RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-11 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter Risdon
 Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 1:32 AM
 To: Ted Mittelstaedt
 Cc: Colin J. Raven; FreeBSD Questions
 Subject: RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.


 
 Surely the easiest way to deal with a horde installation on FreeBSD is
 to install the ports, 

Now, yes.  Then, no - as the versions of the various bits in the ports
had security holes in them.  And also IMP wasn't completely in the
ports dirs when I first started dealing with it.

Ted
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-10 Thread Peter Risdon
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 22:17 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 09:59 +0100, Colin J. Raven wrote:
On Jan 6 at 21:41, Ted Mittelstaedt launched this into the bitstream:
   
Use IMP.
  [...]
  
   Now you mention it, I seem to recall a shedload of issues if you had to
   download the source and build it by hand. There were definite
  gotchas in
   that process I believe.
  
  
 
  How so? It's PHP. There's nothing to build.
 
 
 There were a number of gotchas that were serious EARLIER ON.
 Here's a list of the ones I ran into:

OK, I see what you mean. I was strictly correct and a lot of these
gotchas have nothing to do with IMP, but that's not much help to someone
who actually has to get a working installation of horde/IMP in real
life.

Surely the easiest way to deal with a horde installation on FreeBSD is
to install the ports, so dependencies including the necessary PHP
extensions are pulled in for you, php.ini is updated properly as the
install goes along, paths in config files are correct, program names are
appropriate and so on. then replace scripts and upgrade dependencies
where there are security or feature reasons to do so? And that respect,
installing IMP is no more difficult or problematic than any other
moderately complicated web based application, which is the point I was
trying to make.

I just tried this and got a working horde without any problems. BTW, it
all works fine with courier-imap as well as imap-uw.

Peter.

 
 1) The versions of IMP and Horde in the ports tree were old and had
 security holes thus had to be scratched
 
 2) X Windows is a dependency on one of the subsidiary programs so you
 have to plan your disk partition strategy.
 
 3) IMP's config file used the name wvHtml for the MS Word viewer and
 first time I ran across this I spent at least an hour finding out that
 this program had been renamed wv  (wv requires imagemagic which
 requires X and a great many other programs)
 
 4) IMP looks for user programs (like ispell) in /usr/bin not /usr/local/bin
 
 5) many issues with getting Apache mod-SSL running properly with a
 self-signed
 key  (you have to generate it manually with openssl, the apache docs that
 say use make key or whatnot don't work)
 
 6) There's no list anywhere of what drivers in php IMP needs you have to
 guess.
 (ie: ldap)
 
 7) Using a different imap server than uw-imap might cause trouble with php,
 as that port installs the uw-imap client libraries.
 
 8) All kinds of dumb-ass file naming issues with default config files from
 when php went to php4.  (ie: .php3 to .php)
 
 9) uw-imap that ports installs was old and had security hole
 
 10) php.ini and local.inc in phplib supplied by Horde has wrong pathnames in
 it
 
 11)  php.ini doesen't have extension-imap.so and mysql.so in it
 
 12) Not clear that dirs horde-1.2.3 and imp-2.2.3 need to be renamed
 horde and imp
 
 13) - the instructions place phplib into the document root, and local.inc is
 in there, so a command like:
 
 https://machinename.com/horde/phplib/local.inc
 
 Will open up the local.inc file in all its glory.  You can
 you can move phplib from /usr/local/www/htdocs/horde/phplib to
 /usr/local/www/phplib and change all the references to point to there.
 
 
 Most of these are due to misinterpretaitons of the install docs, which
 exist because the install docs were written by someone who thinks that
 concise writing  is a good thing with instructions.
 
 Ted
 
 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-09 Thread Tabor Kelly
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
snip
Pointless for us, as CAcert's root certificate isn't included in I.E., so
the
end users have to go through the same honky-tonk to include it in their
browsers as if you just make your own certs.
 

Not quite. If they include the CA-Cert root certificate, they only have 
to do that once for all of your CA-Cert signed certificates.

--
Tabor Kelly
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tabor.taborandtashell.net
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-09 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tabor Kelly
 Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 9:39 AM
 To: Ted Mittelstaedt
 Cc: Colin J. Raven; Peter Risdon; FreeBSD Questions
 Subject: Re: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.


 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:

 snip

 Pointless for us, as CAcert's root certificate isn't included in I.E., so
 the
 end users have to go through the same honky-tonk to include it in their
 browsers as if you just make your own certs.
 
 
 Not quite. If they include the CA-Cert root certificate, they only have
 to do that once for all of your CA-Cert signed certificates.


Good point.

