On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:14:04 +1000
Colin House articulated:
On 22/08/2013 9:34 AM, Doug Hardie wrote:
There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in
9.2. I believe its also in 9.1. The command:
dig freebsd.org +trace
Only yields a dumb response. No useful
On 21 August 2013, at 18:14, Colin House co...@restecp.com wrote:
On 22/08/2013 9:34 AM, Doug Hardie wrote:
There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. I
believe its also in 9.1. The command:
dig freebsd.org +trace
Only yields a dumb response. No useful
On 22/08/2013 00:34, Doug Hardie wrote:
There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. I believe
its also in 9.1. The command:
dig freebsd.org +trace
Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is provided. Running the
same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields
On 21 August 2013, at 17:02, Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote:
On 21 August 2013, at 16:46, Frank Leonhardt fra...@fjl.co.uk wrote:
On 22/08/2013 00:34, Doug Hardie wrote:
There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. I
believe its also in 9.1. The command
There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in
9.2. I believe its also in 9.1. The command:
dig freebsd.org +trace
Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is
provided. Running the same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a
complete trace with lots
On 22/08/2013 9:34 AM, Doug Hardie wrote:
There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. I believe
its also in 9.1. The command:
dig freebsd.org +trace
Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is provided. Running the
same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields
of telnet. You may also be referring the
format of the DNS query result which known as
[2]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_DNS_lookup
I DID have a connection. ??? Maybe I gave too much detail,
but the point is that the IP yielded by host/dig did not match
what whatismyip.com gave
A previous question to the List on how to get an IP
address from a host speicific URL yielded the helpful
responses of host and dig. These (seemed to) work
fine. Well, just now I got a chance to try it out on a tiny
server I have at someone else's house, and on another
network.
I used telnet
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Walter walte...@earthlink.net wrote:
A previous question to the List on how to get an IP
address from a host speicific URL yielded the helpful
responses of host and dig. These (seemed to) work
fine. Well, just now I got a chance to try it out on a tiny
want to go from this:
x.x.x.x
y.y.y.y
to this;
x.x.x.x foo.domain.tld
y.y..y.y bar.domain.tld
What's the best/easiest way to do this?
Easiest:
$ for i in `cat ip-list`; do
echo -n $i
dig +short -x $i
done
Don't know why I didn't think of that.
I ended
On Aug 18, 2008, at 10:25 PM, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:18:07PM -0500, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
You'll want to change line four to
echo $LINE `dig +short -x $LINE`
for a cleaner output.
The original works fine for me in ash. Definitely nothing wrong
with yours
I know I'm missing the obvious. I want to use an IP list to generate an
ip+hostname list. IOW, I want to go from this:
x.x.x.x
y.y.y.y
to this;
x.x.x.x foo.domain.tld
y.y..y.y bar.domain.tld
What's the best/easiest way to do this?
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior Information
to this;
x.x.x.x foo.domain.tld
y.y..y.y bar.domain.tld
What's the best/easiest way to do this?
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
dig(1) - see section `MULTIPLE QUERIES'
note the -x flag to instruct
way to do this?
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
dig(1) - see section `MULTIPLE QUERIES'
note the -x flag to instruct dig to perform a reverse lookup
see also host(1)
frase
://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
dig(1) - see section `MULTIPLE QUERIES'
note the -x flag to instruct dig to perform a reverse lookup
see also host(1)
That's not a great deal of help. I, of course, had read and re-read the
man pages before posting the question here, and I'm quite familiar
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:18:07PM -0500, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On Aug 18, 2008, at 10:13 PM, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
==
#!/bin/sh
while read LINE
do
echo $LINE `dig +short -x $LINE`
done
===
You'll want
On Aug 18, 2008, at 10:13 PM, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
==
#!/bin/sh
while read LINE
do
echo $LINE `dig +short -x $LINE`
done
===
You'll want to change line four to
echo $LINE `dig +short -x $LINE`
for a cleaner output
this?
Easiest:
$ for i in `cat ip-list`; do
echo -n $i
dig +short -x $i
done
Better might be to use something in p5-net-DNS so that you don't make
N separate calls to dig.
Cheers,
-j
--
Jeffrey Goldberghttp://www.goldmark.org/jeff
/easiest way to do this?
You could pipe it through:
while read ip;do echo ${ip} `dig +short -x ${ip}`;done
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
foo.domain.tld
y.y..y.y bar.domain.tld
What's the best/easiest way to do this?
Easiest:
$ for i in `cat ip-list`; do
echo -n $i
dig +short -x $i
done
Don't know why I didn't think of that.
I ended up using this:
for ip in `cat public_linux_ips`; do echo ${ip} `dig +short -x ${ip}`;
done
Hello.
I have to use socks5 server for outgoing connections
from office LAN. After updating to FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p6
dig stops working via runsocks:
defbsd# runsocks dig
Bus error (core dumped)
in logs:
Aug 26 00:14:51 defbsd libsocks5[7549]: NEC NWSL Socks5 v1.0r11 library
Aug 26 00:14:51
Dear all,
my testbed lacks of Ethernet Ports so one machine has no connection to my DNS,
no problem, there is something called /etc/hosts I thought.
It works if I ping 'hostname', but how can I find out the IP of 'hostname'
from the command line? dig and host want to contact the DNS server
of 'hostname'
from the command line? dig and host want to contact the DNS server, also
nslookup does, so I think I need a utility which uses the gethostbyname(3)
function. Is there one? Unfortunately I can't write one myself, at least not
in a reasonable amount of time
May I ask what you're
.
