Greetings.
I would like to switch from Linux to FreeBSD, but am puzzled by the
timeliness of the ports. In particular, I use a drawing program called
asymptote quite heavily in my work. From the ports page I noticed that
the ports version is approximately 14 months old:
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 19:14 +0300, Jarmo Hurri wrote:
I would like to switch from Linux to FreeBSD, but am puzzled by the
timeliness of the ports. In particular, I use a drawing program called
asymptote quite heavily in my work. From the ports page I noticed that
the ports version is
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 19:14:48 +0300
Jarmo Hurri jarmo.hu...@syk.fi wrote:
Greetings.
I would like to switch from Linux to FreeBSD, but am puzzled by the
timeliness of the ports. In particular, I use a drawing program called
The extent to which any given port is kept up to date
Steve O'Hara-Smith st...@sohara.org writes:
2. Try to become a maintainer. How?
Step one would be to try bringing the port up to date yourself,
sometimes it is as easy as editing the Makefile, changing the version
and running make makesum to update the checksums. Sometimes the
Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net writes:
Have you tested Debian's FreeBSD port? Debian GNU/kFreeBSD perhaps
does provide a more current user space.
https://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD
Hmm, I think I would prefer a distribution with a relatively large user
base. The Wikipedia
On 8/25/2013 2:39 PM, Carmel wrote:
Using portupgrade-devel-20130718,3 installed from the ports system,
attempting to update texlive-base always ends like this:
--- Build of print/texlive-base ended at: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:25:25 -0400
(consumed 00:11:57)
--- Updating dependency info
the 'missing' line I
was looking for)
Just as a last comment, I've found this 'normal line' on stable branch
(but not on release/releng):
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/8/UPDATING?view=log
Revision
*251500*http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=251500 -
(viewhttp
Note that, as opposed to you, I'm tracking 8-STABLE and not 8.4-RELEASE !
UPDATING:
$FreeBSD: src/UPDATING,v 1.632.2.39 2013/08/23 15:21:39 svnexp Exp $
newvers.sh:
# $FreeBSD: src/sys/conf/newvers.sh,v 1.83.2.25 2013/08/07 08:26:07 svnexp
Exp $
I'll check our clusters of firewalls to see
was
looking for)
Just as a last comment, I've found this 'normal line' on stable branch (but
not on release/releng):
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/8/UPDATING?view=log
Revision *251500*http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=251500
-
(viewhttp://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable
some circunstances).
(BTW, You're right, on 8-STABLE branch, it appears the 'missing' line I
was looking for)
Just as a last comment, I've found this 'normal line' on stable branch
(but not on release/releng):
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/8/UPDATING?view=log
Revision
*251500*http
Dear Sirs,
Just for curious, today I was looking for the date/entry that belongs to
FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE inside UPDATING file, with no luck.
Maybe I've made a mistake and I was looking inside a wrong file/url?
It doesn't appear, neither
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/release/8.4.0/UPDATING
From:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 75631 Aug 27 12:46 /usr/src/UPDATING
20130607:
8.4-RELEASE.
On 3 September 2013 18:16, Pablo Carboni pcarb...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Sirs,
Just for curious, today I was looking for the date/entry that belongs to
FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE inside
-- 1 root wheel 74967 Sep 3 12:11 /usr/src/UPDATING
The 'grepped' lines, shows me:
8.3-RELEASE
[...]
8.0-RELEASE
(But 8.4 still doesn't appear).
(However, while grepping first lines in /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh shows
me:
# $FreeBSD: releng/8.4/sys/conf/newvers.sh 254632 2013-08-22 00:51
Using portupgrade-devel-20130718,3 installed from the ports system,
attempting to update texlive-base always ends like this:
--- Build of print/texlive-base ended at: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:25:25 -0400
(consumed 00:11:57)
--- Updating dependency info
--- Modifying /var/db/pkg/texlive-full
2013/8/25 Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com:
Using portupgrade-devel-20130718,3 installed from the ports system,
attempting to update texlive-base always ends like this:
--- Build of print/texlive-base ended at: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:25:25 -0400
(consumed 00:11:57)
--- Updating dependency info
Hello,
I have bumped into your site while seeking for software and found your
website very interesting :)
Just a quick note, http://www.phpwizard.net/ is no longer active, and you
are linking to it from page - http://www.freebsddiary.org/polls.php
I was wondering if you don't mind updating
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 08:43:13AM +0200, Aymeric Mansoux wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, August 10, 2013 6:03 pm, Nikola Pavlović wrote:
On 09/08/13 18:40, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I've given up on all OS distribution-based TexLive drops. I install
texlive manually from their installer
Same here. I
Hello,
On Sat, August 10, 2013 6:03 pm, Nikola PavloviÄ wrote:
On 09/08/13 18:40, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I've given up on all OS distribution-based TexLive drops. I install
texlive manually from their installer and then run tlmgr under
cron control nightly to keep it up-to-date. I do this on
) as well as all
linux instances in my environment. It makes things a lot simpler.