Ted

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-08 Thread Colin J. Raven
On Jan 7 at 23:53, Tabor Kelly launched this into the bitstream:
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
snip
5) many issues with getting Apache mod-SSL running properly with a
self-signed
key  (you have to generate it manually with openssl, the apache docs that
say use make key or whatnot don't work)
I am not doubting you that this was an issue. But it is now documented quite 
nicely in the mod_ssl faq (http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.8/ssl_faq.html). Also 
(as a side note), I use CAcert (http://www.cacert.org) for my key signing 
needs.
Good tip, thanks for sharing it
Regards,
-Colin
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-08 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt


 -Original Message-
 From: Tabor Kelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 11:54 PM
 To: Ted Mittelstaedt
 Cc: Peter Risdon; Colin J. Raven; FreeBSD Questions
 Subject: Re: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.


 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:

 snip

  5) many issues with getting Apache mod-SSL running properly with a
  self-signed
  key  (you have to generate it manually with openssl, the apache
 docs that
  say use make key or whatnot don't work)

 I am not doubting you that this was an issue. But it is now documented
 quite nicely in the mod_ssl faq

As I said, gotchas that were serious EARLIER ON.

 (http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.8/ssl_faq.html). Also (as a side note), I
 use CAcert (http://www.cacert.org) for my key signing needs.


Pointless for us, as CAcert's root certificate isn't included in I.E., so
the
end users have to go through the same honky-tonk to include it in their
browsers as if you just make your own certs.

We use self-signed certs for a great many production items - e-mail
webinterface,
account stats, imaps, etc. basically anything that a password would go over.
Never had a customer have a problem inserting our self-signed cert into
their browser, never had any complaints about it either.

Only thing we don't do is take credit card#'s online - not because of the
SSL issues, but because our credit card processing software is so old that
we would either have to pay $500 for an update to it, or the bank requires
us to only take #'s by phone or in person.  So far nobody here has thought
up a good enough reason to pay a bank $500 for new software just to be
able to do this when the old software runs fine.  We kind of feel that since
the bank is saving money by not having to manually process a pack of CC
paper slips, that we shouldn't be the ones paying for software to help
the bank save itself money, you know?  Maybe if it was some other
vendor than a bank

Ted

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-07 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt


 -Original Message-
 From: Peter Risdon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 2:17 AM
 To: Colin J. Raven
 Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt; FreeBSD Questions
 Subject: RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.


 On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 11:12 +0100, Colin J. Raven wrote:
  On Jan 7 at 09:41, Peter Risdon launched this into the bitstream:
 
   On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 09:59 +0100, Colin J. Raven wrote:
   On Jan 6 at 21:41, Ted Mittelstaedt launched this into the bitstream:
  
   Use IMP.
 [...]
 
  Now you mention it, I seem to recall a shedload of issues if you had to
  download the source and build it by hand. There were definite
 gotchas in
  that process I believe.
 
 

 How so? It's PHP. There's nothing to build.


There were a number of gotchas that were serious EARLIER ON.
Here's a list of the ones I ran into:

1) The versions of IMP and Horde in the ports tree were old and had
security holes thus had to be scratched

2) X Windows is a dependency on one of the subsidiary programs so you
have to plan your disk partition strategy.

3) IMP's config file used the name wvHtml for the MS Word viewer and
first time I ran across this I spent at least an hour finding out that
this program had been renamed wv  (wv requires imagemagic which
requires X and a great many other programs)

4) IMP looks for user programs (like ispell) in /usr/bin not /usr/local/bin

5) many issues with getting Apache mod-SSL running properly with a
self-signed
key  (you have to generate it manually with openssl, the apache docs that
say use make key or whatnot don't work)

6) There's no list anywhere of what drivers in php IMP needs you have to
guess.
(ie: ldap)

7) Using a different imap server than uw-imap might cause trouble with php,
as that port installs the uw-imap client libraries.

8) All kinds of dumb-ass file naming issues with default config files from
when php went to php4.  (ie: .php3 to .php)

9) uw-imap that ports installs was old and had security hole

10) php.ini and local.inc in phplib supplied by Horde has wrong pathnames in
it

11)  php.ini doesen't have extension-imap.so and mysql.so in it

12) Not clear that dirs horde-1.2.3 and imp-2.2.3 need to be renamed
horde and imp

13) - the instructions place phplib into the document root, and local.inc is
in there, so a command like:

https://machinename.com/horde/phplib/local.inc

Will open up the local.inc file in all itÂ’s glory.  You can
you can move phplib from /usr/local/www/htdocs/horde/phplib to
/usr/local/www/phplib and change all the references to point to there.


