Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-04 Thread Rodolfo Pellegrino
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Leandro F Silva fsilvalean...@gmail.comwrote: Hey guys, Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ .. We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060 I voted and added a coment: *

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-04 Thread herbert langhans
Yep, I am in. I signed here: http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060 and also there: http://www.petitiononline.com/flash4me/petition.html Its the last thing I need to have a full native FreeBSD environment. Maybe you should dig out this thread after some weeks again, Leandro. I guess we can

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-04 Thread James Phillips
Message: 29 Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 23:45:18 -0600 From: Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: 20091004054518.gd37...@guilt.hydra Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sat, Oct 03

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-04 Thread jhell
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 08:33 -0700, anti_spam256@ wrote: Message: 29 Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 23:45:18 -0600 From: Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: 20091004054518.gd37...@guilt.hydra Content

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-04 Thread yblent8
-- Leandro F Silva wrote : Hey guys, Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ .. We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060 ___ freebsd-questi...@free... mailing list

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-04 Thread Oliver Fromme
Leandro F Silva fsilvalean...@gmail.com wrote: Hey guys, Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ .. The latest Linuxulator works quite well on -current with the Linux flash binary + pluginwrapper port, doesn't it? Works for me, at least. We just have to create an

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-04 Thread James Phillips
--- On Sun, 10/4/09, jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote: From: jhell jh...@dataix.net Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player To: James Phillips anti_spam...@yahoo.ca Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: Sunday, October 4, 2009, 1:07 PM On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 08:33

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-04 Thread Gary Kline
On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 10:01:14PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: Leandro F Silva fsilvalean...@gmail.com wrote: Hey guys, Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ .. The latest Linuxulator works quite well on -current with the Linux flash binary + pluginwrapper port,

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
Lucian @ lastdot.org wrote: On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 08:15:07PM -0500, J Sisson wrote: And if enough people petition Microsoft, we can get them to release Windows 7 source under the GPL. Reality called...your request to

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-03 Thread Robert Huff
Rolf G Nielsen writes: Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ .. Where do I vote to have them continue forever not creating a FreeBSD version of that crap? Is your objection to Flash in particular, or to any product in that specific niche?

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-03 Thread James Phillips
-- Message: 9 Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 06:28:29 +0100 From: Lucian @ lastdot.org luc...@lastdot.org Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID:     5a3c8f45091008k3c196b6ay1acc3031716d6

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-03 Thread Chad Perrin
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 08:50:16AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: Google apparently favours HTML-5 as their future direction, rather than Flash. And where YouTube goes, the rest of the world will surely follow, at least as far as Video streaming is concerned. Oh, thank goodness. Flash video

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-03 Thread Chad Perrin
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 07:56:53AM +0200, Rolf G Nielsen wrote: Where do I vote to have them continue forever not creating a FreeBSD version of that crap? If you s/Free/Open/ I think the question answers itself. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-03 Thread Chad Perrin
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 09:04:00AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: Rolf G Nielsen writes: Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ .. Where do I vote to have them continue forever not creating a FreeBSD version of that crap? Is your objection to Flash in

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-03 Thread Chad Perrin
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 08:01:07AM -0700, James Phillips wrote: I have this fantasy that if I design and build a better streaming video format, They (broadcasters) will use it, if properly marketed. It may be a fantasy, but as fantasies go, it's not a bad one. This would be despite the

Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-02 Thread Leandro F Silva
Hey guys, Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ .. We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-02 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
Good luck the community has tried for years to get it and adobe seems to not care Leandro F Silva wrote: Hey guys, Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ .. We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-02 Thread J Sisson
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.comwrote: Good luck the community has tried for years to get it and adobe seems to not care Leandro F Silva wrote: Hey guys, Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ .. We just have to create an

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-02 Thread Chad Perrin
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 08:15:07PM -0500, J Sisson wrote: And if enough people petition Microsoft, we can get them to release Windows 7 source under the GPL. Reality called...your request to ignore it was denied. Actually, we *could*. The problem is the definition of enough. I'm sure

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-02 Thread Lucian @ lastdot.org
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 08:15:07PM -0500, J Sisson wrote: And if enough people petition Microsoft, we can get them to release Windows 7 source under the GPL. Reality called...your request to ignore it was denied.

Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player

2009-10-02 Thread Rolf G Nielsen
Leandro F Silva wrote: Hey guys, Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ .. We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list