On 09/03/2010 17:58, Pongthep Kulkrisada wrote:
* RW (rwmailli...@googlemail.com) wrote:
that should be RELENG_8_0
Sorry for typo, but actually I only appended to the existing supfile.
Thing goes well.
Stable is a stable development branch, if you want to use
freebsd-update you need to use a
Hi Folk,
Further to previous suggestion in this mailing list,
I have just updated from FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE to the latest patch.
I firstly use freebsd-update but it failed ...
# freebsd-update fetch
Lookin up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found
Fetching public key from
Hi Folk,
Further to previous suggestion in this mailing list,
I have just updated from FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE to the latest patch.
I firstly use freebsd-update but it failed ...
# freebsd-update fetch
Lookin up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found
Fetching public key from
Hi--
On Mar 9, 2010, at 8:07 AM, Pongthep Kulkrisada wrote:
Further to previous suggestion in this mailing list,
I have just updated from FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE to the latest patch.
This is good.
I firstly use freebsd-update but it failed ...
[ ...Colin Percival is the owner of this, so I won't
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 23:07:34 +0700
Pongthep Kulkrisada ptkris...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Folk,
Further to previous suggestion in this mailing list,
I have just updated from FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE to the latest patch.
I firstly use freebsd-update but it failed ...
# freebsd-update fetch
Lookin up
* Chuck Swiger (cswi...@mac.com) wrote:
If you track RELENG_8, you get -STABLE system from a build cycle. If you
track RELENG_8_0, you are tracking the security branch and get your own
official -RELEASE system from the build cycle.
http://www.freebsd.org/security/ says:
Supported FreeBSD
* RW (rwmailli...@googlemail.com) wrote:
that should be RELENG_8_0
Sorry for typo, but actually I only appended to the existing supfile.
Thing goes well.
Stable is a stable development branch, if you want to use
freebsd-update you need to use a proper release security branch.
Does that mean
