/23 static routing question

2013-03-13 Thread Paul Macdonald
Hi, I have added an IP of the 2nd group of 254 addresses in a /23. let's call them100.100.98.0 and 100.100.99.0 what's the correct way to set up the routing table for this and how my rc.conf should look Currently netstat shows something like the below Destination

SOLVED /23 static routing question

2013-03-13 Thread Paul Macdonald
On 13/03/2013 14:59, Paul Macdonald wrote: Hi, I have added an IP of the 2nd group of 254 addresses in a /23. let's call them100.100.98.0 and 100.100.99.0 what's the correct way to set up the routing table for this and how my rc.conf should look Currently netstat

Re: wireless and/or routing question

2012-01-13 Thread Waitman Gobble
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Da Rock freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote: On 01/13/12 17:11, Waitman Gobble wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Da Rock freebsd-questions@**herveybayaustralia.com.aufreebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote: On 01/13/12

Re: wireless and/or routing question

2012-01-13 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Friday, January 13, 2012 a las 07:03:11AM -0800, Waitman Gobble escribió: Hi, Thanks. I've always heard countless rumors about WPA being wise :) I'll take your advice and take a step up in technology. My stubborn conservatism probably roots back to the time when not all devices could

Re: wireless and/or routing question

2012-01-13 Thread Warren Block
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote: Hello, I am running 9.0-RC3 i386 on an Acer Aspire One D150. i am having trouble with the wireless setup. I have two wireless cards, the BCM94312MCG that came with it, and an Atheros 5424/2424 that i swapped out. I can run the BCM with ndis and the

Re: wireless and/or routing question

2012-01-13 Thread Waitman Gobble
On Jan 13, 2012 7:19 AM, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote: El día Friday, January 13, 2012 a las 07:03:11AM -0800, Waitman Gobble escribió: Hi, Thanks. I've always heard countless rumors about WPA being wise :) I'll take your advice and take a step up in technology. My stubborn

Re: wireless and/or routing question

2012-01-13 Thread Waitman Gobble
On Jan 13, 2012 7:38 AM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote: Hello, I am running 9.0-RC3 i386 on an Acer Aspire One D150. i am having trouble with the wireless setup. I have two wireless cards, the BCM94312MCG that came with it, and an

Re: wireless and/or routing question

2012-01-13 Thread Da Rock
On 01/14/12 01:38, Warren Block wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote: Hello, I am running 9.0-RC3 i386 on an Acer Aspire One D150. i am having trouble with the wireless setup. I have two wireless cards, the BCM94312MCG that came with it, and an Atheros 5424/2424 that i swapped

Re: wireless and/or routing question UPDATE - WPA

2012-01-13 Thread Waitman Gobble
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Waitman Gobble gobble...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 13, 2012 7:19 AM, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote: El día Friday, January 13, 2012 a las 07:03:11AM -0800, Waitman Gobble escribió: Hi, Thanks. I've always heard countless rumors about WPA

Re: wireless and/or routing question UPDATE - WPA

2012-01-13 Thread Da Rock
On 01/14/12 16:28, Waitman Gobble wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Waitman Gobblegobble...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 13, 2012 7:19 AM, Matthias Apitzg...@unixarea.de wrote: El día Friday, January 13, 2012 a las 07:03:11AM -0800, Waitman Gobble escribió: Hi, Thanks. I've always heard

wireless and/or routing question

2012-01-12 Thread Waitman Gobble
Hello, I am running 9.0-RC3 i386 on an Acer Aspire One D150. i am having trouble with the wireless setup. I have two wireless cards, the BCM94312MCG that came with it, and an Atheros 5424/2424 that i swapped out. I can run the BCM with ndis and the windows xp driver, and the Atheros with the ath

Re: wireless and/or routing question

2012-01-12 Thread Waitman Gobble
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Waitman Gobble gobble...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I am running 9.0-RC3 i386 on an Acer Aspire One D150. i am having trouble with the wireless setup. Hi, update- i noticed if i start routed it complains... p00ntang# routed p00ntang# routed: wlan0

Re: wireless and/or routing question

2012-01-12 Thread Da Rock
On 01/13/12 15:29, Waitman Gobble wrote: Hello, I am running 9.0-RC3 i386 on an Acer Aspire One D150. i am having trouble with the wireless setup. I have two wireless cards, the BCM94312MCG that came with it, and an Atheros 5424/2424 that i swapped out. I can run the BCM with ndis and the

