Re: Sysadmin magazine benchmarkings

2004-09-14 Thread peter lageotakes
--- Stefan Cars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > I read the article on sys admin magazine > (http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1148/sam0107a/0107a.htm) > where they > benchmarked Linux, Windows, Solaris and FreeBSD > regarding High-Performance > Network Applications. This article is from 2001

RE: Sysadmin magazine benchmarkings

2004-09-13 Thread JJB
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi! > > I read the article on sys admin magazine > (http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1148/sam0107a/0107a.htm) where they > benchmarked Linux, Windows, Solaris and FreeBSD regarding > High-Performance Network Applications. This article is from 2001 and > covers FreeBSD 4.2

Re: Sysadmin magazine benchmarkings

2004-09-13 Thread Fabian Keil
On Monday 13 September 2004 21:22, Stefan Cars wrote: > I read the article on sys admin magazine > (http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1148/sam0107a/0107a.htm) where they > benchmarked Linux, Windows, Solaris and FreeBSD regarding High-Performance > Network Applications. This article is from 2001 an

Re: Sysadmin magazine benchmarkings

2004-09-13 Thread Bill Moran
Stefan Cars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > I read the article on sys admin magazine > (http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1148/sam0107a/0107a.htm) where they > benchmarked Linux, Windows, Solaris and FreeBSD regarding High-Performance > Network Applications. This article is from 2001 and cover