698 days - Cyrus IMAP server.
Had to shut it down to move the server farm to another building...
On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 06:41, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 9:45 AM +0100 9/3/04, Andy Holyer wrote:
> >I explained that generally some upgrade comes along that requires
> >a reboot, but I realized th
Hugo Silva writes:
> I try never to reboot my servers, only when critical security
> updates are issued. The reason for this is I work with shell
> providers mostly, and the uptime is a big factor for the clients.
Surely these folks can afford a spare machine on which to do
systems de
"Hugo Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've had a 4.8 server with 280 days uptime, then the motherboard burned :/
>
> I try never to reboot my servers, only when critical security updates are
> issued. The reason for this is I work with shell providers mostly, and the
> uptime is a big factor
At 9:45 AM +0100 9/3/04, Andy Holyer wrote:
I explained that generally some upgrade comes along that requires
a reboot, but I realized that I don't know how long a box would
stay up in the maximum. So, come on, this should be fun, what's
the biggest uptime you've ever had for a BSD box?
I don't thi
I've had a 4.8 server with 280 days uptime, then the motherboard burned :/
I try never to reboot my servers, only when critical security updates are
issued. The reason for this is I work with shell providers mostly, and the
uptime is a big factor for the clients.
But of course, if choosing to reb
--On Friday, September 03, 2004 10:55:09 AM -0400 Bill Moran
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Most of the servers I manage (which are all intended for 24/7 access)
see about 3 months between reboots. That's an average. Some servers
are more aggresively updated than others, and are rebooted more often.
--On Friday, September 03, 2004 09:15:00 AM -0500 "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo,
S.P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andy Holyer wrote:
The other day I was explaining something to my boss (a suit),
You're a patient one, then ...
and I mentioned that a FreeBSD box would easily run for a year or more.
"Oh
Robert Huff wrote:
Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. writes:
IIRC, Netcraft now claims that most
new FreeBSD builds "reset" to zero after 400-something days, so
some of their statistics may be no longer as valid...
From the NetCraft FAQ:
Why do some Operating Systems never show uptimes abov
Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. writes:
> I've heard accounts of boxen acting as, say, LAN routers or LAN file
> servers with uptimes of years.
Within the last year or two, I had a conversation with someone
who claimed to have a machine runn9ing 2.2.x (or maybe it was 2.1.x)
continuously
Andy Holyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The other day I was explaining something to my boss (a suit), and I
> mentioned that a FreeBSD box would easily run for a year or more. "Oh",
> he said, "and then you've got to reboot it?". I explained that
> generally some upgrade comes along that reqwu
Andy Holyer wrote:
The other day I was explaining something to my boss (a suit),
You're a patient one, then ...
and I mentioned that a FreeBSD box would easily run for a year or more.
"Oh", he said, "and then you've got to reboot it?". I explained that
generally
some upgrade comes along that req
On Friday 03 September 2004 01:45 am, Andy Holyer wrote:
> The other day I was explaining something to my boss (a suit), and I
> mentioned that a FreeBSD box would easily run for a year or more. "Oh",
> he said, "and then you've got to reboot it?". I explained that
> generally some upgrade comes al
The other day I was explaining something to my boss (a suit), and I
mentioned that a FreeBSD box would easily run for a year or more. "Oh",
he said, "and then you've got to reboot it?". I explained that
generally some upgrade comes along that reqwuires a reboot, but I
realized that I don't know
13 matches
Mail list logo