I have to admit that I am somewhat confused myself. Why the port was
released sans any viable method of updating the packages seems counter
productive.
I know for a fact that this problem does not exist on an MS
On 09/08/13 18:40, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I've given up on all OS distribution-based TexLive drops. I install
texlive manually from their installer and then run tlmgr under
cron control nightly to keep it up-to-date. I do this on
FreeBSD (my primary dev and server platform) as well as all
Port: texlive-full-20120701
Path: /usr/ports/print/texlive-full
Info: TeX Live, Full Version
Maint: h...@freebsd.org
With: TEX_DEFAULT=texlive placed in the /etc/make.conf file.
My question is how do I update the packages since the package updater
has apparently been deliberately
On 08/09/2013 11:36 AM, Jerry wrote:
Port: texlive-full-20120701
Path: /usr/ports/print/texlive-full
Info: TeX Live, Full Version
Maint: h...@freebsd.org
With: TEX_DEFAULT=texlive placed in the /etc/make.conf file.
My question is how do I update the packages since the package updater
was wondering if you don't mind updating the link to the updated website
en.DownloadAstro.com (http://en.downloadastro.com/) - A great download site
with more than 300K software and games, including professional reviews and
user ratings.
We are now in a process of updating the links in websites all
updating the link to the updated website
en.DownloadAstro.com http://en.downloadastro.com/ - A great download
site with more than 300K software and games, including professional reviews
and user ratings.
We are now in a process of updating the links in websites all around the
world and I
updating the link to the updated
websitehttp://en.downloadastro.com http://en.downloadastro.com/- A
great download site with more than 300K software and games, including
professional reviews and user ratings.
We are now in a process of updating the links in websites all around the
world and I
I'm a longtime Debian user who is trying out FreeBSD, so very much a
newbie here.
I wanted to get spectrwm-2.2.0 which I found on www.freshports.org.
After a lot of googling I tried first cvsup and then svn, using the
command
svn co svn://svn.freshports.org/x11-wm/spectrwm
but it keeps timing
On 4/29/2013 14:33, Anthony Campbell wrote:
I'm a longtime Debian user who is trying out FreeBSD, so very much a
newbie here.
I wanted to get spectrwm-2.2.0 which I found on www.freshports.org.
After a lot of googling I tried first cvsup and then svn, using the
command
svn co
On 29/04/2013 19:33, Anthony Campbell wrote:
I'm a longtime Debian user who is trying out FreeBSD, so very much a
newbie here.
I wanted to get spectrwm-2.2.0 which I found on www.freshports.org.
After a lot of googling I tried first cvsup and then svn, using the
command
svn co
(./install.tex [5] [6] [7] [8]
Overfull \hbox (127.39917pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 231--232
[]\T1/phv/m/n/10 Note that com-pil-ing Doxy-wiz-ard cur-rently re-quires
Qt ver
-sion 4 (see [][]\T1/pcr/m/n/10
http-://qt.-nokia.-com/products/platform/qt-for
-windows[][]\T1/phv/m/n/10 ).
[9])
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:45:31 -0500, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
(./install.tex [5] [6] [7] [8]
Overfull \hbox (127.39917pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 231--232
[]\T1/phv/m/n/10 Note that com-pil-ing Doxy-wiz-ard cur-rently re-quires
Qt ver
-sion 4 (see [][]\T1/pcr/m/n/10
On 03/10/13 16:59, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:45:31 -0500, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
(./install.tex [5] [6] [7] [8]
Overfull \hbox (127.39917pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 231--232
[]\T1/phv/m/n/10 Note that com-pil-ing Doxy-wiz-ard cur-rently re-quires
Qt ver
-sion 4 (see
On 03/10/13 16:59, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:45:31 -0500, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
(./install.tex [5] [6] [7] [8]
Overfull \hbox (127.39917pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 231--232
[]\T1/phv/m/n/10 Note that com-pil-ing Doxy-wiz-ard cur-rently re-quires
Qt ver
-sion 4 (see
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 17:00:57 -0500, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
On 03/10/13 16:59, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:45:31 -0500, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
(./install.tex [5] [6] [7] [8]
Overfull \hbox (127.39917pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 231--232
[]\T1/phv/m/n/10 Note that
On 03/10/13 17:06, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 17:00:57 -0500, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
snip
Is the file /usr/local/share/doc/doxygen/html/infoflow.gif
present on your system?
