--- Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/20/06, Danial Thom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
User manuals and how-tos don't generally get
copyright notices, because there is nothing
creative about it. Someone could write
exactly
the same thing (just about), and you'd have
little claim
On 6/19/06, John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 18 June 2006 19:49, David Hoffman wrote:
* *It appears the page at
http://www.houfug.org/help/install_freebsd.htmconstitutes a serious
breach of copyright. The article, which was
originally written and posted to the Internet by
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Hoffman
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 6:21 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Fwd: Fwd: Serious breach of copyright -- First post
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jun 18, 2006 9:19 PM
Mr. Hoffman, I'm surprised this hasn't been said, and I'm probably
overstepping my bounds by saying this, but I've been following this
topic, and I have trouble seeing it as anything but trolling. The
freeBSD groups have always been excessively helpful and friendly, and
you've done alot to insult
--- Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/19/06, Christopher Weldon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brett wrote:
Obviously, you have never spent days trying
out a relatively
undocumented procedure, finally getting it
right, and then decided
--- Jim Stapleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mr. Hoffman, I'm surprised this hasn't been
said, and I'm probably
overstepping my bounds by saying this, but I've
been following this
topic, and I have trouble seeing it as anything
but trolling. The
freeBSD groups have always been excessively
On 6/20/06, Danial Thom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
User manuals and how-tos don't generally get
copyright notices, because there is nothing
creative about it. Someone could write exactly
the same thing (just about), and you'd have
little claim to it because its just a procedural
description.
Dennis Olvany [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I had a look at http://www.houfug.org/help/install_freebsd.htm and I am
afraid that you will find this article is not eligible for copyright. It
constitutes neither an artistic nor literary work. The article conveys
only facts and facts are not eligible
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jun 18, 2006 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: Serious breach of copyright -- First post
To: Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think a formal apology should be issued by the infringers.
Hasn't this gone on long enough?
On 6/18/06
David Hoffman wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jun 18, 2006 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: Serious breach of copyright -- First post
To: Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think a formal apology should be issued by the infringers.
Hasn't this gone
I responded to Bretts email 6 minutes after he informed me there maybe a
problem with this article. He did NOT bother to tell me he was the owner of
it. All I knew is someone named Brett at [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
letting me know there was a problem. I immediately went to arbornet.org to
see
]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Subject:* [Hou-freebsd] Serious breach of copyright -- First post
**It appears the page at
http://www.houfug.org/help/install_freebsd.htmconstitutes a serious breach of
copyright. The article, which
Hello
I hope the DMCA copyright notice, found at
http://arbornet.org/~soup/dmca.html , clears up any confusion.
thank you!
On 6/18/06, Ingrid Kast Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I responded to Bretts email 6 minutes after he informed me there maybe a
problem with this article. He did NOT
It'll certainly be less confusing that what HouFUG is publishing. They've
now noted on their site that it was written by you. However, they STILL
claim they own the copyright. Have you waived any of your exclusive rights
to the work?
On 6/18/06, Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I hope
Update: their website now attributes copyright to both HouFUG AND Brett.
This is despite the fact that Brett seems to be the sole owner of the work.
I'm not sure why this community feels it can disregard rights to
intellectual property, especially when it produces so much on its OWN to be
proud
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jun 18, 2006 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: Serious breach of copyright -- First post
To: Dennis Olvany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], thisdayislong
...facts are not eligible for copyright.
I'm afraid you're incorrect. The work in question is indeed copyrightable
under the Berne Convention, which many countries have ratified, including
the United States, where the content is hosted. The United States, as well
as many other countries,
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:44:02 -0500
Ingrid Kast Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If someone added it to the freebsd-config mailing list, they should not have
mailed a copyritten piece on a mailing list for public use.
This has been added to the bottom of the page since we are unsure of the
18 matches
Mail list logo