Re: wireless and/or routing question

2012-01-12 Thread Waitman Gobble
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Da Rock freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote: On 01/13/12 15:29, Waitman Gobble wrote: Hello, I am running 9.0-RC3 i386 on an Acer Aspire One D150. i am having trouble with the wireless setup. I have two wireless cards, the BCM94312MCG that

Re: wireless and/or routing question

2012-01-12 Thread Da Rock
On 01/13/12 17:11, Waitman Gobble wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Da Rock freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote: On 01/13/12 15:29, Waitman Gobble wrote: Hello, I am running 9.0-RC3 i386 on an Acer Aspire One D150. i am having trouble with the wireless setup. I have

Re: Routing Question

2010-08-27 Thread Patrick Lamaiziere
Le Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:17:19 -0700, Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org a écrit : PF's route_to will return the packets to the proper router, but I have not been able to figure out which ones those would be. The source IP address can be any on either network and its highly likely that we will see

Re: Routing Question

2010-08-27 Thread Doug Hardie
On 27 August 2010, at 05:07, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: Le Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:17:19 -0700, Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org a écrit : PF's route_to will return the packets to the proper router, but I have not been able to figure out which ones those would be. The source IP address can be any

Re: Routing Question

2010-08-27 Thread Nikos Vassiliadis
On 8/27/2010 9:09 PM, Doug Hardie wrote: On 27 August 2010, at 05:07, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: Le Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:17:19 -0700, Doug Hardiebc...@lafn.org a écrit : PF's route_to will return the packets to the proper router, but I have not been able to figure out which ones those would

Routing Question

2010-08-26 Thread Doug Hardie
I have several servers with one ethernet interface. Currently it is connected via a WAN to the internet. We are in the midst of switching to a different provider. I would like to be able to operate with both temporarily until all the users/services get switched. The new circuit is in and

Re: Multiple NICs routing question

2008-10-09 Thread Derek Ragona
At 06:26 AM 10/9/2008, Konrad Heuer wrote: Hello, I've a server box with four NICs addressing different subnets: NIC1: one class c subnet of same class b network NIC2: another class c subnet of same class b network NIC3: local unrouted network NIC4: local unrouted network In the

Multiple NICs routing question

2008-10-09 Thread Konrad Heuer
Hello, I've a server box with four NICs addressing different subnets: NIC1: one class c subnet of same class b network NIC2: another class c subnet of same class b network NIC3: local unrouted network NIC4: local unrouted network In the current configuration I use a default gateway

Re: Multiple NICs routing question

2008-10-09 Thread Olivier Nicole
I've a server box with four NICs addressing different subnets: NIC1: one class c subnet of same class b network NIC2: another class c subnet of same class b network NIC3: local unrouted network NIC4: local unrouted network In the current configuration I use a default gateway (and no

Re: IP alias/routing question

2008-07-26 Thread Steve Bertrand
David Allen wrote: On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris Pratt wrote: Carefully not answering the 'why do these packets come from the wrong address' question, Deliberately addressing the question of 'why do these packets come from the wrong

IP alias/routing question

2008-07-25 Thread Chris Pratt
This strikes me as a noob question but in 10 years of freebsd, I've never wrapped my brain around it and it seems to be causing me problems this time. I have many aliases on many servers. Some services listening on an alias address seem to return the packets out the alias address as shown in

Re: IP alias/routing question

2008-07-25 Thread Matthew Seaman
Chris Pratt wrote: I'm now setting up a bind server in which the third alias is the address for incoming DNS queries. It appears it's responding but even though the queries come in on the third alias, they go out through the primary address or more specifically, the packet count is incremented

Re: IP alias/routing question

2008-07-25 Thread Chris Pratt
On Jul 25, 2008, at 10:12 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: Chris Pratt wrote: I'm now setting up a bind server in which the third alias is the address for incoming DNS queries. It appears it's responding but even though the queries come in on the third alias, they go out through the primary address

Re: IP alias/routing question

2008-07-25 Thread David Allen
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris Pratt wrote: I'm now setting up a bind server in which the third alias is the address for incoming DNS queries. It appears it's responding but even though the queries come in on the third alias, they go out

