Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2011-08-14 Thread Alexander Best
On Sun Aug 14 11, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> 2011/8/14 Alexander Best :
> > On Sun Aug 14 11, Niclas Zeising wrote:
> >> On 2011-08-13 12:08, Roland Smith wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> >> >> On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote:
> >> >>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> >> >>>> On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote:
> >> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
> >> >>> Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are the
> >> >>> permissions et cetera OK?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Roland
> >> >>
> >> >> No, it does not.
> >> >>
> >> >> What I did so far over night:
> >> >>
> >> >> I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again.
> >> >> Again failure.
> >> >> After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports).
> >> >> Everything seems
> >> >> all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a
> >> >> non-portsnap-created /usr/ports
> >> >> and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very
> >> >> same failure:
> >> >>
> >> >> (portsnap fetch extract:)
> >> >> /usr/ports/devel//
> >> >> /usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/
> >> >> /usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/
> >> >> /usr/ports/devel/cdash/
> >> >> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
> >> >>  not
> >> >> found -- snapshot corrupt.
> >> >
> >> > I've been looking at the portsnap shellscript. This error message is 
> >> > generated
> >> > by the shell's built-in test command, specifically '[ -r'. It is looking 
> >> > for a
> >> > file that was extracted with tar. So the place to look for the bug is IMO
> >> >
> >> > 1) the portsnap script itself (differences between 8.2 and 9?)
> >> > 2) the sh(1)'s built-in test command (ditto)
> >> > 3) tar (ditto)
> >> >
> >> > When you run 'portsnap fetch' it downloads a tgz archive and unpacks it 
> >> > with
> >> > tar(1). What you could try is to comment out the line 'rm 
> >> > ${SNAPSHOTHASH}.tgz'
> >> > in portsnap, and test if the tgz file extracts differently using an
> >> > 8.2-RELEASE tar and the 9-CURRENT tar.  If so, that would be a bug!
> >> >
> >> > Roland
> >>
> >> Just a "me too!". It happens for me on a recently updated 9-current
> >> virtual machine, built with clang.
> >
> > same here:
> >
> > /usr/ports/databases/gigabase/
> > /usr/ports/databases/godis/
> > files/39644d98f9e9b9d9a362cbfc075a996683e8a611a4362d883247c9a2e2fa2658.gz 
> > not found -- snapshot corrupt.
> >
> > running r224841 on amd64 built with base clang.
> 
> Aparently fixed with latest HEAD *kernel* :
> 
> # svn log -v -r224842
> 
> r224842 | rwatson | 2011-08-13 18:03:40 +0200 (sam 13 aoû 2011) | 10 lignes
> Chemins modifiés :
>M /head/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c
> 
> When falloc() was broken into separate falloc_noinstall() and finstall(),
> a bug was introduced in kern_openat() such that the error from the vnode
> open operation was overwritten before it was passed as an argument to
> dupfdopen().  This broke operations on /dev/{stdin,stdout,stderr}.  Fix
> by preserving the original error number across finstall() so that it is
> still available.
> 
> Approved by:re (kib)
> Reported by:cognet
> 
> 
> 
> You won't be able to buildworld with the buggy kernel, but you can
> buildkernel and reboot on the new kernel. No problems with portsnap
> after that (don't know if you have to clean the old portsnap files, I
> did it).

thanks. switching to a newer revision alone didn't solve the issue. however
after doing

rm -r /var/db/portsnap/files/; rm /var/db/portsnap/t*; portsnap fetch update

everything's back to normal. :)

