bsdlabel and c partition

2005-09-17 Thread Valerio daelli
Hi
I have partitioned a disk using bsdlabel and I have used
the c partition for the entire disk. According to the manual
this mean I have used the disk in dedicated mode.
Is there any danger in it?
Is it preferable to use another partition?
Thanks a lot.
 Valerio Daelli
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: bsdlabel and c partition

2005-09-17 Thread Glenn Dawson

At 11:23 PM 9/16/2005, Valerio daelli wrote:

Hi
I have partitioned a disk using bsdlabel and I have used
the c partition for the entire disk. According to the manual
this mean I have used the disk in dedicated mode.
Is there any danger in it?
Is it preferable to use another partition?


As long as you keep the disk away from other OS's you'll be 
fine.  Some utilities in FreeBSD will complain if you use the c 
partition.  Personally I've been using the a partition on freshly 
labeled disks recently, since it defaults to the whole disk minus the 
first 16 sectors.


-Glenn


Thanks a lot.
 Valerio Daelli
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: bsdlabel and c partition

2005-09-17 Thread Jerry McAllister
 
 Hi
 I have partitioned a disk using bsdlabel and I have used
 the c partition for the entire disk. According to the manual
 this mean I have used the disk in dedicated mode.

No, it does not mean you have used it in dedicated mode
(or 'dangerously dedicated' mode).   That is something else - basically
using the disk without slicing it - eg /dev/da0c rather than /dev/da0s1c. 
Both work.  The first makes some assumptions that some systems
will not follow.

 Is there any danger in it?
 Is it preferable to use another partition?

My preference is to use either an 'a' name for the partition
or possibly an 'e' name for the partition because e is past
all those that have traditional uses.   I don't think it is
supposed to be dangerous, but there may be some utilities that
make some assumptions about the meaning of a 'c' partition.

jerry

 Thanks a lot.
  Valerio Daelli
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: bsdlabel and c partition

2005-09-17 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
Valerio daelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Is it preferable to use another partition?

At least because /boot.config only works on a, it has been
recommened that a be used, and maybe because almost every one uses
it, I've never learned what bad things happen if you don't use a.
You're unlikely to ever use /boot.config, BTW.  5.4 didn't install one.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]