Re: VLANs is this right?

2010-07-05 Thread David Kelly
On Jul 5, 2010, at 5:59 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote: On 2010.07.05 12:57, David Kelly wrote: On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 10:16:19AM -0600, Modulok wrote: Criteria: - HostA must never directly talk to HostB. - Both hostA and hostB have an Internet connection. What I have to work with: proC

Re: VLANs is this right?

2010-07-05 Thread Steve Bertrand
On 2010.07.05 12:57, David Kelly wrote: > On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 10:16:19AM -0600, Modulok wrote: >> >> Criteria: >> - HostA must never directly talk to HostB. >> - Both hostA and hostB have an Internet connection. >> >> What I have to work with: >> proCurve switch which supports VLANs

Re: VLANs is this right?

2010-07-05 Thread Steve Bertrand
On 2010.07.05 14:36, Nathan Vidican wrote: > On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Modulok wrote: > >> It was a simplified diagram of what I thought I needed. ( Which may or >> may not be what I actually need! ) >> >> Basically, I want a port on the switch that I can plug un-trusted >> devices into. Sy

Re: VLANs is this right?

2010-07-05 Thread David Kelly
On Jul 5, 2010, at 12:30 PM, Modulok wrote: > It was a simplified diagram of what I thought I needed. ( Which may or > may not be what I actually need! ) > > Basically, I want a port on the switch that I can plug un-trusted > devices into. Seconding Peter's request that you not top-post. We re

Re: VLANs is this right?

2010-07-05 Thread Nathan Vidican
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Modulok wrote: > It was a simplified diagram of what I thought I needed. ( Which may or > may not be what I actually need! ) > > Basically, I want a port on the switch that I can plug un-trusted > devices into. Systems wich are known to be just crawling with > mali

Re: VLANs is this right?

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Boosten
On 5 jul 2010, at 19:30, Modulok wrote: > It was a simplified diagram of what I thought I needed. ( Which may or > may not be what I actually need! ) > > Basically, I want a port on the switch that I can plug un-trusted > devices into. Systems wich are known to be just crawling with > malicious

Re: VLANs is this right?

2010-07-05 Thread Modulok
It was a simplified diagram of what I thought I needed. ( Which may or may not be what I actually need! ) Basically, I want a port on the switch that I can plug un-trusted devices into. Systems wich are known to be just crawling with malicious software. I need to provide them with an Internet conn

{Spam?} Re: VLANs is this right?

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Boosten
On 5 jul 2010, at 18:16, Modulok wrote: > Hopefully this doesn't get too garbled by various mail clients: > > Internet > | > FreeBSD router > | > (tagged frames) > | > switch > || > vlan1 vlan2 > || > hostAhostB > > Criteria: >- HostA must never directly t

Re: VLANs is this right?

2010-07-05 Thread David Kelly
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 10:16:19AM -0600, Modulok wrote: > > Criteria: > - HostA must never directly talk to HostB. > - Both hostA and hostB have an Internet connection. > > What I have to work with: > proCurve switch which supports VLANs. > 2x Intel NICs in FreeBSD which support

VLANs is this right?

2010-07-05 Thread Modulok
Hopefully this doesn't get too garbled by various mail clients: Internet | FreeBSD router | (tagged frames) | switch || vlan1 vlan2 || hostAhostB Criteria: - HostA must never directly talk to HostB. - Both hostA and hostB have an Internet connectio