> 
> -- 
> Olivier Smedts                                                 _
>                                         ASCII ribbon campaign ( )
> e-mail: oliv...@gid0.org        - against HTML email & vCards  X
> www: http://www.gid0.org    - against proprietary attachments / \
> 
>   "Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde :
>   ceux qui comprennent le binaire,
>   et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas."
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2011-08-14 Thread Olivier Smedts
2011/8/14 Alexander Best :
> On Sun Aug 14 11, Niclas Zeising wrote:
>> On 2011-08-13 12:08, Roland Smith wrote:
>> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> >> On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote:
>> >>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> >>>> On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote:
>> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
>> >>> Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are the
>> >>> permissions et cetera OK?
>> >>>
>> >>> Roland
>> >>
>> >> No, it does not.
>> >>
>> >> What I did so far over night:
>> >>
>> >> I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again.
>> >> Again failure.
>> >> After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports).
>> >> Everything seems
>> >> all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a
>> >> non-portsnap-created /usr/ports
>> >> and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very
>> >> same failure:
>> >>
>> >> (portsnap fetch extract:)
>> >> /usr/ports/devel//
>> >> /usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/
>> >> /usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/
>> >> /usr/ports/devel/cdash/
>> >> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz 
>> >> not
>> >> found -- snapshot corrupt.
>> >
>> > I've been looking at the portsnap shellscript. This error message is 
>> > generated
>> > by the shell's built-in test command, specifically '[ -r'. It is looking 
>> > for a
>> > file that was extracted with tar. So the place to look for the bug is IMO
>> >
>> > 1) the portsnap script itself (differences between 8.2 and 9?)
>> > 2) the sh(1)'s built-in test command (ditto)
>> > 3) tar (ditto)
>> >
>> > When you run 'portsnap fetch' it downloads a tgz archive and unpacks it 
>> > with
>> > tar(1). What you could try is to comment out the line 'rm 
>> > ${SNAPSHOTHASH}.tgz'
>> > in portsnap, and test if the tgz file extracts differently using an
>> > 8.2-RELEASE tar and the 9-CURRENT tar.  If so, that would be a bug!
>> >
>> > Roland
>>
>> Just a "me too!". It happens for me on a recently updated 9-current
>> virtual machine, built with clang.
>
> same here:
>
> /usr/ports/databases/gigabase/
> /usr/ports/databases/godis/
> files/39644d98f9e9b9d9a362cbfc075a996683e8a611a4362d883247c9a2e2fa2658.gz not 
> found -- snapshot corrupt.
>
> running r224841 on amd64 built with base clang.

Aparently fixed with latest HEAD *kernel* :

# svn log -v -r224842

r224842 | rwatson | 2011-08-13 18:03:40 +0200 (sam 13 aoû 2011) | 10 lignes
Chemins modifiés :
   M /head/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c

When falloc() was broken into separate falloc_noinstall() and finstall(),
a bug was introduced in kern_openat() such that the error from the vnode
open operation was overwritten before it was passed as an argument to
dupfdopen().  This broke operations on /dev/{stdin,stdout,stderr}.  Fix
by preserving the original error number across finstall() so that it is
still available.

Approved by:re (kib)
Reported by:cognet



You won't be able to buildworld with the buggy kernel, but you can
buildkernel and reboot on the new kernel. No problems with portsnap
after that (don't know if you have to clean the old portsnap files, I
did it).

-- 
Olivier Smedts                                                 _
                                        ASCII ribbon campaign ( )
e-mail: oliv...@gid0.org        - against HTML email & vCards  X
www: http://www.gid0.org    - against proprietary attachments / \

