On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 09:10:07PM -0700, Yuri wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> I'm a little confused. I was mainly referring to your statement:
>>
>> "There is one large active process slowly growing in memory from 500MB
>> to 1300MB, not reading or writing any files."
>>
>> What field in top(1
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I'm a little confused. I was mainly referring to your statement:
"There is one large active process slowly growing in memory from 500MB
to 1300MB, not reading or writing any files."
What field in top(1) were you looking at to determine this kind of
growth?
Sorry, I
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 04:43:09PM -0700, Yuri wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> Regarding the "memory bloat", what field in top(1) are you basing this
>> on?
>>
>
> For the total CPU usage I used
> CPU: 100.0% user Active... all others were zeros.
> For the process CPU I looked at WCPU.
I'm a
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Regarding the "memory bloat", what field in top(1) are you basing this
on?
For the total CPU usage I used
CPU: 100.0% user Active... all others were zeros.
For the process CPU I looked at WCPU.
Yuri
___
freebsd-questions@fr
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 01:54:13PM -0700, Yuri wrote:
> I have STABLE-71 machine with 2GB memory and single 2GHz AMD3200 CPU.
>
> There is one large active process slowly growing in memory from 500MB to
> 1300MB, not reading or writing any files.
> There are many dormant processes almost not runn
I have STABLE-71 machine with 2GB memory and single 2GHz AMD3200 CPU.
There is one large active process slowly growing in memory from 500MB to
1300MB, not reading or writing any files.
There are many dormant processes almost not running at all.
Swap size remains constant (185MB). Total physical
