chroot versus jail for the name daemon

2004-06-12 Thread Robert Downes
Newbie Fodder (skip down the page if old and wise): The FreeBSD Handbook describes running BIND (named) in a sandbox, i.e. using chroot to force the named to think that its place in the filesystem is actually the filesystem root when it's not, so it sees /somewhere/deep/inthe/file/jungle as /.

Re: chroot versus jail for the name daemon

2004-06-12 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 12:53:41PM +0100, Robert Downes wrote: Questions (for the old and wise): So, are there any FreeBSD-internals masters who can answer the following: 1) What happens if named is broken with neither chroot nor jail, assuming named is running as user and group bind