  "Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde :
  ceux qui comprennent le binaire,
  et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas."
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2011-08-14 Thread Alexander Best
On Sun Aug 14 11, Niclas Zeising wrote:
> On 2011-08-13 12:08, Roland Smith wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> >> On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> >>>> On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> >>>>>>>> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
> >>> Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are the
> >>> permissions et cetera OK?
> >>>
> >>> Roland
> >>
> >> No, it does not.
> >>
> >> What I did so far over night:
> >>
> >> I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again. 
> >> Again failure.
> >> After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports). 
> >> Everything seems
> >> all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a 
> >> non-portsnap-created /usr/ports
> >> and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very 
> >> same failure:
> >>
> >> (portsnap fetch extract:)
> >> /usr/ports/devel//
> >> /usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/
> >> /usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/
> >> /usr/ports/devel/cdash/
> >> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz 
> >> not 
> >> found -- snapshot corrupt.
> > 
> > I've been looking at the portsnap shellscript. This error message is 
> > generated
> > by the shell's built-in test command, specifically '[ -r'. It is looking 
> > for a
> > file that was extracted with tar. So the place to look for the bug is IMO
> > 
> > 1) the portsnap script itself (differences between 8.2 and 9?)
> > 2) the sh(1)'s built-in test command (ditto)
> > 3) tar (ditto)
> > 
> > When you run 'portsnap fetch' it downloads a tgz archive and unpacks it with
> > tar(1). What you could try is to comment out the line 'rm 
> > ${SNAPSHOTHASH}.tgz'
> > in portsnap, and test if the tgz file extracts differently using an
> > 8.2-RELEASE tar and the 9-CURRENT tar.  If so, that would be a bug!
> > 
> > Roland
> 
> Just a "me too!". It happens for me on a recently updated 9-current
> virtual machine, built with clang.

same here:

/usr/ports/databases/gigabase/
/usr/ports/databases/godis/
files/39644d98f9e9b9d9a362cbfc075a996683e8a611a4362d883247c9a2e2fa2658.gz not 
found -- snapshot corrupt.

running r224841 on amd64 built with base clang.

> Regards!
> -- 
> Niclas
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2011-08-14 Thread Olivier Smedts
2011/8/14 Hartmann, O. :
> On 08/14/11 11:48, Niclas Zeising wrote:
>>
>> On 2011-08-13 12:08, Roland Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are the
>>>>> permissions et cetera OK?
>>>>>
>>>>> Roland
>>>>
>>>> No, it does not.
>>>>
>>>> What I did so far over night:
>>>>
>>>> I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again.
>>>> Again failure.
>>>> After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports).
>>>> Everything seems
>>>> all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a
>>>> non-portsnap-created /usr/ports
>>>> and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very
>>>> same failure:
>>>>
>>>> (portsnap fetch extract:)
>>>> /usr/ports/devel//
>>>> /usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/
>>>> /usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/
>>>> /usr/ports/devel/cdash/
>>>>
>>>> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
>>>> not
>>>> found -- snapshot corrupt.
>>>
>>> I've been looking at the portsnap shellscript. This error message is
>>> generated
>>> by the shell's built-in test command, specifically '[ -r'. It is looking
>>> for a
>>> file that was extracted with tar. So the place to look for the bug is IMO
>>>
>>> 1) the portsnap script itself (differences between 8.2 and 9?)
>>> 2) the sh(1)'s built-in test command (ditto)
>>> 3) tar (ditto)
>>>
>>> When you run 'portsnap fetch' it downloads a tgz archive and unpacks it
>>> with
>>> tar(1). What you could try is to comment out the line 'rm
>>> ${SNAPSHOTHASH}.tgz'
>>> in portsnap, and test if the tgz file extracts differently using an
>>> 8.2-RELEASE tar and the 9-CURRENT tar.  If so, that would be a bug!
>>>
>>> Roland
>>
>> Just a "me too!". It happens for me on a recently updated 9-current
>> virtual machine, built with clang.
>> Regards!
>
> Just got a notebook, build with the old gcc 4.2 of the system FreeBSD
> 9.0/amd64 -r224579: portsnap works as expected.
>
> I will build a most recent system on that box (with systems's outdated gcc
> 4.2) and I'll report if the problem is still present.
>
> By the way: My boxes of failure are all built with CLANG.
>
> Oliver

Trying again today, with my 9.0-BETA1 amd64 box built with clang.

Not the same error, but the same kind when using "portsnap extract" :
/usr/ports/lang/p5-JavaScript-Value-Escape/
/usr/ports/lang/p5-JavaScript/
/usr/ports/lang/p5-List-MoreUtils/
/usr/ports/lang/p5-Modern-Perl/
/usr/ports/lang/p5-POE-Component-Hailo/
files/b54a58da6d23d31f19a9105f70af03ef797aba8db6bdbc03d6deb72e62011d56.gz
not found -- snapshot corrupt.

