Re: Samba without Cups ?

2005-07-26 Thread P.U.Kruppa
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Graham Bentley wrote: I just want file sharing, not printing. pkg_add -r samba3 also pulls in cups then my smb log complains ... [2005/07/26 00:31:17, 0] printing/print_cups.c:cups_cache_reload(85) Unable to connect to CUPS server localhost - Connection refused (I havent

Re: Samba without Cups ?

2005-07-26 Thread Joerg Pulz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Graham Bentley wrote: I just want file sharing, not printing. pkg_add -r samba3 also pulls in cups then my smb log complains ... [2005/07/26 00:31:17, 0] printing/print_cups.c:cups_cache_reload(85) Unable to connect to CUPS

Re: Samba without Cups ?

2005-07-26 Thread Alex Zbyslaw
Joerg Pulz wrote: tha package build defaults to build with cups printing support. so if you use the package, you will always get cups installed as a dependency. if you want to entirely remove this dependency you have to build this port from source.and you need to run make config in the ports

RE: Samba without Cups ?

2005-07-26 Thread Norbert Koch
So for samba, you just need to make with WITHOUT_CUPS=1 and samba 3 with WITH_CUPS=0, either on the make line or through pkgtools.conf (portupgrade). I think that's not quite correct. For samba 3 you should just 'make'. WITH_CUPS=0 defines the symbol, and that's what is checked for in the

Re: Samba without Cups ?

2005-07-26 Thread Alex Zbyslaw
Norbert Koch wrote: So for samba, you just need to make with WITHOUT_CUPS=1 and samba 3 with WITH_CUPS=0, either on the make line or through pkgtools.conf (portupgrade). I think that's not quite correct. For samba 3 you should just 'make'. WITH_CUPS=0 defines the symbol, and that's what