Re: SCO going after BSD???

2003-11-22 Thread Kris Kirby
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: There's no possible sense in which this can be true. Plain text attachments do not create a security or virus risk. Give Microsoft some time -- Kris Kirby, KE4AHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] TGIFreeBSD IM: 'KrisBSD' BIG BROTHER IS

Re: SCO going after BSD???

2003-11-20 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:28:04PM -0600, Minnesota Slinky wrote: I talked to a couple of people who do beta testing for Microsoft and they said the issue came up a few years ago. According to them (one being my father), it has to do with security and virus protection. Again, this is

Re: SCO going after BSD???

2003-11-20 Thread Terry Lambert
Gregory Sutter wrote: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline These headers show that the part is not an attachment but should be displayed inline, and that it contains pure text that doesn't need a special handler to be displayed. Why Outlook Express

Re: SCO going after BSD???

2003-11-20 Thread Terry Lambert
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:28:04PM -0600, Minnesota Slinky wrote: I talked to a couple of people who do beta testing for Microsoft and they said the issue came up a few years ago. According to them (one being my father), it has to do with security and virus

Re: SCO going after BSD???

2003-11-20 Thread Bill Campbell
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: Gregory Sutter wrote: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline These headers show that the part is not an attachment but should be displayed inline, and that it contains pure text that doesn't need a special

SCO going after BSD???

2003-11-19 Thread Sean Countryman
http://www.atnewyork.com/news/article.php/3110981 Has anyone seen this? Now SCO is apparently planning on filing suit against BSD and users like us? I had been watching the SCO vs. Linux thing from the sidelines, now it looks like we're in the game too. Sean

Re: SCO going after BSD???

2003-11-19 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 05:44:45PM -0700, Sean Countryman wrote: http://www.atnewyork.com/news/article.php/3110981 Has anyone seen this? Now SCO is apparently planning on filing suit against BSD and users like us? Yes, it's been discussed on other lists where it's not off-topic. I had

Re: SCO going after BSD???

2003-11-19 Thread SWIT
] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 7:52 PM Subject: Re: SCO going after BSD??? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SCO going after BSD???

2003-11-19 Thread Gregory Sutter
On 2003-11-19 20:11 -0500, SWIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is this a unix thing or what. many times i get messages from the list were the message is an attachment and not in the email. was curious as to why. The messages you see as attachments are messages that have been PGP signed to prove

Mail problems (was: SCO going after BSD???)

2003-11-19 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
PROTECTED] To: Sean Countryman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 7:52 PM Subject: Re: SCO going after BSD??? Kris PGP signs his mail (like I do). This requires MIME. Most MUAs show text/plain attachments directly. Greg -- See complete headers

RE: SCO going after BSD???

2003-11-19 Thread Minnesota Slinky
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gregory Sutter Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 7:39 PM To: SWIT Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SCO going after BSD??? On 2003-11-19 20:11 -0500, SWIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote