From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sun Feb 28 06:00:33 2010
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 11:59:56 +
From: Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
To: Erik Trulsson ertr1...@student.uu.se
Cc: freebsd-questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: selling freebsd cd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/02/2010 01:56:27, Chad Perrin wrote:
Actually, once your project becomes a commercial enterprise, the GPL
stops allowing reference to upstream sources to suit the requirements of
code redistribution. If you sell GPLed software, you have to
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:10:33AM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/02/2010 01:56:27, Chad Perrin wrote:
Actually, once your project becomes a commercial enterprise, the GPL
stops allowing reference to upstream sources to suit the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/02/2010 11:43:42, Erik Trulsson wrote:
The difference is that when you just give a link to a well-known site
you have no guarantees that they will keep the source for that
particular version of the software in question for as long as needed.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 11:10:33 +
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk articulated:
Note that I'm not a lawyer, and this does not constitute legal
advice. My only direct legal advice is to seek legal advice from a
professional.
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:10:33AM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 28/02/2010 01:56:27, Chad Perrin wrote:
Actually, once your project becomes a commercial enterprise, the GPL
stops allowing reference to upstream sources to suit the requirements of
code redistribution. If you sell GPLed
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:59:56AM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 28/02/2010 11:43:42, Erik Trulsson wrote:
The difference is that when you just give a link to a well-known site
you have no guarantees that they will keep the source for that
particular version of the software in question
On 2/27/10 2:58 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27/02/2010 24:50:54, Citra Cool wrote:
can i selling free bsd for my profit??
is it legal??
In a word, yes -- sure you can.
All you have to do is abide by the terms of the licensing.
You sure that
On 02/27/10 12:22, Jon Radel wrote:
On 2/27/10 2:58 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27/02/2010 24:50:54, Citra Cool wrote:
can i selling free bsd for my profit??
is it legal??
In a word, yes -- sure you can.
All you have to do is abide by the
On 2/27/10 1:31 PM, Programmer In Training wrote:
On 02/27/10 12:22, Jon Radel wrote:
On 2/27/10 2:58 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27/02/2010 24:50:54, Citra Cool wrote:
can i selling free bsd for my profit??
is it legal??
In a word, yes --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27/02/2010 18:47:05, Jon Radel wrote:
On 2/27/10 1:31 PM, Programmer In Training wrote:
On 02/27/10 12:22, Jon Radel wrote:
On 2/27/10 2:58 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27/02/2010 24:50:54,
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 07:58:51AM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Some parts of the material in FreeBSD is under GPL, which means
that you have to ensure source code is available for those bits: if
you're redistributing the standard .iso images from the FreeBSD web
sites, you can just point to
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Feb 26 19:15:05 2010
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:50:54 +0700
From: Citra Cool cc.bel...@gmail.com
To: freebsd-questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: selling freebsd cd for profit
can i selling free bsd for my profit??
is it legal??
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27/02/2010 24:50:54, Citra Cool wrote:
can i selling free bsd for my profit??
is it legal??
In a word, yes -- sure you can.
All you have to do is abide by the terms of the licensing.
Primarily, that's the FreeBSD license which says that you
Paul Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030606 19:09]:
If they aren't enthusiastic, it's because it's not solving
any problems for
them. The fact it works great as a high-traffic MX or HTTP
server isn't
something most businesses need. As for desktop use, well,
it does suck
Hi Folks !
Paul Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030606 19:09]:
If they aren't enthusiastic, it's because it's not solving any problems for
them. The fact it works great as a high-traffic MX or HTTP server isn't
something most businesses need. As for desktop use, well, it does suck
compared
Paul Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030606 19:09]:
If they aren't enthusiastic, it's because it's not solving any problems for
them. The fact it works great as a high-traffic MX or HTTP server isn't
something most businesses need. As for desktop use, well, it does suck
compared to something
Evolution is a pretty good drop in replacement for outlook.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Gerard
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 6:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Selling FreeBSD
Paul Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED
Jeff MacDonald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030607 08:35]:
I would question that. I just set my highly non-technical
wife up with
FreeBSD 4.8, KDE 3.1, Mozilla Firebird 0.6 (Linux binary) and
OpenOffice.org 1.0.3 (Linux binary, as mentioned on this
list ;-). It does
require an administrator
19 matches
Mail list logo
