on further tests?
Thanks again
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 June 2004 11:09 PM
To: Dave Raven
Subject: Re: Urgent 4.9 networking problems
try ping -nR -c1 x.y.186.254
If you don't get the same lag then it is your DNS lookup that is
causing
should avoid the delay.
Thanks again
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 June 2004 11:09 PM
To: Dave Raven
Subject: Re: Urgent 4.9 networking problems
try ping -nR -c1 x.y.186.254
If you don't get the same lag then it is your
Your symptoms are typical of DNS time outs.
Ping ip address does no DNS lookups.
Ping freebsd.org will not work either.
With out a lot more detail about your network environment, the best
I can say is look at how your network resolves DNS lookups.
Some times a ISP will change the ip address of
: JJB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 June 2004 11:23 PM
To: Dave Raven; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Urgent 4.9 networking problems
Your symptoms are typical of DNS time outs.
Ping ip address does no DNS lookups.
Ping freebsd.org will not work either.
With out a lot more detail about your
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Dave Raven wrote:
# ifconfig fxp1
fxp1: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
inet x.y.186.3 netmask 0xff00 broadcast x.y.186.255
inet x.y.186.1 netmask 0x broadcast x.y.186.1
inet x.y.186.15 netmask 0x
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Stevens
Sent: 24 June 2004 11:32 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Urgent 4.9 networking problems
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Dave Raven wrote:
# ifconfig fxp1
fxp1: flags=8843UP
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Dave Raven wrote:
The original ip 186.3 sets the broadcast - any aliases after that must
have a /32 broadcast as they are aliases... That's correct isn't it
(rest of list) ?
I don't believe so - it's the netmask which needs to be /32, which you did
correctly. See:
now?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Raven
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 5:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Urgent 4.9 networking problems
I have made further progress - thanks for all your steady replies. I
know it
might look like
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:31:58PM -0700, Kevin Stevens wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Dave Raven wrote:
# ifconfig fxp1
fxp1: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
inet x.y.186.3 netmask 0xff00 broadcast x.y.186.255
inet x.y.186.1 netmask 0x
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:31:58PM -0700, Kevin Stevens wrote:
Err -- no. The broadcast address is a function of the netmask.
Specifically, looking at IPv4 addresses/masks as 32bit integers, the
broadcast address has all ones where ever the netmask
Dave Raven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I can solve the problem with the BIMAP - I'm just interested in
finding out why it has to wait to resolve the host name when I'm telnetting
directly to an ip address and I have no nameservers specified? Surely that
can't be the way it has to be...
11 matches
Mail list logo