Re: IP alias/routing question

2008-07-25 Thread Chris Pratt
On Jul 25, 2008, at 4:05 PM, David Allen wrote: On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris Pratt wrote: I'm now setting up a bind server in which the third alias is the address for incoming DNS queries. It appears it's responding but even though the

Re: routing question

2008-01-20 Thread Laszlo Nagy
Laszlo Nagy írta: - ping from pc on 0.0 network to 192.168.2.138 Well, I cannot do this from here. Those computers are X terminals, they do not run inetd nor sshd. I cannot login from here and I cannot leave now, but I can do it later if necessary. - sysctl -a net.inet.ip.forwarding

routing question

2008-01-17 Thread Laszlo Nagy
Hi, I have this configuration: Internet - [Hw Router] (LAN1: 192.168.2.0/24) - [ 192.168.2.138 GatewayComp 192.168.0.1 ] -- (LAN2: 192.168.0.0/24) I would like to access a computer from LAN1 to LAN2. LAN1 machine is: FreeBSD office1adsl.dyndns.org 6.2-RELEASE

Re: routing question

2008-01-17 Thread Steve Bertrand
Internet - [Hw Router] (LAN1: 192.168.2.0/24) - [ 192.168.2.138 GatewayComp 192.168.0.1 ] -- (LAN2: 192.168.0.0/24) I would like to access a computer from LAN1 to LAN2. Perform the following and post the results of: - ping from GatewayComp to pc on 0.0 network and a pc

Re: routing question

2008-01-17 Thread Laszlo Nagy
Steve Bertrand wrote: Internet - [Hw Router] (LAN1: 192.168.2.0/24) - [ 192.168.2.138 GatewayComp 192.168.0.1 ] -- (LAN2: 192.168.0.0/24) I would like to access a computer from LAN1 to LAN2. Perform the following and post the results of: - ping from GatewayComp to

Re: routing question

2008-01-17 Thread Laszlo Nagy
- ping from pc on 0.0 network to 192.168.2.138 Well, I cannot do this from here. Those computers are X terminals, they do not run inetd nor sshd. I cannot login from here and I cannot leave now, but I can do it later if necessary. - sysctl -a net.inet.ip.forwarding (on the GatewayComp)

Re: quick pf source-based routing question

2007-08-30 Thread CyberLeo Kitsana
Eric Crist wrote: Hey, We have a problem here at the office that I'd like to solve with pf and source-based routing. How would I write a rule with pf to route any traffic from 10.1.1.1 across a specific interface? Perhaps some permutation of the following? pass in on $int_if route-to {

quick pf source-based routing question

2007-08-28 Thread Eric Crist
Hey, We have a problem here at the office that I'd like to solve with pf and source-based routing. How would I write a rule with pf to route any traffic from 10.1.1.1 across a specific interface? Thanks! - Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks

Re: Routing Question

2006-12-12 Thread Nikos Vassiliadis
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 09:49, Bret J. Esquivel wrote: Hi, I have a cable modem at my office with a /28 allocated. I have a FreeBSD 6.1 firewall/router in between the cable modem and the switch to other nodes. My question is how could I add static routes to say my web server having

Routing Question

2006-12-12 Thread Bret J Esquivel
Hi, I have a cable modem at my office with a /28 allocated. I have a FreeBSD 6.1 firewall/router in between the cable modem and the switch to other nodes. My question is how could I add static routes to say my web server having an external IP address but still going through the firewall box?

Re: Routing Question

2006-12-12 Thread Vince Hoffman
Bret J Esquivel wrote: Hi, I have a cable modem at my office with a /28 allocated. I have a FreeBSD 6.1 firewall/router in between the cable modem and the switch to other nodes. My question is how could I add static routes to say my web server having an external IP address but still going

Re: Routing Question

2006-12-12 Thread Bill Moran
In response to Bret J Esquivel [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have a cable modem at my office with a /28 allocated. I have a FreeBSD 6.1 firewall/router in between the cable modem and the switch to other nodes. My question is how could I add static routes to say my web server having an external IP

Routing Question

2006-12-11 Thread Bret J. Esquivel
Hi, I have a cable modem at my office with a /28 allocated. I have a FreeBSD 6.1 firewall/router in between the cable modem and the switch to other nodes. My question is how could I add static routes to say my web server having an external IP address but still going through the firewall box?

