Hello,
2008/3/20, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:42:38 +0100
>
> "Zbigniew Szalbot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > > In a some cases it might be smarter to go for "better" drives (made for
> > > operating 24/7).
> > > That being said, I've often used shitty d
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:42:38 +0100
"Zbigniew Szalbot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In a some cases it might be smarter to go for "better" drives (made for
> > operating 24/7).
> > That being said, I've often used shitty drives myself on servers that have
> > been up for ages at a time.
>
> R
> hello,
>
> 2008/3/18, Christian Zachariasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Depending on what you're doing you might clarify what you are
> planning on
> > doing with the disks.
> > Are you running them in any form of RAID?
> >
> > In a some cases it might be smarter to go for "better" drives (made
> f
hello,
2008/3/18, Christian Zachariasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Depending on what you're doing you might clarify what you are planning on
> doing with the disks.
> Are you running them in any form of RAID?
>
> In a some cases it might be smarter to go for "better" drives (made for
> operating 24/7)
Hello,
We will be moving shortly to a dedicated server at a data center and
we have been suggested a machine with the below specifications.
However, the provider uses Fedora exclusively, so they will do an
initial install of FreeBSD but then I am on my own. Tough luck but I
am not going to give up