This file is not present in /var/db/portsnap/files/.

# ll /var/db/portsnap/files/ | wc -l
   22862

This was after removing /var/db/portsnap/files/ and
/var/db/portsnap/t* and a fresh "portsnap fetch", on the portsnap5
mirror.

# fetch 
http://portsnap5.freebsd.org/s/c9a2c992e8bde0c98309f76a0ecfb00eb76558c7c3dcbd0405a88316b775e66b.tgz
# tar tf c9a2c992e8bde0c98309f76a0ecfb00eb76558c7c3dcbd0405a88316b775e66b.tgz
| grep b54a58
nothing...

I tried on portsnap2 and the file was not present in
c9a2c992e8bde0c98309f76a0ecfb00eb76558c7c3dcbd0405a88316b775e66b.tgz

-- 
Olivier Smedts                                                 _
                                        ASCII ribbon campaign ( )
e-mail: oliv...@gid0.org        - against HTML email & vCards  X
www: http://www.gid0.org    - against proprietary attachments / \

  "Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde :
  ceux qui comprennent le binaire,
  et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas."
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2011-08-14 Thread Hartmann, O.

On 08/14/11 11:48, Niclas Zeising wrote:

On 2011-08-13 12:08, Roland Smith wrote:

On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:

On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote:

On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:

On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote:

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:

files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz

Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are the
permissions et cetera OK?

Roland

No, it does not.

What I did so far over night:

I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again.
Again failure.
After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports).
Everything seems
all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a
non-portsnap-created /usr/ports
and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very
same failure:

(portsnap fetch extract:)
/usr/ports/devel//
/usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/
/usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/
/usr/ports/devel/cdash/
files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not
found -- snapshot corrupt.

I've been looking at the portsnap shellscript. This error message is generated
by the shell's built-in test command, specifically '[ -r'. It is looking for a
file that was extracted with tar. So the place to look for the bug is IMO

1) the portsnap script itself (differences between 8.2 and 9?)
2) the sh(1)'s built-in test command (ditto)
3) tar (ditto)

When you run 'portsnap fetch' it downloads a tgz archive and unpacks it with
tar(1). What you could try is to comment out the line 'rm ${SNAPSHOTHASH}.tgz'
in portsnap, and test if the tgz file extracts differently using an
8.2-RELEASE tar and the 9-CURRENT tar.  If so, that would be a bug!

Roland

Just a "me too!". It happens for me on a recently updated 9-current
virtual machine, built with clang.
Regards!


Just got a notebook, build with the old gcc 4.2 of the system FreeBSD 
9.0/amd64 -r224579: portsnap works as expected.


I will build a most recent system on that box (with systems's outdated 
gcc 4.2) and I'll report if the problem is still present.


By the way: My boxes of failure are all built with CLANG.

Oliver
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2011-08-14 Thread Niclas Zeising
On 2011-08-13 12:08, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>>>> On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>>>>>>>> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
>>> Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are the
>>> permissions et cetera OK?
>>>
>>> Roland
>>
>> No, it does not.
>>
>> What I did so far over night:
>>
>> I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again. 
>> Again failure.
>> After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports). 
>> Everything seems
>> all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a 
>> non-portsnap-created /usr/ports
>> and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very 
>> same failure:
>>
>> (portsnap fetch extract:)
>> /usr/ports/devel//
>> /usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/
>> /usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/
>> /usr/ports/devel/cdash/
>> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz 
>> not 
>> found -- snapshot corrupt.
> 
> I've been looking at the portsnap shellscript. This error message is generated
> by the shell's built-in test command, specifically '[ -r'. It is looking for a
> file that was extracted with tar. So the place to look for the bug is IMO
> 
> 1) the portsnap script itself (differences between 8.2 and 9?)
> 2) the sh(1)'s built-in test command (ditto)
> 3) tar (ditto)
> 
> When you run 'portsnap fetch' it downloads a tgz archive and unpacks it with
> tar(1). What you could try is to comment out the line 'rm ${SNAPSHOTHASH}.tgz'
> in portsnap, and test if the tgz file extracts differently using an
> 8.2-RELEASE tar and the 9-CURRENT tar.  If so, that would be a bug!
> 
> Roland