Re: IP Routing Question

2006-02-15 Thread Steve Douville
- From: Drew Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Steve Douville [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:57 PM Subject: Re: IP Routing Question On 2/14/2006 11:43 AM Steve Douville wrote: By default, it sets the netif to em0 OK

IP Routing Question

2006-02-14 Thread Steve Douville
I'm trying to set up the routing table to force requests to certain IP addresses to use a particular ethernet card. I've used the route command in a number of ways, but still can't come up with how to force to use em1 instead of em0, with the right gateway. em0 is aaa.bbb.ccc.207 em1 is

Re: IP Routing Question

2006-02-14 Thread Goran Gajic
Hi, You can try using ipf filter to impose source-policy routing: cat ipf.example pass in quick on em1 to em1:192.168.1.2 from 10.1.0.0/16 to a.b.c.d/32 ^d ipf -f ipf.example This way you will re-route all packets coming from source 10.1/16 to destination a.b.c.d to go to address

RE: IP Routing Question

2006-02-14 Thread fbsd_user
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Goran Gajic Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 9:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IP Routing Question Hi, You can try using ipf filter to impose source-policy routing: cat ipf.example pass in quick on em1 to em1:192.168.1.2 from

Re: IP Routing Question

2006-02-14 Thread Drew Tomlinson
On 2/14/2006 5:44 AM Steve Douville wrote: I'm trying to set up the routing table to force requests to certain IP addresses to use a particular ethernet card. I've used the route command in a number of ways, but still can't come up with how to force to use em1 instead of em0, with the right

Re: IP Routing Question

2006-02-14 Thread Drew Tomlinson
-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 1:45 PM Subject: Re: IP Routing Question What happens with a simple 'route add certain ip address aaa.bbb.ccc.196? Or am I misinterpreting what you wish to achieve? HTH, Drew ___ freebsd-questions

Re: IP Routing Question

2006-02-14 Thread Steve Douville
By default, it sets the netif to em0 - Original Message - From: Drew Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Steve Douville [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:40 PM Subject: Re: IP Routing Question On 2/14/2006 11:17 AM Steve

Re: IP Routing Question

2006-02-14 Thread Drew Tomlinson
Message - From: Drew Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Steve Douville [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:40 PM Subject: Re: IP Routing Question On 2/14/2006 11:17 AM Steve Douville wrote: Weird stuff... route add -host

Re: IP Routing Question

2006-02-14 Thread Steve Douville
] To: Steve Douville [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:57 PM Subject: Re: IP Routing Question On 2/14/2006 11:43 AM Steve Douville wrote: By default, it sets the netif to em0 OK, then what about 'route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.209

Re: IP Routing Question

2006-02-14 Thread John Webster
--On Tuesday, February 14, 2006 11:40:45 -0800 Drew Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/14/2006 11:17 AM Steve Douville wrote: Weird stuff... route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.209 aaa.bbb.ccc.196 -ifp em1 Shouldn't this be: route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd aaa.bbb.ccc.209 Where

Re: IP Routing Question

2006-02-14 Thread Steve Douville
Routing Question ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: default routing question ZIPB ADSL PPPoA

2005-11-08 Thread Ahnjoan Amous
On 24 Oct 2005 09:22:34 -0400, Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ahnjoan Amous [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The short : I believe the problem I am having is due to routing. A DHCP server sends me IP A.B.C.D with a default route of A.B.C.D. dhclient isn't handling this well and I

Re: Quick Routing Question

2005-11-01 Thread Fabian Keil
Jason Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am setting up a wireless subnet and, while the gateway (FreeBSD system) is communicating fine with the wireless router, my other subnet is not able to connect to the wireless router. Here is a diagram of my network, I think it's fairly typical.

