Re: Setting CPUTYPE and CFLAGS in make.conf

2008-04-09 Thread RW
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:14:45 -0700 David Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The advice I've read in several posts on the subject involve everything from setting one, setting both, to ignoring both, sometimes with the =? notation and sometimes without. And then, I've read comments that suggest

Re: Setting CPUTYPE and CFLAGS in make.conf

2008-04-09 Thread David Allen
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:44 AM, RW wrote: On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:14:45 -0700 David Allen wrote: The advice I've read in several posts on the subject involve everything from setting one, setting both, to ignoring both, sometimes with the =? notation and sometimes without. And then, I've

Re: Setting CPUTYPE and CFLAGS in make.conf

2008-04-09 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 11:35:51AM -0700, David Allen wrote: [...] Thank you for your reply. It's starting to make a lot more sense. Just to confirm, then, if there's no CPUTYPE set, I can then set up a build server on an Opteron box, for example, to build world, kernel and ports binaries

Re: Setting CPUTYPE and CFLAGS in make.conf

2008-04-09 Thread Roland Smith
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 11:35:51AM -0700, David Allen wrote: Avoid setting CFLAGS unless you have a good reason - Gentoo documentation has a lot to answer for. CPUTYPE causes -march to be applied, so it can affect compatibility. AFAIK both setting do affect world and kernel because CFLAGS

Re: Setting CPUTYPE and CFLAGS in make.conf

2008-04-09 Thread RW
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:35:51 -0700 David Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you for your reply. It's starting to make a lot more sense. Just to confirm, then, if there's no CPUTYPE set, I can then set up a build server on an Opteron box, for example, to build world, kernel and ports

Setting CPUTYPE and CFLAGS in make.conf

2008-04-08 Thread David Allen
The advice I've read in several posts on the subject involve everything from setting one, setting both, to ignoring both, sometimes with the =? notation and sometimes without. And then, I've read comments that suggest when compiling the kernel, for example, both are ignored, and default values