'; Jonathan Chen; Arnason, Arni;
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: upgrade named
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 08:13:07 -0500
Arnason, Arni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
8.3.3 is in /usr/sbin
9 went into /usr/local/sbin
modified rc.conf to point to the
new binary
named_program=/usr/local/sbin/named
but I'm
any ideas?
Arni
-Original Message-
From: Wes Zuber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 05 November, 2003 14:46
To: Jonathan Chen
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Arnason, Arni
Subject: Re: upgrade named
We had the same issue. The named binary on our 8.3.3 set up was in
/usr/local/bin
]'; Arnason, Arni
Subject: Re: upgrade named
We had the same issue. The named binary on our 8.3.3 set up was in
/usr/local/bin When we installed 9 that went into /usr/sbin
I suspect that you are just calling the old binary.
--Wes
On Nov 5, 2003, at 11:35 AM, Jonathan Chen wrote
: upgrade named
We had the same issue. The named binary on our 8.3.3 set up was in
/usr/local/bin When we installed 9 that went into /usr/sbin
I suspect that you are just calling the old binary.
--Wes
On Nov 5, 2003, at 11:35 AM, Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:38
I've been trying to upgrade named to version 9
but seem to be missing something
Currently have: FreeBSD 4.6.2 with named 8.3.3
downloaded, configured and installed version 9 - updated rc.conf to
point to the new location, rebooted and I'm still running 8.3.3
Try make
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:38:55AM -0500, Arnason, Arni wrote:
I've been trying to upgrade named to version 9
but seem to be missing something
Currently have: FreeBSD 4.6.2 with named 8.3.3
downloaded, configured and installed version 9 - updated rc.conf to
point to
We had the same issue. The named binary on our 8.3.3 set up was in
/usr/local/bin When we installed 9 that went into /usr/sbin
I suspect that you are just calling the old binary.
--Wes
On Nov 5, 2003, at 11:35 AM, Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:38:55AM -0500, Arnason, Arni