Most of these are due to misinterpretaitons of the install docs, which
exist because the install docs were written by someone who thinks that
concise writing  is a good thing with instructions.

Ted

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-07 Thread Tabor Kelly
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
snip
5) many issues with getting Apache mod-SSL running properly with a
self-signed
key  (you have to generate it manually with openssl, the apache docs that
say use make key or whatnot don't work)
I am not doubting you that this was an issue. But it is now documented 
quite nicely in the mod_ssl faq 
(http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.8/ssl_faq.html). Also (as a side note), I 
use CAcert (http://www.cacert.org) for my key signing needs.

--
Tabor Kelly
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tabor.taborandtashell.net
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-07 Thread Colin J. Raven
On Jan 6 at 21:41, Ted Mittelstaedt launched this into the bitstream:
Use IMP.  Of course, some people pooh-pooh it saying it's hard
to setup.  However, IMP is one of those programs that is worth
the effort, as if you install the entire suite of programs you
have a very powerful front end mail system.
IMP is what we use and if you want my notes from the last installation
your welcome to them.
Like others, I'd heard of the installation difficulties you made 
reference to. I'm at something of a crossroads moment right now as it 
relates to webmail, so this thread is well timed. I *was* gonna simply 
install Squirrelmail since I know it and use it elsewhere. Now perhaps 
is the time to look at an alternative. I'd welcome your IMP installation 
notes!

I *gather* (not in front of a FreeBSD box at this moment) that IMP is 
*not* in ports, otherwise (surely) installation wouldn't be *that* 
complex? Configging maybe, but install-wise ports 'apps just; slide 
right in there - usually :-)

/me is keenly anticipating install notes!! Thanks for that Ted!
Regards,
-Colin
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-07 Thread Jorn Argelo
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:41:50 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote
 Use IMP.  Of course, some people pooh-pooh it saying it's hard
 to setup.  However, IMP is one of those programs that is worth
 the effort, as if you install the entire suite of programs you
 have a very powerful front end mail system.

True enough, but I never managed to get it up and running. It's a very nice 
suite indeed, if you can get it running.

I'm using Open Webmail. A powerful webmail client based on Neomail. It uses 
speedycgi, and requires suid to be compiled in your perl enviroment. You 
probably have to recomple perl, but it's still alot easier then IMP.

Jorn.

 
 IMP is what we use and if you want my notes from the last 
 installation your welcome to them.
 
 Ted
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rene C. Mendoza
  Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 6:10 PM
  To: freebsd-questions
  Subject: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.
  
  
  I'm in the process of looking for a webmail frontend to my Postfix mail 
  server setup installed on FreeBSD 5.3.  I use cyrus-imap as well.  What 
  would you recommend?  I've heard of Squirrel Mail and IMP, but I don't 
  know what to choose.
  
  thanks,
  Rene
  
  ___
  freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-07 Thread Peter Risdon
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 09:59 +0100, Colin J. Raven wrote:
 On Jan 6 at 21:41, Ted Mittelstaedt launched this into the bitstream:
 
  Use IMP.  Of course, some people pooh-pooh it saying it's hard
  to setup.  However, IMP is one of those programs that is worth
  the effort, as if you install the entire suite of programs you
  have a very powerful front end mail system.
 
  IMP is what we use and if you want my notes from the last installation
  your welcome to them.
 
 
 Like others, I'd heard of the installation difficulties you made 
 reference to. I'm at something of a crossroads moment right now as it 
 relates to webmail, so this thread is well timed. I *was* gonna simply 
 install Squirrelmail since I know it and use it elsewhere. Now perhaps 
 is the time to look at an alternative. I'd welcome your IMP installation 
 notes!
 
 I *gather* (not in front of a FreeBSD box at this moment) that IMP is 
 *not* in ports, otherwise (surely) installation wouldn't be *that* 
 complex? Configging maybe, but install-wise ports 'apps just; slide 
 right in there - usually :-)

I'm baffled by all this. IMP is easy to install and set up. It is in the
ports tree, together with several other useful horde components:

From /usr/ports/www/horde2/pkg-descr:

Horde is used by these ports: mail/imp3, mail/turba, devel/chora,
deskutils/kronolith, deskutils/nag, www/jonah, net/nic, devel/whups,
and deskutils/mnemo

Horde applications have an intuitive folder structure, clearly
identified config files and, the dozen or so times I've had to set this
up, it's always just worked first time.

Peter.



