Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-06 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 09:16:00AM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > >AFAIK the "danger" is that someone boots the machine with an > >installer for some other OS, and that installer treats the > >disk as unformatted -- hence "obviously" containing nothing > >important -- because it doesn't have

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-06 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 11:28:32PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Dangerous is probably overstating the issue a bit ... > > AFAIK the "danger" is that someone boots the machine with an > installer for some other OS, and that installer treats the > disk as unformatted -- hence "obviously" con

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-06 Thread Wojciech Puchar
AFAIK the "danger" is that someone boots the machine with an installer for some other OS, and that installer treats the disk as unformatted -- hence "obviously" containing nothing important -- because it doesn't have a recognizable MBR. some people rarely boot other OS :) __

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-05 Thread perryh
> Dangerous is probably overstating the issue a bit ... AFAIK the "danger" is that someone boots the machine with an installer for some other OS, and that installer treats the disk as unformatted -- hence "obviously" containing nothing important -- because it doesn't have a recognizable MBR. _

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-05 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 03:58:23AM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 10:49 -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 12:57:45PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 20:55 -0500, Robert Huff wrote: > > > > Da Rock writes: > > > > > > > > > Exc

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-04 Thread Da Rock
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 10:49 -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote: > On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 12:57:45PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 20:55 -0500, Robert Huff wrote: > > > Da Rock writes: > > > > > > > Excuse my nose in here- I just have a couple of questions. > > > > > > > >

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-04 Thread Wojciech Puchar
I have never booted a FreeBSD system from a disk which contained any other operating system. I have only used "dangerously dadicated" mode for FreeBSD, except when sysinstall made selecting/implementing that too much work. almost like me except i don't use sysinstall, and manually

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-04 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 12:57:45PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 20:55 -0500, Robert Huff wrote: > > Da Rock writes: > > > > > Excuse my nose in here- I just have a couple of questions. > > > > > > 1) It IS possible to boot from a dedicated disk? > > > > Yes. Can't re

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-04 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 11:47:23AM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 11:39 -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 11:17:40AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:56:44 +0100 (CET), Pieter Donche <[EMAIL > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > If Fr

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-04 Thread Robert Huff
Da Rock writes: > > > Excuse my nose in here- I just have a couple of questions. > > > > > > 1) It IS possible to boot from a dedicated disk? > > > >Yes. Can't remember the last time I used anything else. > > So you've never booted from a disk that has been partitioned as a file

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-04 Thread Da Rock
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 20:55 -0500, Robert Huff wrote: > Da Rock writes: > > > Excuse my nose in here- I just have a couple of questions. > > > > 1) It IS possible to boot from a dedicated disk? > > Yes. Can't remember the last time I used anything else. So you've never booted from a

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-03 Thread Robert Huff
Da Rock writes: > Excuse my nose in here- I just have a couple of questions. > > 1) It IS possible to boot from a dedicated disk? Yes. Can't remember the last time I used anything else. > 2) Does using dedicated mode increase the space available to use? > Partitioning normally ta

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-03 Thread Da Rock
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 11:39 -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 11:17:40AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: > > > On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:56:44 +0100 (CET), Pieter Donche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > If FreeBSD is to put on the system as only operating system (Fdisk: > > > "A

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-02 Thread Polytropon
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:53:23 +0100 (CET), Pieter Donche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know / is the "root partition", but /root is the home-directory of > the user root (/etc/passwd: root:*:0:0:Charlie &:/root:/bin/csh). > I doubt this will ever be needed to be large? There is no special advice

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-02 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 11:17:40AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: > On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:56:44 +0100 (CET), Pieter Donche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > If FreeBSD is to put on the system as only operating system (Fdisk: > > "A = Use Entire disk"), then will the BSD-partitions will show up as > > ad

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-02 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 11:53:23AM +0100, Pieter Donche wrote: > On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Polytropon wrote: > > > ad0 |---| the whole disk > > ad0s1 \--/ one slice > >ad0s1X \--/\---/\-/\-/\---/\--

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-02 Thread Wojciech Puchar
ad0a (/), ad0b (swap), ad0d (/var) etc... correct or not (then what)? You're mixing terminology here. :-) The "use entire disk" will create a slice for FreeBSD covering the complete disk. A slice is what MICROS~1 calls "primary partition". Now the conclusion: Let's say you create a slice on ad0

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-02 Thread Pieter Donche
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Polytropon wrote: ad0 |---| the whole disk ad0s1 \--/ one slice ad0s1X \--/\---/\-/\-/\---/\/ partitions a b d e f g

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-02 Thread Polytropon
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:56:44 +0100 (CET), Pieter Donche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If FreeBSD is to put on the system as only operating system (Fdisk: > "A = Use Entire disk"), then will the BSD-partitions will show up as > ad0a (/), ad0b (swap), ad0d (/var) etc... correct or not (then what)? Yo