Nicholas Bernstein wrote:
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 00:06, Jorn Argelo wrote:
Nicholas Bernstein wrote:
:: snip ::
I wonder ... why do want to run CURRENT on a machine like that? It's the
bleeding edge source code, which is unstable most of the times. You
might want to consider running 4.9 on that machine, which is the
production release. You can try 5.2.1 as well, but it still falls under
the unstable branch.
So in other words, post your error at the CURRENT mailing list, and
switch back to 4.9. I think you will solve many problems with that.
Cheers,
Jorn
Glad you pointed that out; I intended to be running release, as someone
on irc stated that 5.2.1 did not have a stable branch as of yet I
assumed that running release would be OK. I think it got converted to
CURRENT when I did a cvsup to make everything up to date. By specifying
'*default release-cvs tag-.' would that default to current?
Thanks, I appreciate the advice,
Nick
I believe it's set to 4.9 by default, but I'm not sure. Anyway, you
shouldn't do a downgrade with sources. 4.9 is very different when
comparing it with 5.2.1. Perhaps it's possible, but I wouldn't put too
high hopes in that. You should just download the 4.9 CD and reinstall
your machine completely to make sure your machine will be running smoothly.
Cheers,
Jorn
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
