Re[2]: ZendOptimizer and libm.so.2?

2006-10-03 Thread Daniel Gerzo 
Hello Mark,

Wednesday, October 4, 2006, 12:22:28 AM, you wrote:

  Which leads me to believe I'm correct in thinking Zend 
  Optimizer really just needs libm.so.2, right?
 
 You're better off installing the misc/compat4x port to get libm.so.2 .

 No, I *have* libm.so.2 (FreeBSD 4.11); The port for Zend Optimizer

You should be better with not having such an ancient system :-)

And now seriously, its End Of Life (i.e. support from security team)
is sheduled on January 31th 2007.

 said it needed libm.so.3, but from what I read, I really think libm.so.2
 suffices.

 - Mark

-- 
Best regards,
 Danielmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Re[2]: ZendOptimizer and libm.so.2?

2006-10-03 Thread Mark 

 -Original Message-
 From: Daniel Gerzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: woensdag 4 oktober 2006 0:27
 To: Mark
 Cc: 'Dan Nelson'; 'FreeBSD-Questions Questions'
 Subject: Re[2]: ZendOptimizer and libm.so.2?



 Hello Mark,

 Wednesday, October 4, 2006, 12:22:28 AM, you wrote:

   Which leads me to believe I'm correct in thinking Zend
   Optimizer really just needs libm.so.2, right?
 
  You're better off installing the misc/compat4x port to get
  libm.so.2 .

  No, I *have* libm.so.2 (FreeBSD 4.11); The port for Zend
  Optimizer

 You should be better with not having such an ancient system :-)

I still happen to think 4.11 is the most stable FreeBSD ever made. :)

I took the advice, though, but in reverse: I installed misc/compat5x
(after a bit of tweaking). And now I have a bonafide libm.so.3, in
/usr/local/lib/compat/libm.so.3. I'm probably not gonna win any beauty
contests with it, but this libm.so.3 is the real deal, at least.

- Mark

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]