Just a "me too!". It happens for me on a recently updated 9-current
virtual machine, built with clang.
Regards!
-- 
Niclas
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2011-08-13 Thread Roland Smith
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> >> On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> >>>>>> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
> > Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are the
> > permissions et cetera OK?
> >
> > Roland
> 
> No, it does not.
> 
> What I did so far over night:
> 
> I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again. 
> Again failure.
> After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports). 
> Everything seems
> all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a 
> non-portsnap-created /usr/ports
> and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very 
> same failure:
> 
> (portsnap fetch extract:)
> /usr/ports/devel//
> /usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/
> /usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/
> /usr/ports/devel/cdash/
> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not 
> found -- snapshot corrupt.

I've been looking at the portsnap shellscript. This error message is generated
by the shell's built-in test command, specifically '[ -r'. It is looking for a
file that was extracted with tar. So the place to look for the bug is IMO

1) the portsnap script itself (differences between 8.2 and 9?)
2) the sh(1)'s built-in test command (ditto)
3) tar (ditto)

When you run 'portsnap fetch' it downloads a tgz archive and unpacks it with
tar(1). What you could try is to comment out the line 'rm ${SNAPSHOTHASH}.tgz'
in portsnap, and test if the tgz file extracts differently using an
8.2-RELEASE tar and the 9-CURRENT tar.  If so, that would be a bug!

Roland
-- 
R.F.Smith   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)


pgpZ0qmATYvWX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2011-08-13 Thread Hartmann, O.

On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote:

On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:

On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote:

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:

files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz

Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are the
permissions et cetera OK?

Roland


No, it does not.

What I did so far over night:

I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again. 
Again failure.
After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports). 
Everything seems
all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a 
non-portsnap-created /usr/ports
and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very 
same failure:


(portsnap fetch extract:)
/usr/ports/devel//
/usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/
/usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/
/usr/ports/devel/cdash/
files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not 
found -- snapshot corrupt.


Oliver

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2011-08-13 Thread Roland Smith
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>  files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz

Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are the
permissions et cetera OK?

Roland
-- 
R.F.Smith   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)


pgpXSyMn0lIgR.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2011-08-12 Thread Hartmann, O.

On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote:

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:

files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz

This file is relatively recent; When I used portsnap yesterday, it wasn't
there, and now it is.

I do a postrmaster on a nearly daily basis. This occured this morning
(German standard time) to me the first time.

I did a portsnap just before my previous mail. It downloaded and extracted the
particular file without problem.


Have you fscked the volume that contains /var? If not I suggest you do. You
might be looking at filesystem corruption.

No I did not. If this is a inconsistent filesystem (I thought about this
also), then it
has occured on ALL(!) FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 boxes over night (this i
why I thought about the filesystem, since the FreeBSD 8.2/amd64-boxes do
not show this problem as I mentioned at the start of the post, my mistake).

Another data-point: I'm on 8.2-RELEASE amd64 as well and it doesn't show a
problem. So it could well be a CURRENT specific problem. But I would think
that the filesystem code would be pretty mature by now. Maybe some changes in
VFS?
I have a FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE/amd64 server at my lab, no problems. My 
workstation, my laptop and my box at home are all FreeBSD 
9.0-CURRENT/amd64, recent system (r224803) and they have all without 
exception this problem.





I'll force a fsck as soon as possible. I started the boxes already and
they didn't show up any unclean filesystem so far ...

Since portsnap cannot find the file in question, I assume you have checked
that it existed and that it was a normal file etc?

