Re: Is this a good or a bad idea to delete all off this ?
Gert Cuykens wrote: can i do controle C when i want to go to sleep while upgrading ? A cleaner solution, regardless of whatever you're running that you'd like to ^c, is to just let it run inside a screen session and reattach to the screen session later to see how it went. Screen should be every sysadmin's best friend. =) Tom ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: Is this a good or a bad idea to delete all off this ?
Gert Cuykens wrote: can i do controle C when i want to go to sleep while upgrading ? A cleaner solution, regardless of whatever you're running that you'd like to ^c, is to just let it run inside a screen session and reattach to the screen session later to see how it went. Screen should be every sysadmin's best friend. =) What exactly is a screen session? /Brian ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is this a good or a bad idea to delete all off this ?
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 06:17 am, Tom Trelvik wrote: Gert Cuykens wrote: can i do controle C when i want to go to sleep while upgrading ? A cleaner solution, regardless of whatever you're running that you'd like to ^c, is to just let it run inside a screen session and reattach to the screen session later to see how it went. Screen should be every sysadmin's best friend. =) Tom Tom, mind providing a link that tells us non-sysadmins how to do this? Thank you, -Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is this a good or a bad idea to delete all off this ?
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote: On Tuesday 15 March 2005 06:17 am, Tom Trelvik wrote: Gert Cuykens wrote: can i do controle C when i want to go to sleep while upgrading ? A cleaner solution, regardless of whatever you're running that you'd like to ^c, is to just let it run inside a screen session and reattach to the screen session later to see how it went. Screen should be every sysadmin's best friend. =) Tom Tom, mind providing a link that tells us non-sysadmins how to do this? He's referring to the misc/screen port. The man page is pretty comprehensive. It basically gives you virtual terminal sessions that you can attach, detach and reattach a client to without disturbing the underlying session. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287864 or +44 (0)117 9287088 http://ioctl.org/jan/ Random act of violence against bread: whole pint. -- extract from the Hawk the Slayer drinking game ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is this a good or a bad idea to delete all off this ?
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 06:45:24 -0800, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 15 March 2005 06:17 am, Tom Trelvik wrote: Gert Cuykens wrote: can i do controle C when i want to go to sleep while upgrading ? A cleaner solution, regardless of whatever you're running that you'd like to ^c, is to just let it run inside a screen session and reattach to the screen session later to see how it went. Screen should be every sysadmin's best friend. =) Tom Tom, mind providing a link that tells us non-sysadmins how to do this? Thank you, -Mike You might find this helpful. Screen is very useful. http://www.samag.com/documents/s=9142/sam0405f/ Chris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is this a good or a bad idea to delete all off this ?
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 07:02 am, Chris Hodgins wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 06:45:24 -0800, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 15 March 2005 06:17 am, Tom Trelvik wrote: Gert Cuykens wrote: can i do controle C when i want to go to sleep while upgrading ? A cleaner solution, regardless of whatever you're running that you'd like to ^c, is to just let it run inside a screen session and reattach to the screen session later to see how it went. Screen should be every sysadmin's best friend. =) Tom Tom, mind providing a link that tells us non-sysadmins how to do this? Thank you, -Mike You might find this helpful. Screen is very useful. http://www.samag.com/documents/s=9142/sam0405f/ Chris Thanks. Just read over the site/bookmarked it, very good information! -Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is this a good or a bad idea to delete all off this ?
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 07:02 am, Jan Grant wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote: On Tuesday 15 March 2005 06:17 am, Tom Trelvik wrote: Gert Cuykens wrote: can i do controle C when i want to go to sleep while upgrading ? A cleaner solution, regardless of whatever you're running that you'd like to ^c, is to just let it run inside a screen session and reattach to the screen session later to see how it went. Screen should be every sysadmin's best friend. =) Tom Tom, mind providing a link that tells us non-sysadmins how to do this? He's referring to the misc/screen port. The man page is pretty comprehensive. It basically gives you virtual terminal sessions that you can attach, detach and reattach a client to without disturbing the underlying session. Thanks Jan for the port name. Chris Hodgins just provided a good link with information about screen, it is nice to know the portname as well. :) -Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is this a good or a bad idea to delete all off this ?
