Just because it is a more generalized way of doing it and it
is so easy, and takes no extra space, so why not!
because it adds an unneeded mess. at least for me.
and reduces chance that windows will make any mess when (probably by
accident) windows will be booted with this drive connected.
_
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 07:34:56PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >to it./usr/local and /usr/src are often good candidates.
> >
> >To do that, create the partition using fdisk (for the slice), then
>
> if it's freebsd-only drive, why using fdisk at all?
Just because it is a more generali
to it./usr/local and /usr/src are often good candidates.
To do that, create the partition using fdisk (for the slice), then
if it's freebsd-only drive, why using fdisk at all?
i live very well without it on ALL machines i installed.
you simply get (for example)
/dev/ad0a instead of ad
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 12:12:49PM +0200, Deian Popov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to expand /usr of FreeBSD 6.2. I plan to get a new HDD, format
> it and create slices. But how to proceed after that? Do I just mount it over
> the existing /usr or is there any additional steps that must be pe
I would like to expand /usr of FreeBSD 6.2. I plan to get a new HDD, format
it and create slices. But how to proceed after that? Do I just mount it over
the existing /usr or is there any additional steps that must be performed?
it's quite difficult to understand you (at least for me).
what do y
Hello,
I would like to expand /usr of FreeBSD 6.2. I plan to get a new HDD, format
it and create slices. But how to proceed after that? Do I just mount it over
the existing /usr or is there any additional steps that must be performed?
___
freebsd-questio