Kj?re kunde,
--
--
Vi har oppdaget uregelmessig aktivitet av deres kredittkort.
For din beskyttelse, m? vi sjekke denne prosessen
og kredittkort midlertidig begrense. Vennligst last ned
Dokumentet i Vedlegg E,
hi there,
the du(1) man page states the following:
-B blocksize
Calculate block counts in blocksize byte blocks. This is differ-
ent from the -k, -m options or setting BLOCKSIZE and gives an
estimate of how much space the examined file hierarchy
On Oct 19, 2011, at 12:34 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
the du(1) man page states the following:
-B blocksize
Calculate block counts in blocksize byte blocks. This is differ-
ent from the -k, -m options or setting BLOCKSIZE and gives an
estimate of how
On Wed Oct 19 11, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Oct 19, 2011, at 12:34 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
the du(1) man page states the following:
-B blocksize
Calculate block counts in blocksize byte blocks. This is
differ-
ent from the -k, -m options or setting
On Wed Oct 19 11, Alexander Best wrote:
On Wed Oct 19 11, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Oct 19, 2011, at 12:34 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
the du(1) man page states the following:
-B blocksize
Calculate block counts in blocksize byte blocks. This is
differ
On Oct 19, 2011, at 1:37 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
The default blocksize is 512 bytes.
The -B option flag lets you tell du to assume a different filesystem
blocksize.
so when running freebsd on a hdd with a blocksize of 4k, a simple 'du -h' will
always display incorrect results, unless
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:47:54 +
From: Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: small du(1) question
the blocksize of the underlying filesystem, shouldn't the output of
'du -A -B4096' and 'du -A' be the same? just tested this on freebsd 7 and
freebsd 10 and the outputs differ
Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com writes:
On Oct 19, 2011, at 1:37 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
The default blocksize is 512 bytes.
The -B option flag lets you tell du to assume a different filesystem
blocksize.
so when running freebsd on a hdd with a blocksize of 4k, a simple 'du -h
Hello list,
I having a problem to understand the output of du and df command :
[root@ftp ~]# df -h /opt/
FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/xbd6 387G342G 13G96%/opt
[root@ftp ~]# du -sh /opt/
342G/opt/
But 387Go - 342Go not equal to 13Go
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:58:12 +0200, Alain AUDEBERT aka 2A wrote:
Hello list,
I having a problem to understand the output of du and df command :
[root@ftp ~]# df -h /opt/
FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/xbd6 387G342G 13G96%/opt
[root@ftp
Le 13 août 2011 à 00:35, Polytropon a écrit :
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:58:12 +0200, Alain AUDEBERT aka 2A wrote:
Hello list,
I having a problem to understand the output of du and df command :
[root@ftp ~]# df -h /opt/
FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/xbd6
On 08/12/2011 06:58 PM, Alain AUDEBERT aka 2A wrote:
Hello list,
I having a problem to understand the output of du and df command :
[root@ftp ~]# df -h /opt/
FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/xbd6 387G342G 13G96%/opt
[root@ftp ~]# du -sh /opt
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Alain AUDEBERT aka 2A de...@me.com wrote:
Is it the 8% reserved by FFS ?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/faq/disks.html#MANUFACTURER-DISK-SIZE
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I have try a tunefs -m 1 /dev/xbd6, unmount, mount and nothing change
Is it the 8% reserved by FFS ?
Yes
read http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/faq/disks.html
Question 9.27 (last one)
Hi Rodrigo,
Ok, so I understand why the free space is not equal to : available - used
But in this
I have try a tunefs -m 1 /dev/xbd6, unmount, mount and nothing change
Is it the 8% reserved by FFS ?
Yes
Maybe it's important, but it's not an hard disk, just a Xen volume !
So maybe we can't tunefs it ?
Regards,
Alain
--
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GIT/MU/S/SS
On 08/12/2011 08:14 PM, Alain AUDEBERT aka 2A wrote:
I have try a tunefs -m 1 /dev/xbd6, unmount, mount and nothing change
Is it the 8% reserved by FFS ?
Yes
Maybe it's important, but it's not an hard disk, just a Xen volume !
So maybe we can't tunefs it ?
Unfortunately I cannot answer that
...@gmail.com wrote:
du -h . | awk '{a[i++]=$0} END {for (j=i-1; j=0;) print a[j--] }' |
awk '{print($2 [$1]);}' | sed -e 's,[^-][^/]*/,--,g' -e 's,^,|,'
I confess to being impressed...
