Re: cutecom requires sudo to work, but minicom works without - permissions?

2008-04-20 Thread Vincent Barus
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Ruben de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:11:33AM -0500, Derek Ragona typed: At 07:39 PM 4/14/2008, Steve Franks wrote: I have two terminal programs - cutecom and minicom, both built from ports with no tweaks. Minicom will fire

Re: cutecom requires sudo to work, but minicom works without - permissions?

2008-04-17 Thread Ruben de Groot
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:11:33AM -0500, Derek Ragona typed: At 07:39 PM 4/14/2008, Steve Franks wrote: I have two terminal programs - cutecom and minicom, both built from ports with no tweaks. Minicom will fire up and hit the serial port just fine, but cutecom can't open it except with

Re: cutecom requires sudo to work, but minicom works without - permissions?

2008-04-15 Thread Derek Ragona
At 07:39 PM 4/14/2008, Steve Franks wrote: I have two terminal programs - cutecom and minicom, both built from ports with no tweaks. Minicom will fire up and hit the serial port just fine, but cutecom can't open it except with sudo. I tried tweaking devfs.conf (as well as a straight chmod on

cutecom requires sudo to work, but minicom works without - permissions?

2008-04-14 Thread Steve Franks
I have two terminal programs - cutecom and minicom, both built from ports with no tweaks. Minicom will fire up and hit the serial port just fine, but cutecom can't open it except with sudo. I tried tweaking devfs.conf (as well as a straight chmod on /dev/cuad0), and it doesn't seem to rectify