It works if I ping 'hostname', but how can I find out the IP of
'hostname' from the command line? dig and host want to contact the DNS
server, also nslookup does, so I think I need a utility which uses the
gethostbyname(3) function. Is there one? Unfortunately I can't write one
myself
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2005-03-28, Emanuel Strobl scribbled these
curious markings:
Is there one? Unfortunately I can't write one myself, at least not
in a reasonable amount of time
- --cut--
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
use Socket;
my $host = shift or die
it was said:
It works if I ping 'hostname', but how can I find out the IP of
'hostname' from the command line?
Hello,
Would not grep 'hostname' /etc/hosts do this?
HTH,
stheg
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources
Hi all. Wondering if anyone else is having similar problems. On
5.3-RELEASE (smp if it matters), I'm getting occasional (1 out of
every 10 runs or so) seg faults from running dig. In the core dump,
it makes mention of:
pointer != NULL
ERROR
/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: dig/named - res_nsend: Protocol not supported
Luke Cowell disturbed my sleep to write:
*Why* do I need to have IPV6 enable ? Is it some configuration option
of named that I overlooked ?
Hm...it could be that named is only listening on IPv6 localhost (::1)
rather than IPv4
Ignore my previously stated question. What I meant to say was:
*Why* do I need to have IPV6 enable ? Is it some configuration option
of named that I overlooked ?
On Feb 6, 2004, at 9:23, Luke Cowell wrote:
Hi I'm running FreeBSD 4.9 and I'm having a little difficulty with
named/dig.
%uname
Hi I'm running FreeBSD 4.9 and I'm having a little difficulty with
named/dig.
%uname -a
FreeBSD polo.asap.bc.ca 4.9-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p1 #1: Thu
Feb 5 16:23:04 PST 2004
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/POLO i386
Here's what's happening.
%dig @localhost
; DiG 8.3
Luke Cowell disturbed my sleep to write:
*Why* do I need to have IPV6 enable ? Is it some configuration option
of named that I overlooked ?
Hm...it could be that named is only listening on IPv6 localhost (::1)
rather than IPv4 (127.0.0.1) by default, but that seems strange to me.
Try grep
Hi I'm running FreeBSD 4.9 and I'm having a little difficulty with
named/dig.
%uname -a
FreeBSD polo.asap.bc.ca 4.9-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p1 #1: Thu
Feb 5 16:23:04 PST 2004
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/POLO i386
Here's what's happening.
%dig @localhost
; DiG 8.3
How do I check my ISP domain name to see if it's DNS server is
configured
correctly for email reverse DNS lookup? I have used dig
isp-domain-name
but I can not tell from what it displays what to look for to verify
it's configured
correctly. The dig display is lacking descriptive verbiage
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, JoeB wrote:
How do I check my ISP domain name to see if it's DNS server is
configured correctly for email reverse DNS lookup? I have used dig
isp-domain-name but I can not tell from what it displays what to
look
for to verify it's configured correctly. The dig display
Hello,
I don't know if this is related to post earlier today [FBSD 4.7
reset itself - lots of DENY UDP messages in /var/log/security], but
I've been trying to trouble shoot the DENY messages in
/var/log/security using dig:
# dig . ns b.root-servers.net
; DiG 8.3 . ns b.root-servers.net
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 03:24:07PM +, Stacey Roberts typed:
Hello,
I don't know if this is related to post earlier today [FBSD 4.7
reset itself - lots of DENY UDP messages in /var/log/security], but
I've been trying to trouble shoot the DENY messages in
/var/log/security using dig
/log/security], but
I've been trying to trouble shoot the DENY messages in
/var/log/security using dig:
# dig . ns @b.root-servers.net
; DiG 8.3 . ns @b.root-servers.net
; (1 server found)
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; res_nsend to server b.root-servers.net
Just checked against http://www.pgp.net/wwwkeys.html to verify:
pub 2048R/DC92FBD7 2002-08-03 Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key fingerprint = 04 2E 82 F6 3E 78 25 14 42 84 90 E7 B7 B1 F7 26
Verbose:
Public Key Server -- Verbose Index ``0xDC92FBD7 ''
Type bits/keyIDDate User
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 05:18:10PM +, Stacey Roberts wrote:
Just checked against http://www.pgp.net/wwwkeys.html to verify:
pub 2048R/DC92FBD7 2002-08-03 Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key fingerprint = 04 2E 82 F6 3E 78 25 14 42 84 90 E7 B7 B1 F7 26
Verbose:
Public Key
18:19:35 GMT 2002
# dig . ns @b.root-servers.net
; DiG 8.3 . ns @b.root-servers.net
; (1 server found)
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; res_nsend to server b.root-servers.net 128.9.0.107: Operation timed
out
Checking logs:
# tail /var/log/security
snip
Oct 27 18:19:40 Demon /kernel
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 06:29:16PM +, Stacey Roberts wrote:
Subject: Re: dig . ns @b.root-servers.net - Connection refused. WHY?
[related to FBSD 4.7 reset itself - lots of DENY UDP mess]ages in
/var/log/security
From: Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ruben de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc
Hi,
I've made the changes to rule 00618 as you've suggested, but now I get
a different error:
# dig .ns @a.root-servers.net
; DiG 8.3 .ns @a.root-servers.net
; (1 server found)
;; res_nmkquery: buffer too small
# dig .ns @b.root-servers.net
; DiG 8.3 .ns @b.root-servers.net
; (1 server
Hello,
Thought you'd like to know that the amendments you suggested works
for me now.
Thank you very much for the time and effort! See:
$ dig . ns @c.root-servers.net
; DiG 8.3 . ns @c.root-servers.net
; (1 server found)
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer
43 matches
Mail list logo