Yeah, but perhaps I should have used sed instead of the second awk;
fewer
On Apr 6, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
Again, why don't you guys just use perl to provide a graphical du? I believe
perl is just present on every freebsd machine where graphical du is needed.
Although it is a common addition, Perl isn't part of the FreeBSD base system.
Regards
2011/4/6 Peter Vereshagin pe...@vereshagin.org:
Again, why don't you guys just use perl to provide a graphical du? I believe
perl is just present on every freebsd machine where graphical du is needed.
Why on Earth would you use Perl when a simple awk script will do???
Chris
Nobody knows that you're in for that, freebsd-questions!
2011/04/06 20:34:42 +0100 Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com = To Peter Vereshagin
:
CR Again, why don't you guys just use perl to provide a graphical du? I
believe
CR perl is just present on every freebsd machine where graphical du
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 08:34:42PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
2011/4/6 Peter Vereshagin pe...@vereshagin.org:
Again, why don't you guys just use perl to provide a graphical du? I believe
perl is just present on every freebsd machine where graphical du is needed.
Why on Earth would you
...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 April 2011 18:07, Mike Jeaysmike.je...@rogers.com wrote:
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 17:15:04 +0100
Chris Reesutis...@gmail.com wrote:
du -h . | awk '{a[i++]=$0} END {for (j=i-1; j=0;) print a[j--] }' |
awk '{print($2 [$1]);}' | sed -e 's,[^-][^/]*/,--,g' -e 's
On 02/04/2011 19:30, Chris Rees wrote:
On 2 April 2011 18:22, Chris Reesutis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 April 2011 18:07, Mike Jeaysmike.je...@rogers.com wrote:
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 17:15:04 +0100
Chris Reesutis...@gmail.com wrote:
du -h . | awk '{a[i++]=$0} END {for (j=i-1; j=0;) print a[j
Reesutis...@gmail.com wrote:
du -h . | awk '{a[i++]=$0} END {for (j=i-1; j=0;) print a[j--] }' |
awk '{print($2 [$1]);}' | sed -e 's,[^-][^/]*/,--,g' -e 's,^,|,'
I confess to being impressed...
Yeah, but perhaps I should have used sed instead of the second awk;
fewer processes
...@rogers.com wrote:
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 17:15:04 +0100
Chris Reesutis...@gmail.com wrote:
du -h . | awk '{a[i++]=$0} END {for (j=i-1; j=0;) print a[j--] }' |
awk '{print($2 [$1]);}' | sed -e 's,[^-][^/]*/,--,g' -e 's,^,|,'
I confess to being impressed...
Yeah, but perhaps I should have
I found this command:
ls -R | grep :$ | sed -e 's/:$//' -e 's/[^-][^\/]*\//--/g' -e 's/^/ /' -e
's/-/|/'
Which makes this:
|-Mar17
|---1300074369-chow
|-download
|---small
|---1300421616-Cunningham
|-download
|---small
But I want to use `du` instead
|-download
|---small
But I want to use `du` instead to convert this
2.0M ./Mar17/1300074369-chow/download/small
2.0M ./Mar17/1300074369-chow/download
2.0M ./Mar17/1300074369-chow
2.1M ./Mar17/1300421616-Cunningham/download/small
2.1M ./Mar17/1300421616-Cunningham
On 2 April 2011 18:07, Mike Jeays mike.je...@rogers.com wrote:
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 17:15:04 +0100
Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
du -h . | awk '{a[i++]=$0} END {for (j=i-1; j=0;) print a[j--] }' |
awk '{print($2 [$1]);}' | sed -e 's,[^-][^/]*/,--,g' -e 's,^,|,'
I confess to being
On 2 April 2011 18:22, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 April 2011 18:07, Mike Jeays mike.je...@rogers.com wrote:
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 17:15:04 +0100
Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
du -h . | awk '{a[i++]=$0} END {for (j=i-1; j=0;) print a[j--] }' |
awk '{print($2 [$1]);}' | sed -e
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 17:15:04 +0100
Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
du -h . | awk '{a[i++]=$0} END {for (j=i-1; j=0;) print a[j--] }' |
awk '{print($2 [$1]);}' | sed -e 's,[^-][^/]*/,--,g' -e 's,^,|,'
I confess to being impressed...
___
freebsd
Wow... You rock!
Thanks so much!