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-07 Thread Colin J. Raven
On Jan 7 at 09:41, Peter Risdon launched this into the bitstream:
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 09:59 +0100, Colin J. Raven wrote:
On Jan 6 at 21:41, Ted Mittelstaedt launched this into the bitstream:
Use IMP.  Of course, some people pooh-pooh it saying it's hard
to setup.  However, IMP is one of those programs that is worth
the effort, as if you install the entire suite of programs you
have a very powerful front end mail system.
I *gather* (not in front of a FreeBSD box at this moment) that IMP is
*not* in ports, otherwise (surely) installation wouldn't be *that*
complex? Configging maybe, but install-wise ports 'apps just; slide
right in there - usually :-)
I'm baffled by all this. IMP is easy to install and set up. It is in the
ports tree, together with several other useful horde components:
From /usr/ports/www/horde2/pkg-descr:
Horde is used by these ports: mail/imp3, mail/turba, devel/chora,
deskutils/kronolith, deskutils/nag, www/jonah, net/nic, devel/whups,
and deskutils/mnemo
Horde applications have an intuitive folder structure, clearly
identified config files and, the dozen or so times I've had to set this
up, it's always just worked first time.
I think the difficulties arise where there is no application 
distribution mechanism such as ports.

Now you mention it, I seem to recall a shedload of issues if you had to 
download the source and build it by hand. There were definite gotchas in 
that process I believe.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-07 Thread Peter Risdon
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 11:12 +0100, Colin J. Raven wrote:
 On Jan 7 at 09:41, Peter Risdon launched this into the bitstream:
 
  On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 09:59 +0100, Colin J. Raven wrote:
  On Jan 6 at 21:41, Ted Mittelstaedt launched this into the bitstream:
 
  Use IMP. 
[...]
 
 Now you mention it, I seem to recall a shedload of issues if you had to 
 download the source and build it by hand. There were definite gotchas in 
 that process I believe.
 
 

How so? It's PHP. There's nothing to build.

Peter.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-06 Thread Gregor Mosheh
Three companies I know of use Squirrel: my work, my
friend's colo, and the last ISP where I worked.
They're all very fond of it, as am I. It does require
IMAP, but so does IMP.

At my friend's colo he also tried IMP but decided
against it because installation was more complicated
than Squirrel. I wasn't part of that project, so I
can't say what his issues were.


--- Rene C. Mendoza
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm in the process of looking for a webmail frontend
 to my Postfix mail 
 server setup installed on FreeBSD 5.3.  I use
 cyrus-imap as well.  What 
 would you recommend?  I've heard of Squirrel Mail
 and IMP, but I don't 
 know what to choose.




__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
http://my.yahoo.com 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-06 Thread whitevamp
i use openwebmail  i found it easer to setup then squarlmail
- Original Message - 
From: Rene C. Mendoza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 6:10 PM
Subject: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.


I'm in the process of looking for a webmail frontend to my Postfix mail 
server setup installed on FreeBSD 5.3.  I use cyrus-imap as well.  What 
would you recommend?  I've heard of Squirrel Mail and IMP, but I don't 
know what to choose.

thanks,
Rene
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-06 Thread Tabor Kelly
Rene C. Mendoza wrote:
I'm in the process of looking for a webmail frontend to my Postfix mail 
server setup installed on FreeBSD 5.3.  I use cyrus-imap as well.  What 
would you recommend?  I've heard of Squirrel Mail and IMP, but I don't 
know what to choose.

thanks,
Rene
I used IMP a few years ago, and I found it complicated to set up. I use 
SqWebMail now. SqWebMail may be less elegant than SquirrelMail, but 
SqWebMail is far more efficient. It is written in C, and accesses 
Maildirs locally, not through an IMAP server. If Postfix does not 
support Maildirs, you couldn't use SqWebMail.

I have written a short tutorial on how to set up SqWebMail here (it is 
draft quality now): 
http://tabor.taborandtashell.net/serversetup/sqwebmail.html The 
installation is pretty straight forward (it is in ports), except the 
Makefile, which is a little confusing at first.

--
Tabor Kelly
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tabor.taborandtashell.net
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.

2005-01-06 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
Use IMP.  Of course, some people pooh-pooh it saying it's hard
to setup.  However, IMP is one of those programs that is worth
the effort, as if you install the entire suite of programs you
have a very powerful front end mail system.

IMP is what we use and if you want my notes from the last installation
your welcome to them.

Ted

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rene C. Mendoza
 Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 6:10 PM
 To: freebsd-questions
 Subject: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes.
 
 
 I'm in the process of looking for a webmail frontend to my Postfix mail 
 server setup installed on FreeBSD 5.3.  I use cyrus-imap as well.  What 
 would you recommend?  I've heard of Squirrel Mail and IMP, but I don't 
 know what to choose.
 
 thanks,
 Rene
 
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]