Re: T2000 Sparc FreeBSD8.2 installation failed

2012-01-27 Thread Thomas Mueller
 On 01/26/2012 02:05 PM, Anonymous wrote:

  NetBSD
  Not recommended, sorry to say

 Why?

Fritz Wuehler fr...@spamexpire-201201.rodent.frell.theremailer.net responded:

 Net has support for less sparc64 platforms than OpenBSD or FreeBSD and
 NetBSD reliability has gone downhill. I am sad to say it but I think Net's
 best days are behind us. I hope I have to eat my words some day. It used to
 be my favorite OS and pkgsrc is fantastic.

NetBSD supports many different platforms, maybe it's the way they count that 
makes it look like more than FreeBSD and Linux?

I have great problems with NetBSD on new Intel Sandy Bridge computer.

It was FreeBSD 9.0_BETA1 that caused me to suspend the struggle with NetBSD.

NetBSD-HEAD (5.99.xx to become 6.0) wouldn't even boot from hard-drive 
installation, would boot partway but hang.

Installation CD would boot maybe half the time.

NetBSD 5.1_STABLE would boot, but always went into immediate hard reboot when I 
tried to go to X.

On old computer, I have weird screenblanking problems with both NetBSD 
5.1_STABLE and HEAD; 4.0.1 was somewhat better.

On new computer, apparently the only viable open-source OSes are FreeBSD and 
Linux.

OpenBSD seems too backward and problematic, I never installed that.


Tom
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: T2000 Sparc FreeBSD8.2 installation failed

2012-01-26 Thread Anonymous
 At this stage, your options appear to be: illumos/OpenIndiana

Not being developed on SPARC

 Linux,

AFAIK Gentoo, Funtoo, Debian are the only supporting distros and you will
need to check if sun4v and your machine are supported

 NetBSD

Not recommended, sorry to say

 or OpenBSD.

Highly recommended.

 Note that I've not tried any of these.

OpenBSD seems to work brilliantly on my sun4u machines, not sure how much of
the sun4v are supported but you can ask on the sparc64 list openbsd.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: T2000 Sparc FreeBSD8.2 installation failed

2012-01-26 Thread Rares Aioanei

On 01/26/2012 02:05 PM, Anonymous wrote:


NetBSD
Not recommended, sorry to say


Why?


--
Rares Aioanei

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: T2000 Sparc FreeBSD8.2 installation failed

2012-01-26 Thread Fritz Wuehler
You wrote:

 On 01/26/2012 02:05 PM, Anonymous wrote:
 
  NetBSD
  Not recommended, sorry to say
 
 Why?

Net has support for less sparc64 platforms than OpenBSD or FreeBSD and
NetBSD reliability has gone downhill. I am sad to say it but I think Net's
best days are behind us. I hope I have to eat my words some day. It used to
be my favorite OS and pkgsrc is fantastic.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org