On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 1:20 PM, O. Hartmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johan Hendriks wrote:
Konrad Heuer wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote:
We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to
CVE-2008-1105 shouldn't it be R3.0.30?
As far as I know the mentioned
Konrad Heuer wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote:
We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to
CVE-2008-1105 shouldn't it be R3.0.30?
As far as I know the mentioned security patch gets applied when building
Samba from ports.
Best regards
Konrad Heuer
GWDG, Am
May 2008 11:47:46
3.0.28a_1,1
This is a security update of Samba 3.0.28a, that address CVE-2008-1105.
Approved by:shaun (mentor, implicit)
Security: CVE-2008-1105
Regards,
Johan Hendriks
Double L Automatisering
___
freebsd-questions
it is bumped!
29 May 2008 11:47:46
3.0.28a_1,1
This is a security update of Samba 3.0.28a, that address CVE-2008-1105.
Approved by:shaun (mentor, implicit)
Security: CVE-2008-1105
Regards,
Johan Hendriks
Double L Automatisering
Well, sorry making this noise, I looked
We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to CVE-2008-1105
shouldn't it be R3.0.30?
Regards,
Oliver
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote:
We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to CVE-2008-1105
shouldn't it be R3.0.30?
As far as I know the mentioned security patch gets applied when building
Samba from ports.
Best regards
Konrad Heuer
GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077
