Re: curious if anyone noticed the perl-5.8.0_04 seems a bit whacky ?

2003-02-06 Thread Stijn Hoop
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 07:01:10PM -0600, Sean O'Neill wrote: I just portupgraded from perl-5.8.0_01 to perl-5.8.0_04 - or more appropriately I tried. Anyone noticed that the perl-5.8.0_04 port installs stuff in /usr/local/scripts, e.g. h2ph and others, but a pkginfo -L shows these same

Re: curious if anyone noticed the perl-5.8.0_04 seems a bit whacky ?

2003-02-06 Thread Sean O'Neill
At 07:01 PM 2/5/2003 -0600, Sean O'Neill wrote: I just portupgraded from perl-5.8.0_01 to perl-5.8.0_04 - or more appropriately I tried. Anyone noticed that the perl-5.8.0_04 port installs stuff in /usr/local/scripts, e.g. h2ph and others, but a pkginfo -L shows these same files are being

curious if anyone noticed the perl-5.8.0_04 seems a bit whacky ?

2003-02-05 Thread Sean O'Neill
I just portupgraded from perl-5.8.0_01 to perl-5.8.0_04 - or more appropriately I tried. Anyone noticed that the perl-5.8.0_04 port installs stuff in /usr/local/scripts, e.g. h2ph and others, but a pkginfo -L shows these same files are being installed in /usr/local/bin. A problem with this is