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:21:50 -0800, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 14 March 2005 04:06 pm, Gert Cuykens wrote: Is this a good or a bad idea to delete all off this ? portmanager -sl xorg-fontserver-6.7.0 dir -= /usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-fontserver COMMENT=X font server from X.Org xorg-fonts-type1-6.7.0 dir -= /usr/ports/x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-type1 COMMENT=X.Org Type1 fonts xorg-fonts-cyrillic-6.7.0 dir -= /usr/ports/x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-cyrillic COMMENT=X.Org Cyrillic bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-100dpi-6.7.0 dir -= /usr/ports/x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-100dpi COMMENT=X.Org 100dpi bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-75dpi-6.7.0 dir -= /usr/ports/x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-75dpi COMMENT=X.Org 75dpi bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-miscbitmaps-6.7.0 dir -= /usr/ports/x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-miscbitmapsCOMMENT=X.Org miscellaneous bitmap fonts xorg-vfbserver-6.7.0 dir -= /usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-vfbserver COMMENT=X virtual framebuffer server from X.Org xorg-printserver-6.7.0 dir -= /usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-printserver COMMENT=X Print server from X.Org xorg-nestserver-6.7.0 dir -= /usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-nestserver COMMENT=Nesting X server from X.Org xorg-server-6.7.0_9 dir -= /usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-server COMMENT=X.Org X server and related programs xorg-manpages-6.7.0 dir -= /usr/ports/x11/xorg-manpages COMMENT=X.Org library manual pages xorg-clients-6.7.0_5 dir -= /usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients COMMENT=X client programs and related files from X.Org Gert, nothing you have installed has those ports listed as run dependencies so technically you may delete them all. But to be safe, do run portmanager -u right afterwards and see if any other ports cause them to be pulled back in. Likely some of the fonts and xorg-clients will be pulled back in by another port. -Mike ok i deleted them i now have a new one i like to delete :) Ports with no ports depending on them AKA leaf ports. These ports may be safely deinstalled because no other ports list these as dependencies. xorg-server-6.7.0_9 /usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-server This package contains the X.Org X server and some associated programs. WWW: http://www.freedesktop.org/Software/xorg - Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPACEENTER to skip XENTER removes port NENTER *Nuke it*, removes distribution files Are you sure its a leaf port ? Because i have gnome2-lite running ? Is gnome still going to work if i nuke this ? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is this a good or a bad idea to delete all off this ?
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:46:59 -0800, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't NUKE it, just X it. Then run portmanager -u before you exit gnome. If gnome needs it it portmanager -u will bring it back. In a worst case scenerio you can run portmanager -u from the consol. Personally I think your asking for trouble by deleting anything with xorg in its name, only do this if space is critical. Its more like time critical while uprading and compiling all of this :) PS is portmamager -u going to make a mess of my gnome ? I# portmanager -s PMGRrStatus 0.2.9_2 info: Creating inital data bases PMGRrStatus 0.2.9_2 info: looking for missing dependent ports -=MISSING=- eel2-2.8.2[/x11-toolkits/eel2] may be a dependency of nautilus2-2.8.2_1 verifing dependency status of eel2-2.8.2 (may take awhile) by executing command:cd /usr/ports/x11-fm/nautilus2; make all-depends-list * * * * eel2-2.8.2 is no longer a dependency of nautilus2-2.8.2_1 forcing rebuild of nautilus2-2.8.2_1 to fix /var/db/pkg/nautilus2-2.8.2_1/+CONTENTS file. * * * * WARNING: eel2-2.8.2 may conflict with a new nautilus2-2.8.2_1 dependency and may have to be manually removed with pkg_delete -f eel2-2.8.2. If portmanager fails during rebuild of nautilus2-2.8.2_1 then review /usr/ports/UPDATING and also note what is at the bottom of /usr/ports/MOVED. -=MISSING=- eel2-2.8.2[/x11-toolkits/eel2] may be a dependency of gnomecontrolcenter2-2.8.1_1 verifing dependency status of eel2-2.8.2 (may take awhile) by executing