On Apr 2, 2011, at 12:30 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
On 2 April 2011 18:22, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 April 2011 18:07, Mike Jeays mike.je...@rogers.com wrote:
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 17:15:04 +0100
Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
du -h . | awk
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 06:30:15PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
On 2 April 2011 18:22, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 April 2011 18:07, Mike Jeays mike.je...@rogers.com wrote:
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 17:15:04 +0100
Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
du -h . | awk '{a[i++]=$0} END
Hi
On 2 April 2011 15:20, Ryan Coleman edi...@d3photography.com wrote:
I found this command:
ls -R | grep :$ | sed -e 's/:$//' -e 's/[^-][^\/]*\//--/g' -e 's/^/ /' -e
's/-/|/'
What about xdu?
http://sd.wareonearth.com/~phil/xdu/
David
___
Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I should port it...
+1
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Well, it looks like it's written for X, which I don't run on any of my servers.
Thanks, though.
On Apr 2, 2011, at 6:50 PM, David Chanters wrote:
Hi
On 2 April 2011 15:20, Ryan Coleman edi...@d3photography.com wrote:
I found this command:
ls -R | grep :$ | sed -e 's/:$//' -e
On 3 April 2011 01:30, Ryan Coleman edi...@d3photography.com wrote:
Well, it looks like it's written for X, which I don't run on any of my
servers.
Moan, moan, moan. It solves your problem though.
David
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Yeah I don't run these computers to be desktops :)
On Apr 2, 2011, at 8:05 PM, David Chanters wrote:
On 3 April 2011 01:30, Ryan Coleman edi...@d3photography.com wrote:
Well, it looks like it's written for X, which I don't run on any of my
servers.
Moan, moan, moan. It solves your
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 08:07:43PM -0500, Ryan Coleman wrote:
Yeah I don't run these computers to be desktops :)
exactly. i Do have x11 and ctwm just to get two xterms. but
prefer the console. --besides, xdu takes too long.
On Apr 2, 2011, at 8:05 PM, David Chanters
On 3 April 2011 02:25, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 08:07:43PM -0500, Ryan Coleman wrote:
Yeah I don't run these computers to be desktops :)
exactly. i Do have x11 and ctwm just to get two xterms. but
prefer the console. --besides, xdu takes
2011/1/6 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk:
On 06/01/2011 11:26, c0re wrote:
# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a 496M 466M -9.8M 102% /
So it's full.
But by du it's not appeared to be full
# du -hxd 1 /
2.0K /.snap
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon Feb 28 05:31:46 2011
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:24:30 +0300
From: c0re nr1c...@gmail.com
To: Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
Cc: FreeBSD freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: / file system is full, but du does not show
@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: / file system is full, but du does not show that it's full
2011/1/6 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk:
On 06/01/2011 11:26, c0re wrote:
# df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a496M466M -9.8M 102
On 2/28/11 12:24 PM, c0re wrote:
2011/1/6 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk:
On 06/01/2011 11:26, c0re wrote:
# df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a496M466M -9.8M 102%/
So it's full.
But by du it's not appeared
On 28 February 2011 12:26, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
# mount /dev/da0s1a /mnt/root/
mount: /dev/da0s1a : Operation not permitted
So only single user mode or live cd could solve it.
*NOT* true. Stopping any daemons that were using /var/spooll, and then
umount(1)-ing it would
On 2/28/11 1:27 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
On 28 February 2011 12:26, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
# mount /dev/da0s1a /mnt/root/
mount: /dev/da0s1a : Operation not permitted
So only single user mode or live cd could solve it.
*NOT* true. Stopping any daemons that were using
On 28 February 2011 12:29, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
On 2/28/11 1:27 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
On 28 February 2011 12:26, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
# mount /dev/da0s1a /mnt/root/
mount: /dev/da0s1a : Operation not permitted
So only single user mode or live cd could solve it.
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:29:59 +0100, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
Slice a (as in: da0s1a) is very likely his /
/var is usually slice f
Terminology: Slices are with numbers, partitions are with letters. :-)
E. g. da0s1 is the FreeBSD slice, its partition a = da0s1a is /,
while /var
On 02/28/11 12:47, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:29:59 +0100, Damien Fleuriotm...@my.gd wrote:
Slice a (as in: da0s1a) is very likely his /
/var is usually slice f
Terminology: Slices are with numbers, partitions are with letters. :-)
E. g. da0s1 is the FreeBSD slice, its
: / file system is full, but du does not show that it's full
2011/1/6 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk:
On 06/01/2011 11:26, c0re wrote:
# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a 496M 466M -9.8M 102% /
So it's full
# df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a496M466M -9.8M 102%/
So it's full.
