FreeBSD is a dying OS because netcraft.com confirms it that's the argument
used some of these guys, and I'm wondering what data are they using to make
but what's a point of such discussions at all?
let they use their favourite linux, You use FreeBSD.
that's all.
If you think FreeBSD is
FreeBSD is a dying OS because netcraft.com confirms it that's the
argument used some of these guys, and I'm wondering what data are they
using to make their point! Even netcraft is running FreeBSD and the
uptimes section I can see quite a few running FreeBSD and not one linux!
Is the data
On Tuesday 08 April 2008 21:32:01 E. J. Cerejo wrote:
FreeBSD is a dying OS because netcraft.com confirms it that's the
argument used some of these guys, and I'm wondering what data are they
using to make their point! Even netcraft is running FreeBSD and the
uptimes section I can see quite a
It would be helpful if you provided a URL for the article. I do not
think they mean that FreeBSD systems are dying in terms of crashing or
uptime. They might mean that the Free BSD community is not growing as
fast or staying as active as the Linux community.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 5:45 PM,
Pollywog wrote:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008 21:32:01 E. J. Cerejo wrote:
FreeBSD is a dying OS because netcraft.com confirms it that's the
argument used some of these guys, and I'm wondering what data are they
using to make their point! Even netcraft is running FreeBSD and the
uptimes section I
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:55:41 -0400
E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pollywog wrote:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008 21:32:01 E. J. Cerejo wrote:
FreeBSD is a dying OS because netcraft.com confirms it that's the
argument used some of these guys, and I'm wondering what data are they
using
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 05:55:41PM -0400, E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Pollywog wrote:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008 21:32:01 E. J. Cerejo wrote:
FreeBSD is a dying OS because netcraft.com confirms it that's the
argument used some of these guys, and I'm wondering what data are they
using to make their
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
FreeBSD is a dying OS because netcraft.com confirms it that's the
argument used some of these guys, and I'm wondering what data are they
using to make their point! Even netcraft is running FreeBSD and the
uptimes section I can see quite a few running FreeBSD and not one
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Pollywog wrote:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008 21:32:01 E. J. Cerejo wrote:
FreeBSD is a dying OS because netcraft.com confirms it that's the
argument used some of these guys, and I'm wondering what data are they
using to make their point! Even netcraft is running FreeBSD and
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Pollywog wrote:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008 21:32:01 E. J. Cerejo wrote:
FreeBSD is a dying OS because netcraft.com confirms it that's the
argument used some of these guys, and I'm wondering what data are they
using to make their point! Even netcraft is running FreeBSD and
http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1391352
- Original Message
From: Edward Capriolo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pollywog [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2008 4:51:53 PM
Subject: Re: Why are some linux users saying that FreeBSD is dying
It would
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:32:01 -0400, E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FreeBSD is a dying OS because netcraft.com confirms it that's the
argument used some of these guys, and I'm wondering what data are they
using to make their point! Even netcraft is running FreeBSD and the
uptimes
12 matches
Mail list logo