command:cd /usr/ports/sysutils/gnomecontrolcenter2; make all-depends-list * * * * eel2-2.8.2 is no longer a dependency of gnomecontrolcenter2-2.8.1_1 forcing rebuild of gnomecontrolcenter2-2.8.1_1 to fix /var/db/pkg/gnomecontrolcenter2-2.8.1_1/+CONTENTS file. * * * * WARNING: eel2-2.8.2 may conflict with a new gnomecontrolcenter2-2.8.1_1 dependency and may have to be manually removed with pkg_delete -f eel2-2.8.2. If portmanager fails during rebuild of gnomecontrolcenter2-2.8.1_1 then review /usr/ports/UPDATING and also note what is at the bottom of /usr/ports/MOVED. -=MISSING=- eel2-2.8.2[/x11-toolkits/eel2] may be a dependency of gedit2-2.8.2verifing dependency status of eel2-2.8.2 (may take awhile) by executing command:cd /usr/ports/editors/gedit; make all-depends-list * * * * eel2-2.8.2 is no longer a dependency of gedit2-2.8.2 forcing rebuild of gedit2-2.8.2 to fix /var/db/pkg/gedit2-2.8.2/+CONTENTS file. * * * * WARNING: eel2-2.8.2 may conflict with a new gedit2-2.8.2 dependency and may have to be manually removed with pkg_delete -f eel2-2.8.2. If portmanager fails during rebuild of gedit2-2.8.2 then review /usr/ports/UPDATING and also note what is at the bottom of /usr/ports/MOVED. -=MISSING=- eel2-2.8.2[/x11-toolkits/eel2] may be a dependency of gnome2-lite-2.8.1 verifing dependency status of eel2-2.8.2 (may take awhile) by executing command:cd /usr/ports/x11/gnome2-lite; make all-depends-list * * * * eel2-2.8.2 is no longer a dependency of gnome2-lite-2.8.1 forcing rebuild of gnome2-lite-2.8.1 to fix /var/db/pkg/gnome2-lite-2.8.1/+CONTENTS file. * * * * WARNING: eel2-2.8.2 may conflict with a new gnome2-lite-2.8.1 dependency and may have to be manually removed with pkg_delete -f eel2-2.8.2. If portmanager fails during rebuild of gnome2-lite-2.8.1 then review /usr/ports/UPDATING and also note what is at the bottom of /usr/ports/MOVED. -=MISSING=- ggv2-2.8.1[/print/ggv2] may be a dependency of gnome2-lite-2.8.1 verifing dependency status of ggv2-2.8.1 (may take awhile) by executing command:cd /usr/ports/x11/gnome2-lite; make all-depends-list * * * * ggv2-2.8.1 is no longer a dependency of gnome2-lite-2.8.1 forcing rebuild of gnome2-lite-2.8.1 to fix /var/db/pkg/gnome2-lite-2.8.1/+CONTENTS file. * * * * WARNING: ggv2-2.8.1 may conflict with a new gnome2-lite-2.8.1 dependency and may have to be manually removed with pkg_delete -f ggv2-2.8.1. If portmanager fails during rebuild of gnome2-lite-2.8.1 then review /usr/ports/UPDATING and also note what is at the bottom of /usr/ports/MOVED. -=MISSING=- nautilus-media-0.8.1[/multimedia/nautilus-media] may be a dependency of gnome2-lite-2.8.1 verifing dependency status of nautilus-media-0.8.1 (may
Re: Is this a good or a bad idea to delete all off this ?
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:10:01 -0800, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In your case you should get your ports up to date with portmanager -u before you worry about deleting leaves. because gnome was just upgraded it may take a day or two for everything to be brought up to date. Seeing the output below I say you desperately need to update these ports before doing anything else. can i do controle C when i want to go to sleep while upgrading ? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is this a good or a bad idea to delete all off this ?
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:20:46 -0800, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 14 March 2005 05:15 pm, Gert Cuykens wrote: On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:10:01 -0800, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In your case you should get your ports up to date with portmanager -u before you worry about deleting leaves. because gnome was just upgraded it may take a day or two for everything to be brought up to date. Seeing the output below I say you desperately need to update these ports before doing anything else. can i do controle C when i want to go to sleep while upgrading ? You sure can. portmanager is designed to be started/stopped anytime. Maybe you don't want to exit out of anything though in gnome until everthing is upgraded. Right now libraries are in memory but if you exit say X then when you restart X all of the libraries need to be reloaded and if you were in the middle of upgrading them things will get ugly. In other words, don't shut off your system until it is done and don't exit out of gnome for the same reason. -Mike ok thx :) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