But by du it's not appeared to be full
# du -hxd 1 /
2.0K/.snap
512B/dev
2.0K/tmp
2.0K/usr
2.0K/var
1.9M/etc
2.0K/cdrom
2.0K/dist
1.0M
What about filehandlers?
On Jan 6, 2011, at 5:26 AM, c0re wrote:
# df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a496M466M -9.8M 102%/
So it's full.
But by du it's not appeared to be full
# du -hxd 1 /
2.0K/.snap
512B/dev
2.0K
On 06/01/2011 11:26, c0re wrote:
# df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a496M466M -9.8M 102%/
So it's full.
But by du it's not appeared to be full
# du -hxd 1 /
2.0K/.snap
512B/dev
2.0K/tmp
2.0K/usr
2.0K/var
2011/1/6 Ryan Coleman ryan.cole...@cwis.biz:
What about filehandlers?
On Jan 6, 2011, at 5:26 AM, c0re wrote:
# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a 496M 466M -9.8M 102% /
So it's full.
But by du it's not appeared to be full
# du
2011/1/6 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk:
On 06/01/2011 11:26, c0re wrote:
# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a 496M 466M -9.8M 102% /
So it's full.
But by du it's not appeared to be full
# du -hxd 1 /
2.0K /.snap
Concrete jungle, oh freebsd-questions, you've got to do your best...
2011/01/06 15:06:18 +0300 c0re nr1c...@gmail.com = To FreeBSD :
cr # lsof /
why not to restart your httpd and mysqld?
This may release your unused filehandles.
Another place to look for wasted space is filesystem snapshots, if
Concrete jungle, oh freebsd-questions, you've got to do your best...
2011/01/06 16:57:34 +0300 Peter Vereshagin pe...@vereshagin.org = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
PV This may release your unused filehandles.
used but unlinked, really, oops.
73! Peter pgp: A0E26627 (4A42 6841 2871 5EA7
Server has been rebooted before to try this.
Chris
Sorry for top-posting, Android won't let me quote, but K-9 can't yet do
threading.
On 6 Jan 2011 14:06, Peter Vereshagin pe...@vereshagin.org wrote:
Concrete jungle, oh freebsd-questions, you've got to do your best...
2011/01/06
why not to restart your httpd and mysqld?
This may release your unused filehandles.
As I said I've restarted whole server, so nothing there to release at all.
Another place to look for wasted space is filesystem snapshots, if any. They
can be created implicitly, e. g., by fsck.
Yeah, I
implicitly, e. g., by fsck.
Yeah, I checked /.snap - nothing there.
Reboot into single user mode, and check with du -hs /* before the system
mounts other FS'es than /
//Svein
--
+---+---
/\ |Svein Skogen | sv...@d80.iso100
Concrete jungle, oh freebsd-questions, you've got to do your best...
2011/01/06 17:19:05 +0300 c0re nr1c...@gmail.com = To FreeBSD :
cr Another place to look for wasted space is filesystem snapshots, if any.
They
cr can be created implicitly, e. g., by fsck.
cr Yeah, I checked /.snap - nothing
, but even though du
shows some 700 Mb of usage, df shows that the disk is full (-1.5 Gb):
[fer...@omega ~] sudo du -hc -d1 /var/
Password:
2.0K/var/.snap
423M/var/account
6.0K/var/at
2.0K/var/audit
18K/var/backups
4.0K/var/crash
6.0K/var/cron
53M/var/db
2.0K/var
You have a file locking problem. du shows disk in use, but df shows disk
committed. Use lsof to identify the file that has disk space reserved but
no longer exists. man (8) lsof
--On February 12, 2010 5:39:44 PM -0300 Fernan Aguero
fernan.agu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a box (7.2
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote:
You have a file locking problem. du shows disk in use, but df shows disk
committed. Use lsof to identify the file that has disk space reserved but
no longer exists. man (8) lsof
Thanks Paul for the suggestion
My /var partition is showing a different value for a df -k on the file
system vs a du -s on the file system:
df -k
Filesystem1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a 202603088954497440448%/
devfs 1 1 0 100%/dev
On Thursday 13 August 2009 12:37:00 Don O'Neil wrote:
My /var partition is showing a different value for a df -k on the file
system vs a du -s on the file system:
FAQ. Search = good(tm).
