At 09:08 AM 11/21/2008, Ansar Mohammed wrote:
Hello all
We are considering using an application that uses FreeBSD web servers in
front of Windows file servers. How reliable/scalable is the kernel SMB
module?
You may want to use FreeNAS which is made for NAS using FreeBSD.
-Derek
--
T
2008/11/21 Ansar Mohammed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I think you are. We should care about a KERNEL module being bug free and
> high performance.
Agreed.
We did a migration from a Windows email server a while back (about 40,000
mail boxes). As customers logged into the FreeBSD boxes, a process was
kic
>
> > We are considering using an application that uses FreeBSD web servers
> in
> > front of Windows file servers. How reliable/scalable is the kernel
> SMB
> > module?
> no idea. it worked many times when i wanted to fetch few files from
> windows. but i don't think anyone really cares very much
We are considering using an application that uses FreeBSD web servers in
front of Windows file servers. How reliable/scalable is the kernel SMB
module?
no idea. it worked many times when i wanted to fetch few files from
windows. but i don't think anyone really cares very much about it being
very