RE: Quick Routing Question

2005-11-01 Thread Steve Bertrand
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fabian Keil Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 5:58 AM To: Jason Morgan Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Quick Routing Question Jason Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am setting up

Re: Quick Routing Question

2005-11-01 Thread Jason Morgan
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:03:11AM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fabian Keil Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 5:58 AM To: Jason Morgan Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Quick Routing

Re: Quick Routing Question

2005-11-01 Thread Glenn Dawson
Questions Subject: Re: Quick Routing Question Jason Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am setting up a wireless subnet and, while the gateway (FreeBSD system) is communicating fine with the wireless router, my other subnet is not able to connect to the wireless router. Here

RE: Quick Routing Question

2005-11-01 Thread Brian E. Conklin
9:42 PM To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Quick Routing Question I am setting up a wireless subnet and, while the gateway (FreeBSD system) is communicating fine with the wireless router, my other subnet is not able to connect to the wireless router. Here is a diagram of my network, I think it's

RE: Quick Routing Question

2005-11-01 Thread Steve Bertrand
DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire default70.183.13.193 UGS 024701xl0 10/24 link#3 UC 00 fxp0 10.0.0.1 00:d0:b7:44:f9:c6 UHLW0 903lo0 10.0.0.2

Re: Quick Routing Question

2005-11-01 Thread Jason Morgan
Mason General Hospital http://www.masongeneral.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Morgan Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 9:42 PM To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Quick Routing Question I am setting up a wireless subnet

Re: Quick Routing Question

2005-11-01 Thread Jason Morgan
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:25:25AM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote: DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire default70.183.13.193 UGS 024701xl0 10/24 link#3 UC 00 fxp0 10.0.0.1

RE: Quick Routing Question

2005-11-01 Thread Steve Bertrand
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Morgan Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 11:03 AM To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Quick Routing Question On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:25:25AM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote: Destination

Re: Quick Routing Question

2005-11-01 Thread Jason Morgan
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:24:59AM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Morgan Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 11:03 AM To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Quick Routing Question On Tue

Re: Quick Routing Question

2005-11-01 Thread Fabian Keil
Jason Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:24:59AM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote: And again, tcpdump is a very good tool. The -i switch tells it what interface to listen on, so if the wireless side of the router works but you can't ping across to the cabled side, then

RE: Quick Routing Question

2005-11-01 Thread Steve Bertrand
Ok, it looks like it was an issue with the default settings on the Linksys (and is still somewhat of an issue). I can now connect to systems in each of the two subnets and I also have routing to the outside world from both subnets. My only remaining issue is getting to the web app setup

Re: Quick Routing Question

2005-11-01 Thread Jason Morgan
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:37:16PM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote: Jason Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:24:59AM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote: And again, tcpdump is a very good tool. The -i switch tells it what interface to listen on, so if the wireless side of

Re: Quick Routing Question

2005-11-01 Thread Jason Morgan
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:42:27PM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote: Ok, it looks like it was an issue with the default settings on the Linksys (and is still somewhat of an issue). I can now connect to systems in each of the two subnets and I also have routing to the outside world from

RE: Quick Routing Question

2005-11-01 Thread Steve Bertrand
I never explicity set the FreeBSD machine to enable NAT between these subnets. Should I do so? Do I just add another natd_interface to rc.conf? You do not want to do this. The below config in rc.conf is correct. It states that nat will only be enabled for the external interface, for both

Re: Quick Routing Question

2005-11-01 Thread Eric F Crist
On Nov 1, 2005, at 11:15 AM, Jason Morgan wrote: ... Ok, it looks like it was an issue with the default settings on the Linksys (and is still somewhat of an issue). I can now connect to systems in each of the two subnets and I also have routing to the outside world from both subnets. My only

Re: Quick Routing Question

2005-11-01 Thread Jason Morgan
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 03:10:44PM -0600, Eric F Crist wrote: On Nov 1, 2005, at 11:15 AM, Jason Morgan wrote: ... Ok, it looks like it was an issue with the default settings on the Linksys (and is still somewhat of an issue). I can now connect to systems in each of the two subnets and I

RE: Quick Routing Question

2005-11-01 Thread Steve Bertrand
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Morgan Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 6:47 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quick Routing Question On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 03:10:44PM -0600, Eric F Crist wrote

Re: Quick Routing Question

2005-11-01 Thread Jason Morgan
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 07:49:54PM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Morgan Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 6:47 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quick Routing Question

RE: Quick Routing Question

2005-11-01 Thread Steve Bertrand
Bingo, it was the static route. The wireless router didn't like getting connection attempts from 10.0.0.0 addresses. Turns out, the FreeBSD machine was operating as advertised. Now it's time to get IPSEC set up. Awesome :) You have any q's in your new venture that aren't related to

