Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 17:20:26 -0500
From: ajtiM lum...@gmail.com
To: Polytropon free...@edvax.de
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: before new version
Message-ID: 201211031720.27182.lum...@gmail.com
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
On Saturday 03 November 2012 14
Hi!
Could someone explain, please why ports should be frozen before a new version
of FreeBSD came out?
It happened all the time and after update (if you update or not) there are so
many ports for updating. In case for very long waiting for version 9.1 will be
thousands of them.
Thank you very
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 11:23:12 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
Hi!
Could someone explain, please why ports should be frozen before a new version
of FreeBSD came out?
The idea is to make sure that RELEASE can be shipped with
installation media (CD, DVD) for offline use which requires
ports mostly to be
On Saturday 03 November 2012 12:18:35 Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 11:23:12 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
Hi!
Could someone explain, please why ports should be frozen before a new
version of FreeBSD came out?
The idea is to make sure that RELEASE can be shipped with
installation media
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 12:25:12 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
On Saturday 03 November 2012 12:18:35 Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 11:23:12 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
Hi!
Could someone explain, please why ports should be frozen before a new
version of FreeBSD came out?
The idea is to make
On Saturday 03 November 2012 14:11:22 you wrote:
BTW: packages are almost all the time outdated.
The packages in the RELEASE directory and on the installation
media meet the frozen ports tree (frozen _prior_ to the release
date), so yes, they are a bit outdated, but they are considered
