At 2004-06-12T14:06:07+01:00, Matthew Seaman wrote:
For more detail that you could possibly want about the descent of
Unix, see:
http://www.levenez.com/unix/
Hi Matthew,
Thanks for pointing out that interesting site.
Cheers,
Raghavendra.
--
N. Raghavendra [EMAIL PROTECTED] | See
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Grauwmans Steven (gs) writes:
gs If U could please help me, I'm getting confused.
Linux is a kernel, ie the bit of the OS which needs to be there, but
you should never be aware of in normal use if it works properly.
Unix is a trademark. There used to be an OS
Grauwmans Steven wrote:
Linux is UNIX, but why is Fedora Core a Linux and FreeBSD a UNIX?
I searched on the internet for an answer, but after visiting 10 sites I
gave up.
If U could please help me, I'm getting confused.
Linux is a kernel. Fedora uses this kernel, and therefore is a Linux
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 10:06:49AM +0200, Grauwmans Steven wrote:
Linux is UNIX, but why is Fedora Core a Linux and FreeBSD a UNIX?
I searched on the internet for an answer, but after visiting 10 sites I
gave up.
If U could please help me, I'm getting confused.
Because FreeBSD code is derived
This is a hard one to answer. Most people disagree slightly on this
question. It all depends on your perspective. If you go by companies that
are allowed to use the UNIX copyright, then only IBM AIX and Sun Solaris are
UNIX. If you go by the posix specification, then most operating systems can