Quick Routing Question

2005-10-31 Thread Jason Morgan
I am setting up a wireless subnet and, while the gateway (FreeBSD system) is communicating fine with the wireless router, my other subnet is not able to connect to the wireless router. Here is a diagram of my network, I think it's fairly typical. Wired Subnet (10.0.0.x)

Re: default routing question ZIPB ADSL PPPoA

2005-10-24 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Ahnjoan Amous [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The short : I believe the problem I am having is due to routing. A DHCP server sends me IP A.B.C.D with a default route of A.B.C.D. dhclient isn't handling this well and I don't know how to fix it. Windows as well as Linux DHCP clients do not have a

Re: default routing question ZIPB ADSL PPPoA

2005-10-24 Thread Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez
El Dom 23 Oct 2005 20:22, Ahnjoan Amous escribió: The long : I have a CellPipe ADSL router/bridge from Lucent. This device is provided by our ISP. I am exploring the ZIPB functionality of the device to allow my FreeBSD host to own the public IP. The basics of the configuration for those

default routing question ZIPB ADSL PPPoA

2005-10-23 Thread Ahnjoan Amous
The short : I believe the problem I am having is due to routing. A DHCP server sends me IP A.B.C.D with a default route of A.B.C.D. dhclient isn't handling this well and I don't know how to fix it. Windows as well as Linux DHCP clients do not have a problem with this and I am at my wits end trying

default routing question ZIPB ADSL PPPoA

2005-10-22 Thread Ahnjoan Amous
The short : I believe the problem I am having is due to routing. A DHCP server sends me IP A.B.C.D with a default route of A.B.C.D. dhclient isn't handling this well and I don't know how to fix it. Windows as well as Linux DHCP clients do not have a problem with this and I am at my wits end

Re: Routing question?

2005-04-14 Thread Kurt Buff
Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Apr 13), Kurt Buff said: I have a FreeBSD 5.3 box running postfix/amavisd-new/spamassassin/clamav. Currently, we have two entrances to our network, one is the Watchguard FBIII for our T1, the other is a PC running Win2k and Winproxy, serving our DSL line. The

Re: Routing question? second reply

2005-04-14 Thread Kurt Buff
Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Apr 13), Kurt Buff said: I have a FreeBSD 5.3 box running postfix/amavisd-new/spamassassin/clamav. Currently, we have two entrances to our network, one is the Watchguard FBIII for our T1, the other is a PC running Win2k and Winproxy, serving our DSL line. The

Re: Routing question?

2005-04-14 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Apr 14), Kurt Buff said: Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Apr 13), Kurt Buff said: I have a FreeBSD 5.3 box running postfix/amavisd-new/spamassassin/clamav. Currently, we have two entrances to our network, one is the Watchguard FBIII for our T1, the other is a PC

Re: Routing question? second reply

2005-04-14 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Apr 14), Kurt Buff said: Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Apr 13), Kurt Buff said: I have a FreeBSD 5.3 box running postfix/amavisd-new/spamassassin/clamav. Currently, we have two entrances to our network, one is the Watchguard FBIII for our T1, the other is a PC

Routing question?

2005-04-13 Thread Kurt Buff
All, I have a FreeBSD 5.3 box running postfix/amavisd-new/spamassassin/clamav. Currently, we have two entrances to our network, one is the Watchguard FBIII for our T1, the other is a PC running Win2k and Winproxy, serving our DSL line. The PC is starting to flake out, and I'd like to replace

Routing question?

2005-04-13 Thread Kurt Buff
Looks like I sent the first copy from an old address. Sorry if this dupes... All, I have a FreeBSD 5.3 box running postfix/amavisd-new/spamassassin/clamav. Currently, we have two entrances to our network, one is the Watchguard FBIII for our T1, the other is a PC running Win2k and Winproxy, serving

Re: Routing question?

