in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg thusly...
I apologize for replying so late.
parv wrote:
...only thing that i desire(d) is/was to give / much less than 128MB,
but couldn't (during the space slicing).
That and to combine /usr2 /usr3 now. But default inode
parv wrote:
...only thing that i desire(d) is/was to give / much less than 128MB,
but couldn't (during the space slicing).
That and to combine /usr2 /usr3 now. But default inode space
allocation of 8%/slice will kill me anyway. I really have to remember
about the newfs options next time.
Do you
Hi there,
I've installed freebsd 4.9 and am currently busy with
installing third party apps through the ports
collection.
What worries me however is the size of my /var
directory.
Take a look at my disk geometry..
I also had to get rid of a pkg.db file in the
/var/db/pkg directory because it took
Hi there,
I've installed freebsd 4.9 and am currently busy with
installing third party apps through the ports
collection.
What worries me however is the size of my /var
directory.
Take a look at my disk geometry (below)
I also had to get rid of a pkg.db file in the
/var/db/pkg directory because
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 01:38:35AM -0800, Dino Vliet wrote:
Hi there,
I've installed freebsd 4.9 and am currently busy with
installing third party apps through the ports
collection.
What worries me however is the size of my /var
directory.
You might consider symlinking /var to /usr/var
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Dino Vliet thusly...
I've installed freebsd 4.9 and am currently busy with installing third
party apps through the ports collection. What worries me however is
the size of my /var directory. Take a look at my disk geometry
(below)
I also had to get rid