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#DU-VS-DF
--
Mel
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 01:37:00PM -0700, Don O'Neil wrote:
My /var partition is showing a different value for a df -k on the file
system vs a du -s on the file system:
df -k
Filesystem1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a 202603088954497440448
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 20:12:56 +
RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 20:13:17 +0100
Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net wrote:
Hello.
I use FreeBSD 6.3. I set quota to my fs.
But, when I print disk usage with du -sh, I have:
..
Why this difference
Hello.
I use FreeBSD 6.3. I set quota to my fs.
But, when I print disk usage with du -sh, I have:
r...@domain sites $ du -sh folder
633Mfolder
But, when I print disk usage with quota -u user, I have:
isk quotas for user user (uid 2002):
Filesystem usage quota limit grace
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net wrote:
Hello.
I use FreeBSD 6.3. I set quota to my fs.
But, when I print disk usage with du -sh, I have:
r...@domain sites $ du -sh folder
633Mfolder
But, when I print disk usage with quota -u user, I have:
isk
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net
wrote:
Hello.
I use FreeBSD 6.3. I set quota to my fs.
But, when I print disk usage with du -sh, I have:
r...@domain sites $ du -sh folder
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 20:13:17 +0100
Nicolas Letellier nico...@nicoelro.net wrote:
Hello.
I use FreeBSD 6.3. I set quota to my fs.
But, when I print disk usage with du -sh, I have:
..
Why this difference? (633M against 648264)
Try dividing 648264 by 1024
After nearly running out of space on my /var partition recently, I went
in to clean things up and ensure that it didn't happen again. Using the
du command to look for offending directories and files, I wiped out a
bunch of old Apache and Qmail logs...and then found that I was still
using 90
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 02:28:43PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After nearly running out of space on my /var partition recently, I went in
to clean things up and ensure that it didn't happen again. Using the du
command to look for offending directories and files, I wiped out a bunch
In response to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
After nearly running out of space on my /var partition recently, I went
in to clean things up and ensure that it didn't happen again. Using the
du command to look for offending directories and files, I wiped out a
bunch of old Apache and Qmail logs
After nearly running out of space on my /var partition recently, I went
in to clean things up and ensure that it didn't happen again. Using the
du command to look for offending directories and files, I wiped out a
bunch of old Apache and Qmail logs...and then found that I was still
using 90
These wildly different results have me confused. How in the world can there
be a ~1.2GB difference between the disk space in use as reported by these two
tools? Which is right? More importantly, how do I fix this?
1) there is 1.2GB files open but deleted
2) there are snapshots
i don't know
clean things up and ensure that it didn't happen again. Using the du
command to look for offending directories and files, I wiped out a bunch of
old Apache and Qmail logs...and then found that I was still using 90% of the
you forgot to restart apache and qmail.
and they keep these logs open
Hi all
I search some technics/command/anything can make very fast «du» especialy
when in the file system there are lot of lot of hard-link.
Regards.
--
Albert SHIH
Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT)
U.F.R. de Mathematiques.
7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10
Heure local/Local time:
Wed May
On May 17, 2006, at 5:35 PM, Albert Shih wrote:
I search some technics/command/anything can make very fast «du»
especialy
when in the file system there are lot of lot of hard-link.
Set up a swap-based RAM disk and run your du commands against files
on that...?
Otherwise, if you have
Le 17/05/2006 à 18:17:54-0400, Charles Swiger a écrit
On May 17, 2006, at 5:35 PM, Albert Shih wrote:
I search some technics/command/anything can make very fast «du»
especialy
when in the file system there are lot of lot of hard-link.
Set up a swap-based RAM disk and run your du commands
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 01:37:47AM +0200, Albert Shih wrote:
Le 17/05/2006 ? 18:17:54-0400, Charles Swiger a ?crit
On May 17, 2006, at 5:35 PM, Albert Shih wrote:
I search some technics/command/anything can make very fast ?du?
especialy
when in the file system there are lot of lot
chkn# du -h
12K.
chkn#
Anyone know what that is? This is a brand new FreeBSD 5.4 install.
Thanks
--
Robert G.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
At 08:43 PM 8/30/2005, Robert G. wrote:
chkn# du -h
12K.
chkn#
Anyone know what that is? This is a brand new FreeBSD 5.4 install.
