--- Stefan Cars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I read the article on sys admin magazine
>
(http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1148/sam0107a/0107a.htm)
> where they
> benchmarked Linux, Windows, Solaris and FreeBSD
> regarding High-Performance
> Network Applications. This article is from 2001
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I read the article on sys admin magazine
> (http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1148/sam0107a/0107a.htm) where
they
> benchmarked Linux, Windows, Solaris and FreeBSD regarding
> High-Performance Network Applications. This article is from 2001
and
> covers FreeBSD 4.2
On Monday 13 September 2004 21:22, Stefan Cars wrote:
> I read the article on sys admin magazine
> (http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1148/sam0107a/0107a.htm) where they
> benchmarked Linux, Windows, Solaris and FreeBSD regarding High-Performance
> Network Applications. This article is from 2001 an
Stefan Cars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I read the article on sys admin magazine
> (http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1148/sam0107a/0107a.htm) where they
> benchmarked Linux, Windows, Solaris and FreeBSD regarding High-Performance
> Network Applications. This article is from 2001 and cover