On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 14:04:36 -0400
Charles Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 1, 2004, at 10:08 AM, Bill Moran wrote:
> > Unless I'm mistaken, at one time turning on the sticky bit on a binary
> > would
> > tell the kernel not to swap out that program when it was running (or
> > somtehing
On Jun 1, 2004, at 10:08 AM, Bill Moran wrote:
Unless I'm mistaken, at one time turning on the sticky bit on a binary
would
tell the kernel not to swap out that program when it was running (or
somtehing similar ... I think it used to mean "kernel must never swap
out
this data")
That's right, alth
This may be better suited for hackers@, but I thought I'd bring it up here
to get perspective.
I was reading this article: http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/3202 and related
articles that it links to, and thinking - why did the sticky bit go away?
Unless I'm mistaken, at one time turning on the stick