On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 04:42:15PM -0400, Gerard Seibert wrote:
When running 'portsclean', this message is displayed:
** /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.3 is shadowed by /lib/libcrypto.so.3
/lib/libcrypto.so.3 - ?
/usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.3 - openssl-0.9.8
-- This may be an undesirable situation
Leave /lib/libcrypto.so.3 (specify -i to ask on this)
** /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.3 is shadowed by /usr/lib/libssl.so.3
/usr/lib/libssl.so.3- ?
/usr/local/lib/libssl.so.3 - openssl-0.9.8
-- This may be an undesirable situation
Leave /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 (specify -i to ask on this)
Would it be safe to delete the redundant library? I assume that I should
remove the /usr/lib/ version and not the /usr/local/lib version.
No one has jumped in with advice, so I'd like to know
if you make any decision:: like mv'ing, say,
/lib/libcrypto.so.3 to /lib/libcrypto.so.3.tmp
and see what hits the fan. If anything.
I'm working, carefully, on upgrading my three FBSD
platforms and saw the same thing you have with portsclean.
I also used libchk, but it didn't help very much.
So I'm wondering too.
(NOT to complain, but how does Linux/Ubuntulinux keep its
systems free of excess libs?)
gary
--
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org Public service Unix
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