Could it be a hardware issue? Some time ago I began to have random filesystem
corruption and lockups. After cleaning out two years worth of dust out of the
machine in question it now runs fine again.

Roland
No hardware issue. This hardware issue must have occured on three 
different systems the same time. An unlikely coincidence.


I did a complete fsck. No problems with the filesystem.
But the problem remains. Again, I'll delete /var/db/portsnap and if it 
doesn't help, I'll also delete /usr/ports ...


Oliver

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2011-08-12 Thread Roland Smith
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> >> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
> > This file is relatively recent; When I used portsnap yesterday, it wasn't
> > there, and now it is.
> I do a postrmaster on a nearly daily basis. This occured this morning 
> (German standard time) to me the first time.

I did a portsnap just before my previous mail. It downloaded and extracted the
particular file without problem.

> > Have you fscked the volume that contains /var? If not I suggest you do. You
> > might be looking at filesystem corruption.
> No I did not. If this is a inconsistent filesystem (I thought about this 
> also), then it
> has occured on ALL(!) FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 boxes over night (this i 
> why I thought about the filesystem, since the FreeBSD 8.2/amd64-boxes do 
> not show this problem as I mentioned at the start of the post, my mistake).

Another data-point: I'm on 8.2-RELEASE amd64 as well and it doesn't show a
problem. So it could well be a CURRENT specific problem. But I would think
that the filesystem code would be pretty mature by now. Maybe some changes in
VFS?

> I'll force a fsck as soon as possible. I started the boxes already and 
> they didn't show up any unclean filesystem so far ...

Since portsnap cannot find the file in question, I assume you have checked
that it existed and that it was a normal file etc?

Could it be a hardware issue? Some time ago I began to have random filesystem
corruption and lockups. After cleaning out two years worth of dust out of the
machine in question it now runs fine again.

Roland
-- 
R.F.Smith   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)


pgpsilkrOl7qS.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2011-08-12 Thread Hartmann, O.

On 08/12/11 20:21, Roland Smith wrote:

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:38:06PM +0200, Olivier Smedts wrote:

2011/8/12 Roland Smith:

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:46:37PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:

Since today, I can not update my ports tree due to this error as follows.
This happens on all boxes running FreeBSD, the version of the OS (FBSD
8.2/9.0) doesn't
matter. What's up with the ports collection?

Probably nothing.


files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not
found -- snapshot corrupt.

This looks like a portsnap error. Remove everything in /var/db/portsnap, and
run 'portsnap fetch extract'.

Same error here and after removing all files in /var/db/portsnap/
except pub.ssl and serverlist*.

Did you clean out the files subdirectory as well? Try and remove
/var/db/portsnap completely.


I did ... I figured out that the files folder was populated with 90MB 
and > 22000 files. I checked that after the error occured and then 
killed the whole postsnap folder ...





files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz

This file is relatively recent; When I used portsnap yesterday, it wasn't
there, and now it is.
I do a postrmaster on a nearly daily basis. This occured this morning 
(German standard time) to me the first time.


Have you fscked the volume that contains /var? If not I suggest you do. You
might be looking at filesystem corruption.
No I did not. If this is a inconsistent filesystem (I thought about this 
also), then it
has occured on ALL(!) FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 boxes over night (this i 
why I thought about the filesystem, since the FreeBSD 8.2/amd64-boxes do 
not show this problem as I mentioned at the start of the post, my mistake).


I'll force a fsck as soon as possible. I started the boxes already and 
they didn't show up any unclean filesystem so far ...


Oliver


Roland


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2011-08-12 Thread Roland Smith
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:38:06PM +0200, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> 2011/8/12 Roland Smith :
> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:46:37PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> >> Since today, I can not update my ports tree due to this error as follows.
> >> This happens on all boxes running FreeBSD, the version of the OS (FBSD
> >> 8.2/9.0) doesn't
> >> matter. What's up with the ports collection?
> >
> > Probably nothing.
> >
> >> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz 
> >> not
> >> found -- snapshot corrupt.
> >
> > This looks like a portsnap error. Remove everything in /var/db/portsnap, and
> > run 'portsnap fetch extract'.
> 
> Same error here and after removing all files in /var/db/portsnap/
> except pub.ssl and serverlist*.