nope, but I do have:
ls in
index.htmlinfoflow.png install.html
That looks valid (I'm on a much
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 17:11:59 -0500, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
On 03/10/13 17:06, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 17:00:57 -0500, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
snip
Is the file /usr/local/share/doc/doxygen/html/infoflow.gif
present on your system?
nope, but I do have:
ls in
FreeBSD-8.3 STABLE
gpg (GnuPG) 2.0.19
libgcrypt 1.5.0
gpa 0.9.3
When attempting to run 'gpa', I am greeted with an error message. The
message can be viewed here: http://www.seibercom.net/logs/gpa_error.png
It seems to indicate that there is a problem with the GPG library
returning an unexpected
you failed to update a dependency somewhere, or missed a
notice in UPDATING (perhaps the required rebuild of everything depending
on gnutls in a 20130205 entry)?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
On 10/28/2012 03:00 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
PKGNG is a replacement for the pkg_* tools that record package data in
/var/db/pkg.
It also allows for binary package upgrades.
If you are wanting to use pkgng for binary packages, there's no need to
use portupgrade anymore. Just 'pkg install name',
On 10/28/2012 2:16 AM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On 10/28/2012 03:00 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
PKGNG is a replacement for the pkg_* tools that record package data in
/var/db/pkg.
It also allows for binary package upgrades.
If you are wanting to use pkgng for binary packages, there's no need
PKGNG
Packages are not yet suported. Use pkg(8) directly.
That doesn't sound like portupgrade supports pkgng, or did I misread
the message in the UPDATING file?
pkg is able to make packages upgrade by itself. I think the good way
to update with packages is pkg updgrade then portupgrade to build
Got it.
Thanks.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 10/28/2012 04:27 PM, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
pkg is able to make packages upgrade by itself. I think the good way
to update with packages is pkg updgrade then portupgrade to build the
ports without packages avalaible.
Anyway I had many problems with portupgrade and pkg (basically It was
Quick question about portupgrade's support for pkgng.
The /usr/ports/UPDATING says:
20121015:
AFFECTS: users of ports-mgmt/portupgrade
AUTHOR: bdrew...@freebsd.org
Portupgrade now supports pkgng. To use pkgng, enable it in your
make.conf,
and convert your databases
?
STDERR.puts Packages are not yet suported. Use pkg(8) directly.
return 0
end
Original Message
Subject:re: Portupgrade now supports pkgng [/usr/ports/UPDATING]
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 21:22:32 +0300
From: Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps
On 10/27/2012 1:22 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
Quick question about portupgrade's support for pkgng.
The /usr/ports/UPDATING says:
20121015:
AFFECTS: users of ports-mgmt/portupgrade
AUTHOR: bdrew...@freebsd.org
Portupgrade now supports pkgng. To use pkgng, enable it in your
I am working on switching from updating my systems with csup to
subversion, for the systems I have behind a proxy server. When I was
using csup, I used an SSH connection, tunneling the 5999 port through
the proxy server. Now that I am looking at subversion, I have found the
~/.subverison
On 2012-10-05 10:16, dweimer wrote:
I am working on switching from updating my systems with csup to
subversion, for the systems I have behind a proxy server. When I was
using csup, I used an SSH connection, tunneling the 5999 port through
the proxy server. Now that I am looking at subversion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/4/12 10:16 AM, Howard Leadmon wrote:
See inline..
-Original Message- Subject: Re: Trouble updating Sources
via subversion?
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 09:27-0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
OK, I have over the past few years updated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/4/12 10:31 AM, Howard Leadmon wrote:
[...]
Hi Howard,
I know this doesn't answer the question about the svn problems
you've been encountering, but have you considered using portsnap
to keep your /usr/ports tree up to date? One of
On 08/21/12 22:48, Toomas Aas wrote:
Tue, 17 Jul 2012 kirjutas Lars Eighner luvbeas...@larseighner.com:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Toomas Aas wrote:
Hello!
