Re: Which OS should we use?

--On Tuesday, January 11, 2005 05:48:41 PM -0800 sp0ng3b0b [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm in the same boat. I've had mixed results with 5.3. I advise you to test it out for your needs. If your hardware and apps play well together, go for it. As a web, mysql and samba server, I've had no problems.

Re: Which OS should we use?

--- Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --On Tuesday, January 11, 2005 05:48:41 PM -0800 sp0ng3b0b [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm in the same boat. I've had mixed results with 5.3. I advise you to test it out for your needs. If your hardware and apps play well together, go for it.

Re: Which OS should we use?

On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 03:22:15PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote: We're getting ready to create some new servers from scratch (format/install). We've been using 4.9 and 4.10 for a while now with no problems. We've got one 5.3 box setup for test purposes. On this list I have seen comments

Which OS should we use?

We're getting ready to create some new servers from scratch (format/install). We've been using 4.9 and 4.10 for a while now with no problems. We've got one 5.3 box setup for test purposes. On this list I have seen comments about instability issues in 5.3. These servers need to be stable.

Re: Which OS should we use?

In the immortal words of Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]... We're getting ready to create some new servers from scratch (format/install). We've been using 4.9 and 4.10 for a while now with no problems. We've got one 5.3 box setup for test purposes. On this list I have seen comments about

Re: Which OS should we use?

Paul Schmehl wrote: We're getting ready to create some new servers from scratch (format/install). We've been using 4.9 and 4.10 for a while now with no problems. We've got one 5.3 box setup for test purposes. On this list I have seen comments about instability issues in 5.3. These servers

Re: Which OS should we use?

On Jan 11, 2005, at 4:22 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: We're getting ready to create some new servers from scratch (format/install). We've been using 4.9 and 4.10 for a while now with no problems. We've got one 5.3 box setup for test purposes. On this list I have seen comments about instability

Re: Which OS should we use?

Thanks to those who provided (and may provide in the future) their responses to my question. I appreciate the input. Frankly, when I saw a recent post about instabilities in 5.3, I think I may have gotten overly concerned about it. The 5.3 server we have in test is working fine, so we'll

Re: Which OS should we use?

On Tuesday 11 January 2005 05:54 pm, Paul Schmehl wrote: Thanks to those who provided (and may provide in the future) their responses to my question. I appreciate the input. Frankly, when I saw a recent post about instabilities in 5.3, I think I may have gotten overly concerned about it.

Re: Which OS should we use?

Paul Schmehl wrote: We're getting ready to create some new servers from scratch (format/install). We've been using 4.9 and 4.10 for a while now with no problems. We've got one 5.3 box setup for test purposes. On this list I have seen comments about instability issues in 5.3. These servers

Re: Which OS should we use?

sp0ng3b0b wrote: I also know that Yahoo operates a lot of FreeBSD servers. I would love to hear their results if they are testing 5.3. Yahoo most likely runs some home-brewed version of FreeBSD. highly customized for their needs. -Frank ___

Re: Which OS should we use?

Frank J. Laszlo writes: FJL Yahoo most likely runs some home-brewed version of FreeBSD. highly FJL customized for their needs. Why do you say that? -- Anthony ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list