Did you clean out the files subdirectory as well? Try and remove
/var/db/portsnap completely.

> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz

This file is relatively recent; When I used portsnap yesterday, it wasn't
there, and now it is.

Have you fscked the volume that contains /var? If not I suggest you do. You
might be looking at filesystem corruption.

Roland
-- 
R.F.Smith   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)


pgpp11sZlONJS.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2011-08-12 Thread Hartmann, O.

On 08/12/11 19:16, Roland Smith wrote:

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:46:37PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:

Since today, I can not update my ports tree due to this error as follows.
This happens on all boxes running FreeBSD, the version of the OS (FBSD
8.2/9.0) doesn't
matter. What's up with the ports collection?

Probably nothing.


files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not
found -- snapshot corrupt.

This looks like a portsnap error. Remove everything in /var/db/portsnap, and
run 'portsnap fetch extract'.

Roland

That was the first I did ... but it doesn't help.

Oliver
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2011-08-12 Thread Olivier Smedts
2011/8/12 Roland Smith :
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:46:37PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> Since today, I can not update my ports tree due to this error as follows.
>> This happens on all boxes running FreeBSD, the version of the OS (FBSD
>> 8.2/9.0) doesn't
>> matter. What's up with the ports collection?
>
> Probably nothing.
>
>> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not
>> found -- snapshot corrupt.
>
> This looks like a portsnap error. Remove everything in /var/db/portsnap, and
> run 'portsnap fetch extract'.

Same error here and after removing all files in /var/db/portsnap/
except pub.ssl and serverlist*.

# portsnap fetch
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap6.FreeBSD.org... done.
Fetching snapshot metadata... done.
Fetching snapshot generated at Fri Aug 12 02:12:43 CEST 2011:
2296564b5c42a1560759bece15b4c98074658e52fbed23100% of   63 MB  508 kBps 00m00s
Extracting snapshot... done.
Verifying snapshot integrity... done.
Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap6.FreeBSD.org... done.
Fetching snapshot metadata... done.
Updating from Fri Aug 12 02:12:43 CEST 2011 to Fri Aug 12 19:03:17 CEST 2011.
Fetching 3 metadata patches. done.
Applying metadata patches... done.
Fetching 1 metadata files... done.
Fetching 54 patches. done.
Applying patches... done.
Fetching 27 new ports or files... done.

# portsnap extract
[...]
/usr/ports/devel/ccache/
/usr/ports/devel/cccc/
/usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/
/usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/
/usr/ports/devel/cdash/
files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
not found -- snapshot corrupt.

>
> Roland
> --
> R.F.Smith                                   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
> [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
> pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)
>



-- 
Olivier Smedts                                                 _
                                        ASCII ribbon campaign ( )
e-mail: oliv...@gid0.org        - against HTML email & vCards  X
www: http://www.gid0.org    - against proprietary attachments / \

  "Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde :
  ceux qui comprennent le binaire,
  et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas."
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2011-08-12 Thread Jerry
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:16:11 +0200
Roland Smith articulated:

> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:46:37PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> > Since today, I can not update my ports tree due to this error as
> > follows. This happens on all boxes running FreeBSD, the version of
> > the OS (FBSD 8.2/9.0) doesn't
> > matter. What's up with the ports collection?
> 
> Probably nothing.
> 
> > files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
> > not found -- snapshot corrupt.
> 
> This looks like a portsnap error. Remove everything
> in /var/db/portsnap, and run 'portsnap fetch extract'.

I get this crap from time to time also. It seems dependent upon which
mirror portsnap uses at a given time. It always corrects itself in
anywhere from a few hours to a few days. You can also try forcing it to
use another mirror.