I'm having this problem on two different computers, one running
8.3-STABLE and the other running 9.0-STABLE. After updating Firefox
from
Tue, 17 Jul 2012 kirjutas Lars Eighner luvbeas...@larseighner.com:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Toomas Aas wrote:
Hello!
I'm having this problem on two different computers, one running
8.3-STABLE and the other running 9.0-STABLE. After updating Firefox
from 12.0 to 13.0.1, whenever I access
. After updating Firefox
from 12.0 to 13.0.1, whenever I access twitter.com, I can log in
but after that a message appears saying that Twitter.com is
loading slowly, and the site is practically unusable - clicking on
any of the links has no effect.
If you do not know
I've been using cvsup for upgrading all of my installations for more years
than I want to remember. I just detected that I have a problem.
Configuration:
supfile=/usr/local/etc/cvs-supfile and contains:
*default tag=RELENG_9
*default host=cvsup15.freebsd.org
*default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup
18.07.2012 4:01, Wojciech Puchar пишет:
and the other running 9.0-STABLE. After updating Firefox from 12.0 to
13.0.1, whenever I access twitter.com, I can log in but after that a
message appears saying that Twitter.com is loading slowly, and the
site is practically unusable - clicking on any
Hello!
I'm having this problem on two different computers, one running
8.3-STABLE and the other running 9.0-STABLE. After updating Firefox
from 12.0 to 13.0.1, whenever I access twitter.com, I can log in but
after that a message appears saying that Twitter.com is loading
slowly
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Toomas Aas wrote:
Hello!
I'm having this problem on two different computers, one running 8.3-STABLE
and the other running 9.0-STABLE. After updating Firefox from 12.0 to 13.0.1,
whenever I access twitter.com, I can log in but after that a message appears
saying
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/17/12 7:56 AM, Toomas Aas wrote:
Hello!
I'm having this problem on two different computers, one running
8.3-STABLE and the other running 9.0-STABLE. After updating Firefox
from 12.0 to 13.0.1, whenever I access twitter.com, I can log
and the other running 9.0-STABLE. After updating Firefox from 12.0 to 13.0.1,
whenever I access twitter.com, I can log in but after that a message appears
saying that Twitter.com is loading slowly, and the site is practically
unusable - clicking on any of the links has no effect.
i don't
El día Tuesday, July 17, 2012 a las 07:01:28PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar escribió:
whenever I access twitter.com, I can log in but after that a message
appears
saying that Twitter.com is loading slowly, and the site is practically
unusable - clicking on any of the links has no effect.
I have tried the available package update methods. It occurred to me to
experiment with a different way.
I am working on a package update script in Python as an alternate way to
update installed packages with latest available on the FreeBSD web site. It
parses the index page of the web site and
I think I solved it with cvsup, but still no clue why it doesn't work
via sysinstall J-(
br,
Jos Chrispijn
Jos Chrispijn:
I want to compile my kernel and I read that for this I need to have
the complete /SRC tree installed.
If I do this via sysinstall, I get either a display that the chosen
Hi Michael,
that works, thanks.
BR,
Jos Chrispijn
Michael Ross:
Am 22.05.2012, 21:59 Uhr, schrieb Michael Ross g...@ross.cx:
Am 22.05.2012, 21:43 Uhr, schrieb Jos Chrispijn ker...@webrz.net:
I want to compile my kernel and I read that for this I need to have
the complete /SRC tree
On 21/05/2012 23:23, Antonio Olivares wrote:
Dear folks,
I have an acer-aspire 1 netbook running FreeBSD 9.0 i386. It was
working beautifully, but after todays updates, X no longer works.
I have a similar problem. I have a Dell Inspiron 1318 running 9.0 amd. I
use KDE4 (kde-4.7.4_1). After
Hi all,
same problem here as well. Apparently this is in relation to updating
Cairo. See the thread on the forum:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?p=178116
= downgrade Cairo to 1.10
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/graphics/cairo/distinfo
Would be good to see this fixed
I want to compile my kernel and I read that for this I need to have the
complete /SRC tree installed.
If I do this via sysinstall, I get either a display that the chosen
server is not available or these are not available for FreeBSD 9.
Is there a way to update /src by CVSUP or otherwise?
Am 22.05.2012, 21:43 Uhr, schrieb Jos Chrispijn ker...@webrz.net:
I want to compile my kernel and I read that for this I need to have the
complete /SRC tree installed.
