> Hmm. If this unused slice is very tiny (less than 1% of the total
> capacity),
> it may be the remainder of the disk which unused due to the way the
> partition
> table values get rounded.
>
> I suppose I've gotten used to only being able to fit 80 or so "real
> megabytes"
> onto a "100MB drive"
Thomas Beer wrote:
[ ... ]
What seems strange between 4.x and 5.x in the fdisk partition
table is, after deleting the slice yet to install FBSD
and create a FBSD slice 4.x simple deletes and creates the
slice, 5.x adds an additional unused "slice".
Hmm. If this unused slice is very tiny (less than
> If the installer sees your existing XP and manufacturer service
> partitions,
> and they seem OK in terms of size, most likely everything is fine and you
> can
> ignore the warning about the geometry being incorrect.
What seems strange between 4.x and 5.x in the fdisk partition
table is, after d
Thomas Beer wrote:
I searched the web, archives and asked in some mailing lists
with no satisfactory solution. The situation is an Thinkpad
T42 with a 60GB harddisk, XP as well preinstalled as a service
partition. Repartitioning was unproblematic. If I try to
install any of the 5.x branch on t a fr
Dear All,
I searched the web, archives and asked in some mailing lists
with no satisfactory solution. The situation is an Thinkpad
T42 with a 60GB harddisk, XP as well preinstalled as a service
partition. Repartitioning was unproblematic. If I try to
install any of the 5.x branch on t a free prima
