Hey Mr(s) freebsd-questions show some good to me!
2011/07/17 23:08:16 -0400 ill...@gmail.com ill...@gmail.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
igc (Should be under contrib/xz )
archivers/xz
73! Peter pgp: A0E26627 (4A42 6841 2871 5EA7 52AB 12F8 0CE1 4AAC A0E2 6627)
--
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:36:07 +0400, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
Hey Mr(s) freebsd-questions show some good to me!
2011/07/17 23:08:16 -0400 ill...@gmail.com ill...@gmail.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
igc (Should be under contrib/xz )
archivers/xz
/usr/ports/archivers/xz on my
On 12 July 2011 10:02, Christian Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de wrote:
Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
Correct. I'm currently on 7-STABLE where it's not yet part of
the base system, but my new 8.2-STABLE also has it in /usr/bin.
I believe it has been introduced with version
Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
Correct. I'm currently on 7-STABLE where it's not yet part of
the base system, but my new 8.2-STABLE also has it in /usr/bin.
I believe it has been introduced with version 8...
It is part of '7.2-RELEASE',
It is not.
--
Christian naddy
Hi all,
I just downloaded FreeBSD-8.2-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.xz and the md5
checksum is correct. Can someone please tell me what does that xz at
the end stand for ? It looks like it stands for some kind of
compression (gzip/bzip2/some new format), but I can't figure out
exactly
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:53:17 +0530, Manish Jain wrote:
Hi all,
I just downloaded FreeBSD-8.2-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.xz and the md5
checksum is correct. Can someone please tell me what does that xz at
the end stand for ? It looks like it stands for some kind of
compression
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:53:17 +0530
Manish Jain invalid.poin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all, I just downloaded FreeBSD-8.2-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.xz and the md5
checksum is correct. Can someone please tell me what does that xz at the
end stand for ? It looks like it stands for some kind
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Manish Jain invalid.poin...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
I just downloaded FreeBSD-8.2-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.xz and the md5
checksum is correct. Can someone please tell me what does that xz at
the end stand for ? It looks like it stands for some kind
On 02/07/2011 07:38, Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:53:17 +0530, Manish Jain wrote:
Hi all,
I just downloaded FreeBSD-8.2-RELEASE-i386-dvd1.iso.xz and the md5
checksum is correct. Can someone please tell me what does that xz at
the end stand for ? It looks like
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 12:26:14 +0100, Chris Whitehouse wrote:
On 02/07/2011 07:38, Polytropon wrote:
It's xz compression, archivers/xz from ports, which is
...but before you install it you may find it is part of the base system.
%pkg_info -Ix xz
pkg_info: no packages match pattern(s)
me what does that
xz at the end stand for ? It looks like it stands for some kind of
compression (gzip/bzip2/some new format), but I can't figure
out exactly which one.
It's xz compression, archivers/xz from ports, which is
...but before you install it you may find it is part
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sat Jul 2 06:45:00 2011
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 13:43:55 +0200
From: Polytropon free...@edvax.de
To: Chris Whitehouse cwhi...@onetel.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: What is xz ?
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 12:26:14 +0100, Chris Whitehouse
From owner-freebsd-questions at freebsd.org Sat Jul 2 06:45:00 2011
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 13:43:55 +0200
From: Polytropon freebsd at edvax.de
To: Chris Whitehouse cwhiteh at onetel.com
Cc: freebsd-questions at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: What is xz ?
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 12:26:14
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 21:25:11 +
From: b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com
To: Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: What is xz ?
From owner-freebsd-questions at freebsd.org Sat Jul 2 06:45:00 2011
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 13:43:55 +0200
b. f. writes:
It is part of '7.2-RELEASE', Dunno about 7.1
Hmm. Are you sure? If this is true, the archivers/xz port needs
to be patched to IGNORE those branches of 7 that have xz.
Is that necessarily true?
For comparison: the default system compiler is gcc-4.2.1
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 17:51:38 -0500 (CDT)
Robert Bonomi articulated:
What I know is that I have a '7.2-RELEASE' i386 box, that's had
nothing done to it after the original 'sysinstall' (from CDs, no net
connectivity), as far as _adding_ anything. it does run a highly
customized kernel, but that
On 7/2/11, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
b. f. writes:
It is part of '7.2-RELEASE', Dunno about 7.1
Hmm. Are you sure? If this is true, the archivers/xz port needs
to be patched to IGNORE those branches of 7 that have xz.
Is that necessarily true?
For
17 matches
Mail list logo