If I do this via sysinstall, I get either a display that the chosen
server is not available or these are not available for
Am 22.05.2012, 21:59 Uhr, schrieb Michael Ross g...@ross.cx:
Am 22.05.2012, 21:43 Uhr, schrieb Jos Chrispijn ker...@webrz.net:
I want to compile my kernel and I read that for this I need to have the
complete /SRC tree installed.
If I do this via sysinstall, I get either a display that the
Dear folks,
I have an acer-aspire 1 netbook running FreeBSD 9.0 i386. It was
working beautifully, but after todays updates, X no longer works.
On screen I have
drm0: Intel i945GME on vgapci0
info: [drm] AGP at 0x2000 256MB
info: [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730
I have also:
Dear folks,
I have an acer-aspire 1 netbook running FreeBSD 9.0 i386. It was
working beautifully, but after todays updates, X no longer works.
On screen I have
drm0: Intel i945GME on vgapci0
info: [drm] AGP at 0x2000 256MB
info: [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730
I have also:
On 03/05/2012 23:43, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Amazingly, this very question was covered on this list within the last few
hours. grin
It's not that much of a coincidence. We always get a rash of queries
like this every time there's a security advisory and consequently a lot
of people are updating
On 03/05/2012 22:52, Mike Brown wrote:
For example, with this latest OpenSSL security update, running
'freebsd-update
fetch' says (among other things) The following files will be updated as part
of updating to 8.2-RELEASE-p7 and WARNING: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3 is
approaching its End
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri May 4 02:54:56 2012
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 08:52:24 +0100
From: Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: freebsd-update not updating reported patchlevel
On 03/05/2012 23:43, Robert Bonomi
-ordering them
in upside-down (newest version on top) would be better? Of course,
this would not go well with the log idea. Files like UPDATING
in the /usr/ports and /usr/src tree use such an approach.
Such a log file would not feel comfortable in /etc, it should
rather go to /var or even /var/log
Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2012 04:14:05 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi wrote:
What is required is a differentation between the _kernel_ revision level,
and the patchlevel of the entire base system.
Store the kernel revision level -in- the kernel. Use the 'standard'
On 2012-05-04 10:45, Polytropon wrote:
Allow me to extent the approach: For -STABLE versions (e. g. if
updated per CVS), those files could contain the build number
and the date of the currently installed -STABLE snapshot.
A separation of a kernel version file and a world version
file is useful
First of all, thanks for explaining your point of view.
Allow me to add a few thoughts:
On Fri, 4 May 2012 11:44:49 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi wrote:
Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2012 04:14:05 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi wrote:
What is required is a differentation
On 4 May 2012, at 16:45, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2012 04:14:05 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi wrote:
What is required is a differentation between the _kernel_ revision level,
and the patchlevel of the entire base system.
Store the kernel revision level -in- the kernel.
On Fri, 4 May 2012 16:45:51 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi wrote:
Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
First of all, thanks for explaining your point of view.
Allow me to add a few thoughts:
On Fri, 4 May 2012 11:44:49 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi wrote:
Polytropon free...@edvax.de
The following message appears when I do
freebsd-update install
The following files will be added as part of updating to 8.2-RELEASE-p7:
/usr/src/lib/libc/gen/libc_dlopen.c
The following files will be updated as part of updating to 8.2-RELEASE-p7:
/boot/kernel/kernel
/lib/libcrypto.so.6
/usr
2012-05-03 19:04, Leslie Jensen skrev:
The following message appears when I do
freebsd-update install
The following files will be added as part of updating to 8.2-RELEASE-p7:
/usr/src/lib/libc/gen/libc_dlopen.c
The following files will be updated as part of updating to 8.2-RELEASE-p7
On Thu 2012-05-03 19:17:05 UTC+0200, Leslie Jensen (les...@eskk.nu) wrote:
After a reboot my system now has the following label
FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3 #0
How come it downgrades the label from p6 to p3 when upgrading to p7.
This is a FAQ. There's a thread about it here:
2012-05-03 20:35, andrew clarke skrev:
On Thu 2012-05-03 19:17:05 UTC+0200, Leslie Jensen (les...@eskk.nu) wrote:
After a reboot my system now has the following label
FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3 #0
How come it downgrades the label from p6 to p3 when upgrading to p7.
This is a FAQ. There's a
On Thu 2012-05-03 20:48:17 UTC+0200, Leslie Jensen (les...@eskk.nu) wrote:
Short answer: The patch level (-p3) displayed by uname -r after a
reboot will not change if freebsd-update has not touched the kernel.
