milo Hyson
On Jan 25, 2007, at 13:50, Jeff Mohler wrote: How about one large raid, and two partitions to serve each purpose? Being so limited in HW, youre either going to take a _huge_ performance hit with only 2 disks per raid (unless Raid0), or an availability hit with everything on one RAID set.

Re: RAID Performance Questions

2007-01-25 Thread Ivan Voras
Milo Hyson wrote: I also ran some performance tests with a stock build of PostgreSQL 8.0 to get a different angle on things. Two tests were run on each of the UDMA system drive, the RAID 5 unit, and the RAID 10 unit. The first tested sequential-scans through a 58,000+ record table. The second

Re: [SOLVED] RAID Performance Questions

2007-01-25 Thread Milo Hyson
A quick call to 3ware and they told me to increase vfs.read_max from 8 to 256. That helped. I'm now seeing 4x performance on a four-drive array vs a single drive. Additionally, Ivan was right about the database being too small. iostat showed no disk activity after the initial run, as

Re: degraded RAID performance after OS upgrade, and drives added.

2006-11-30 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Nov 29, 2006, at 6:18 PM, Derrick MacPherson wrote: We updated to 6.1 this weekend and added 3 300gb drives to the external raid cabinet, they were to go on a seprate controller but the server happens to have a few other boxes on top making it impossible at that time, so we put the 3x300

RE: degraded RAID performance after OS upgrade, and drives added.

2006-11-30 Thread Derrick MacPherson
-questions@freebsd.org Sent: 11/30/06 10:39 Subject: Re: degraded RAID performance after OS upgrade, and drives added. On Nov 29, 2006, at 6:18 PM, Derrick MacPherson wrote: We updated to 6.1 this weekend and added 3 300gb drives to the external raid cabinet, they were to go on a seprate

Re: degraded RAID performance after OS upgrade, and drives added.

2006-11-30 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Nov 30, 2006, at 11:40 AM, Derrick MacPherson wrote: That seems like a pretty crazy drop in performance, more than one would expect. The machine is busy but not busy enough to warrant this.. Imo.. Is there a way to test to confirm? Using dd is a trivial benchmark, and not especially

degraded RAID performance after OS upgrade, and drives added.

2006-11-29 Thread Derrick MacPherson
We updated to 6.1 this weekend and added 3 300gb drives to the external raid cabinet, they were to go on a seprate controller but the server happens to have a few other boxes on top making it impossible at that time, so we put the 3x300 (RAID5) , upgraded the OS and performance is very

RAID performance

2004-10-06 Thread Yui Sakazume
Hello, I have installed FreeBSD-4.10 to NEC Express5800 120R. I attached LSI Logic MegaRAID SATA 150-6 with six SATA disks. And configure RAID 5 LUN. But, I/O prformance is poor(about 5MB/s). Is amr suitable for MegaRAID SATA 150-6 ? Please tell me newfs parameters if there is recommendation.

Re: RAID performance

2004-10-06 Thread Mike Woods
Yui Sakazume wrote: Hello, I have installed FreeBSD-4.10 to NEC Express5800 120R. I attached LSI Logic MegaRAID SATA 150-6 with six SATA disks. And configure RAID 5 LUN. But, I/O prformance is poor(about 5MB/s). Is amr suitable for MegaRAID SATA 150-6 ? Please tell me newfs parameters if there is

Mylex RAID Performance

2003-07-02 Thread Nigel Weeks
Has anyone got more than about 5MB/sec out of a Mylex DAC960PD? I have two striped 7200RPM 68-pin wide ultra drives on a channel (each channel supposed to handle 40MB/sec) Having one drive on each channel made no difference. Running the following command resulted in 5MB/sec maximum throughput