Re: SAMBA 3.0.28a and CVE-2008-1105

2008-07-02 Thread Timur I. Bakeyev
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 1:20 PM, O. Hartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Johan Hendriks wrote: Konrad Heuer wrote: On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote: We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to CVE-2008-1105 shouldn't it be R3.0.30? As far as I know the mentioned

Re: SAMBA 3.0.28a and CVE-2008-1105

2008-06-20 Thread O. Hartmann
Konrad Heuer wrote: On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote: We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to CVE-2008-1105 shouldn't it be R3.0.30? As far as I know the mentioned security patch gets applied when building Samba from ports. Best regards Konrad Heuer GWDG, Am

RE: SAMBA 3.0.28a and CVE-2008-1105

2008-06-20 Thread Johan Hendriks
Konrad Heuer wrote: On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote: We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to CVE-2008-1105 shouldn't it be R3.0.30? As far as I know the mentioned security patch gets applied when building Samba from ports. Best regards Konrad Heuer

Re: SAMBA 3.0.28a and CVE-2008-1105

2008-06-20 Thread O. Hartmann
Johan Hendriks wrote: Konrad Heuer wrote: On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote: We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to CVE-2008-1105 shouldn't it be R3.0.30? As far as I know the mentioned security patch gets applied when building Samba from ports. Best regards

Re: SAMBA 3.0.28a and CVE-2008-1105

2008-06-19 Thread Konrad Heuer
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote: We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to CVE-2008-1105 shouldn't it be R3.0.30? As far as I know the mentioned security patch gets applied when building Samba from ports. Best regards Konrad Heuer GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077