A bit of a guess, but it looks like you're running du in a dir that
has no subdirs.
-Glenn
Thanks
--
Robert G
In the last episode (Aug 30), Robert G. said:
chkn# du -h
12K.
chkn#
Anyone know what that is? This is a brand new FreeBSD 5.4 install.
Did you mean to run df maybe?
--
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions
Hilco Wijbenga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/14/2005 12:01 AM
To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
cc
Subject
Soft-updates du df
Hi,
I've taken over the administration of a FreeBSD box and now I've run
into a problem that I could not solve by means of Google
248M246M-18M 108%/var
even though
[EMAIL PROTECTED] du -hs /var
43M/var
Shouldn't du and df roughly agree on the amount that's used/available?
/var is mounted using soft-updates
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mount
/dev/ad2s1a on / (ufs, local)
devfs on /dev (devfs, local, multilabel
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 02:01:27PM -0700, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
Shouldn't du and df roughly agree on the amount that's used/available?
Please consult the FAQ.
Kris
pgpAeaIlyXp8L.pgp
Description: PGP signature
SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad2s1d248M246M-18M 108%/var
even though
[EMAIL PROTECTED] du -hs /var
43M/var
Shouldn't du and df roughly agree on the amount that's used/available?
You probably have some deleted logfiles that are still held open
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 16:12 -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
You probably have some deleted logfiles that are still held open by
processes. Run lsof +L1 -a /var to list the files and the processes
(you may need to install lsof from ports). Kill and restart the
offending processes and your freespace
Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad2s1d248M246M-18M 108%/var
even though
[EMAIL PROTECTED] du -hs /var
43M/var
The discrepancy between du and df usually happens when a log file is
deleted out from under syslogd. (or something similar) When that is done,
syslogd
Hello, all!
(sorry for not wraping text, it messes up)
what do I miss here?
sum of individual file sizes is much more than total in ls and more than du -k
reports
bash-2.05b$ ls -l
total 354112
-rw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 98490960 1 12:29 88479E51B1D77190A2A8C882
-rw-r--r-- 1 lesha
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 01:04:32AM +0400, Alex K wrote:
what do I miss here?
sum of individual file sizes is much more than total in ls and more than du -k
reports
bash-2.05b$ ls -l
total 354112
-rw-r--r-- 1 lesha wheel 98490960 1 ??? 12:29 88479E51B1D77190A2A8C882
-rw-r--r-- 1
, they rm entire directory trees to free the
space. They use du to determine how much space is in a directory and
how much they are hogging.
The problem I'm having is, after they do the rm's, it doesn't free the
disk space. df shows it still being used, but du claims their
directories are empty
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 05:04, Eric Anderson wrote:
The problem I'm having is, after they do the rm's, it doesn't free the
disk space. df shows it still being used, but du claims their
directories are empty.
Please see
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#DU-VS
Nelis Lamprecht wrote:
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 05:04, Eric Anderson wrote:
The problem I'm having is, after they do the rm's, it doesn't free the
disk space. df shows it still being used, but du claims their
directories are empty.
Please see
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1
Nelis Lamprecht wrote:
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 05:04, Eric Anderson wrote:
The problem I'm having is, after they do the rm's, it doesn't free the
disk space. df shows it still being used, but du claims their
directories are empty.
Please see
http://www.freebsd.org
Jerry McAllister wrote:
Nelis Lamprecht wrote:
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 05:04, Eric Anderson wrote:
The problem I'm having is, after they do the rm's, it doesn't free the
disk space. df shows it still being used, but du claims their
directories are empty.
Please see
fill up the partitions often
enough, and when they do, they rm entire directory trees to free
the space. They use du to determine how much space is in a
directory and how much they are hogging.
The problem I'm having is, after they do the rm's, it doesn't free
the disk space. df shows it still
Jerry McAllister wrote:
Nelis Lamprecht wrote:
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 05:04, Eric Anderson wrote:
The problem I'm having is, after they do the rm's, it doesn't free the
disk space. df shows it still being used, but du claims their
directories are empty.
Please see
http
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 04:50:24AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
:
: On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 04:54:10AM -0500, Eugene Lee wrote:
:
: FreeBSD 4.9p7. I have a new Dell PowerEdge 1750 that is giving me fits.
: I have a ~/src directory containing source tarballs that are unpacked.
: A du -s ~/src
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