2005-04-13 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Apr 13), Kurt Buff said: I have a FreeBSD 5.3 box running postfix/amavisd-new/spamassassin/clamav. Currently, we have two entrances to our network, one is the Watchguard FBIII for our T1, the other is a PC running Win2k and Winproxy, serving our DSL line. The PC is

CVSUP Routing question

2004-11-30 Thread Mark Jayson Alvarez
Good day! Is it possible to tell cvsup to use another machine's global access in fetching the freebsd source updates?? Here's my office workstation setup: (private ip) (pri/pub ip) (all public) workstation router proxy server---internet mail server

Re: CVSUP Routing question

2004-11-30 Thread David Landgren
Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote: Good day! Is it possible to tell cvsup to use another machine's global access in fetching the freebsd source updates?? Here's my office workstation setup: (private ip) (pri/pub ip) (all public) workstation router proxy server---internet

RE: Routing where can I ask a wirless routing question freebsd

2004-07-25 Thread Dan
Hello, In using FreeBsd 5.2.1-Release I am running into some trouble. I have successfully recompiled the kernel with support for atheros based wireless cards. I have also been able to setup the card into access point Hostap mode correctly. I have tried the bridging recommend in the FreeBSD

RE: Routing question

2004-06-12 Thread Leon Botes
] Sent: 11 June 2004 18:16 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Routing question Perhaps if you post more info, we can come up with creative solutions for you. My big question is why? AFAIK, you cannot have more than one default gateway, unless you are using netgraph to balance

RE: Routing question

2004-06-12 Thread Leon Botes
] Sent: 11 June 2004 18:12 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Routing question Leon, This is possible, but will require you to run static routes so that you can manually manage the connections. You should be able to set the routing metrics so that all your traffic from client D goes to B

Routing question

2004-06-11 Thread Leon Botes
I have a box with 5 nics. Cal them A,B,C,D,E. A B are different internet connections. E is a connection to a mail server on a public /29 C D are connections for 2 differnet client networks. Is it possible to have all traffic coming in via C sent to a default gateway on A's network and all

Re: Routing question

2004-06-11 Thread Ben Timby
Perhaps if you post more info, we can come up with creative solutions for you. My big question is why? AFAIK, you cannot have more than one default gateway, unless you are using netgraph to balance between network interfaces. However, you could NAT C D to their respective public interfaces.

RE: routing question

2004-06-06 Thread doug
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 11:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: routing question I am trying to configure a wireless router so I am redefining routes and IP address of my system. After booting dhclient

routing question

2004-06-05 Thread doug
I am trying to configure a wireless router so I am redefining routes and IP address of my system. After booting dhclient ep0 works fine. After messing around with the wireless router I was just going back to my ethernet connection so I did: ifconfig ep0 192.168.0.3 remove arp -da route

RE: routing question

2004-06-05 Thread Eric Crist
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 11:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: routing question I am trying to configure a wireless router so I am redefining routes and IP address of my system. After booting dhclient ep0 works fine. After messing around with the wireless router I

Routing question -- Samba

2004-02-09 Thread Marius Kirschner
I have a 4.9 box that's on a public IP and I want to configure Samba so it only accepts connections from the private network (192.168.1). My question is, can I do that with only 1 NIC card or do I have to add a second NIC for the private LAN? ---Marius

RE: Routing question -- Samba

2004-02-09 Thread Derrick MacPherson
You can do that within the smb.conf Use SWAT, advanced options, I think just for the share... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marius Kirschner Sent: Monday, 9 February 2004 12:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Routing question

RE: Routing question -- Samba

2004-02-09 Thread Jason Lavigne
] On Behalf Of Marius Kirschner Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 3:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Routing question -- Samba I have a 4.9 box that's on a public IP and I want to configure Samba so it only accepts connections from the private network (192.168.1). My question is, can I do

Re: Routing question -- Samba

2004-02-09 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 03:40:04PM -0500, Marius Kirschner wrote: I have a 4.9 box that's on a public IP and I want to configure Samba so it only accepts connections from the private network (192.168.1). My question is, can I do that with only 1 NIC card or do I have to add a second NIC for

routing question

2004-01-09 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Hello everybody :) I have a routing question and was wondering if FreeBSD was able to do this. I have 2 ISPs (so 2 connections). Can I use only one FreeBSD box as a gateway to: - route LAN -- INTERNET (using connection 1) - route DMZ -- INTERNET (using connection 2) - route LAN -- DMZ (simple

Re: IPSEC Tunnel Routing question

2003-12-05 Thread Matthew Faircliff
v8.04 Subject: IPSEC Tunnel Routing question I would like to route all traffic over a gif/ipsec tunnel I have the following situation Existing internet connection in building A Building to building wireless(between building A and Building B) To secure the traffic going across the wireless I would

  1   2   >