...
I have read similar answers and was partly aware of this.
But I was just
, running 'freebsd-update
fetch' says (among other things) The following files will be updated as part
of updating to 8.2-RELEASE-p7 and WARNING: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3 is
approaching its End-of-Life date. It is strongly recommended that you upgrade
to a newer release within the next 2 months
Mike Brown m...@skew.org wrote;
I installed 8.2-RELEASE when it was new, and have been just using
freebsd-update since then. I run freebsd-update whenever there are new
critical patches. But for some reason, my system's reported patchlevel number
hasn't updated since p3.
[sneck]
But
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:18:35 -0700
Doug Barton articulated:
On 04/04/2012 05:27, Jerry wrote:
The answer then is to simply do what has been done with other ports
that have numerous major version numbers; i.e. Bash, MySQL,
etcetera. Create a GnuTLS-2 and a GnuTLS-3 port and maintain the
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:06:57 -0500
Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com wrote:
Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:53:39 -0600
Mark Felder f...@feld.me wrote:
For the life of me I can't work around this xcb-util issue. This is
a pretty fresh install and I have not made
Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:53:39 -0600
Mark Felder f...@feld.me wrote:
For the life of me I can't work around this xcb-util issue. This is
a pretty fresh install and I have not made any workaround symlinks.
I ran:
# portmaster -R -r xcb-util-0
And the problem
For the life of me I can't work around this xcb-util issue. This is a
pretty fresh install and I have not made any workaround symlinks.
I ran:
# portmaster -R -r xcb-util-0
And the problem persists. It didn't even complete all the packages because
some were still erroring on missing xcb
On 25.01.2012 09:52, Mark wrote:
I got stuck in this hell the other day, I had to do this.
portmaster --check-depends
to see if anything is missing
then
portmaster -a -f
I want to report back that this did end up working pretty darn well.
:-) THANKS!
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:53:39 -0600
Mark Felder f...@feld.me wrote:
For the life of me I can't work around this xcb-util issue. This is
a pretty fresh install and I have not made any workaround symlinks.
I ran:
# portmaster -R -r xcb-util-0
And the problem persists. It didn't even
. There is a LOCAL_PATCHES variable, but it seems to apply only
to 'make release'.
If possible, I would like to avoid writing custom scripts for updating
and building world, because at some point I will forget to use the
script and build everything without the patches. How can I preserve
the current behavior
. There is a LOCAL_PATCHES variable, but it seems to apply
only to 'make release'.
If possible, I would like to avoid writing custom scripts for
updating and building world, because at some point I will forget
to use the script and build everything without the patches. How
can I preserve
I run 'make update' in /usr/src, csup overwrites all local
changes. There is a LOCAL_PATCHES variable, but it seems to apply only
to 'make release'.
If possible, I would like to avoid writing custom scripts for updating
and building world, because at some point I will forget to use the
script
functionality for building FreeBSD world and
kernel?
When I run 'make update' in /usr/src, csup overwrites all local
changes. There is a LOCAL_PATCHES variable, but it seems to apply only
to 'make release'.
If possible, I would like to avoid writing custom scripts for updating
and building world
'.
If possible, I would like to avoid writing custom scripts for updating
and building world, because at some point I will forget to use the
script and build everything without the patches. How can I preserve
the current behavior of running 'make update make buildworld
buildkernel' while automatically
Hello,
I'm trying to update my FreeBSD install on two servers. They are
mostly identical. So, I've builded world and kernel on first srv,
updated it, without any problems. Then exported /usr/src and /usr/obj
by NFS to another machine, then installed kernel, but can't install
world. It says:
Артем Каялайнен wrote:
I don't have any options in make.conf on first machine, nor on second
machine. I've googled a little and found, that _p is profiling library
and it can be ignored with -DNO_PROFILE option. But in this case,
How about compairing /etc/src.conf?
--
Sphinx of black quartz
2012/1/11 Volodymyr Kostyrko c.kw...@gmail.com:
How about compairing /etc/src.conf?
Wow, you are 100% right. My bad. Thanks.
---
With Best Regards / Ystävällisin terveisin
Artem Kajalainen
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 390, Issue 1, Message: 18
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 01:47:27 + Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk wrote:
I'm planning to install FreeBSD alongside a whole range of Windows
builds for testing. In 8.x it's possible to tell the installer not to
bother updating the MBR
1 - 100 of 1036 matches
Mail list logo
