On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:17:13 +0100
"文鳥" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> is there any way to securely follow the STABLE branch of FreeBSD, e.g.
> a cryptographically signed distribution method like portsnap? Afaik,
> the usual update methods (CVSup, etc.) do not include any
> authentic
Hi,
文鳥 wrote:
> 08/01/13 に Erik Cederstrand<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> さんは書きました:
>> 文鳥 wrote:
>>> 2008/1/13, Erik Cederstrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
文鳥 wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> is there any way to securely follow the STABLE branch of FreeBSD, e.g.
> a cryptographically signed distribution
08/01/13 に Erik Cederstrand<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> さんは書きました:
> 文鳥 wrote:
> > 2008/1/13, Erik Cederstrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> 文鳥 wrote:
> >>> Hello all,
> >>>
> >>> is there any way to securely follow the STABLE branch of FreeBSD, e.g.
> >>> a cryptographically signed distribution method like port
Hello ??,
Sunday, January 13, 2008, 11:17:13 AM, you wrote:
> Hello all,
> is there any way to securely follow the STABLE branch of FreeBSD, e.g.
I am afraid that this isn't currently possible with -STABLE branches.
--
Best regards,
Danielmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/1/13, Erik Cederstrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 文鳥 wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > is there any way to securely follow the STABLE branch of FreeBSD, e.g.
> > a cryptographically signed distribution method like portsnap? Afaik,
> > the usual update methods (CVSup, etc.) do not include any
> > authe
Hello all,
is there any way to securely follow the STABLE branch of FreeBSD, e.g.
a cryptographically signed distribution method like portsnap? Afaik,
the usual update methods (CVSup, etc.) do not include any
authentication / integrity checking. Am I missing something here?
Thanks in advance