-- 
Jerry ✌
jerry+f...@seibercom.net

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or ignored.
Do not CC this poster. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.

http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2011-08-12 Thread Roland Smith
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:46:37PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> Since today, I can not update my ports tree due to this error as follows.
> This happens on all boxes running FreeBSD, the version of the OS (FBSD 
> 8.2/9.0) doesn't
> matter. What's up with the ports collection?

Probably nothing.

> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not 
> found -- snapshot corrupt.

This looks like a portsnap error. Remove everything in /var/db/portsnap, and
run 'portsnap fetch extract'.

Roland
-- 
R.F.Smith   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)


pgpBFFiEast0j.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2011-08-12 Thread Michael Powell
Hartmann, O. wrote:

> Since today, I can not update my ports tree due to this error as follows.
> This happens on all boxes running FreeBSD, the version of the OS (FBSD
> 8.2/9.0) doesn't
> matter. What's up with the ports collection?

Nothing wrong with ports. Just csup'd 2 machines and all is fine.
 
> Regards,
> 
> Oliver
> 
> Extracting new files:
> /usr/ports/GIDs
> /usr/ports/UIDs
> /usr/ports/audio/teamspeak3-server/
> /usr/ports/audio/xmms-fc/
> /usr/ports/cad/admesh/
> /usr/ports/databases/postgresql82-server/
> /usr/ports/databases/postgresql83-server/
> /usr/ports/databases/postgresql84-server/
> /usr/ports/databases/postgresql90-server/
> /usr/ports/devel/Makefile
> /usr/ports/devel/cdash/
> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
> not found -- snapshot corrupt.
> 

This smacks of either you downloaded a corrupt file or it was corrupted 
during decompression. If the former others will experience same, if the 
latter it's either your hardware or your software. Test out gzip on some 
compressed file you know you've ungzipped before. Overclocking and 
overheated CPU/RAM, or other forms of intermittent glitches (excessive 
ripple under load on an aged power supply) can play havoc with decompression 
programs.

-Mike

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2011-08-12 Thread Olivier Smedts
2011/8/12 Polytropon :
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:46:37 +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> Since today, I can not update my ports tree due to this error as follows.
>> This happens on all boxes running FreeBSD, the version of the OS (FBSD
>> 8.2/9.0) doesn't
>> matter. What's up with the ports collection?
>
> You're using portsnap? What if you try to update per CVS?
>
>
>
>> /usr/ports/devel/cdash/
>> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not
>> found -- snapshot corrupt.
>
> I think this last message got a bit de-arranged by quoting.
> The file with the long name belongs to /usr/ports/devel/cdash/files/
> as it seems, but that doesn't exist (at least not on my
> local ports tree). A "cdash" port doesn't exist in the
> whole ports tree.

No, the file does not belong in /usr/ports/devel/cdash/files/. You
should read /var/db/portsnap/files/.

>
> --
> Polytropon
> Magdeburg, Germany
> Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
> Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
>
> ___
> freebsd-po...@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>



-- 
Olivier Smedts                                                 _
                                        ASCII ribbon campaign ( )
e-mail: oliv...@gid0.org        - against HTML email & vCards  X
www: http://www.gid0.org    - against proprietary attachments / \

  "Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde :
  ceux qui comprennent le binaire,
  et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas."
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2011-08-12 Thread Polytropon
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:46:37 +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> Since today, I can not update my ports tree due to this error as follows.
> This happens on all boxes running FreeBSD, the version of the OS (FBSD 
> 8.2/9.0) doesn't
> matter. What's up with the ports collection?

You're using portsnap? What if you try to update per CVS?



> /usr/ports/devel/cdash/
> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not 
> found -- snapshot corrupt.

I think this last message got a bit de-arranged by quoting.
The file with the long name belongs to /usr/ports/devel/cdash/files/
as it seems, but that doesn't exist (at least not on my
local ports tree). A "cdash" port doesn't exist in the
whole ports tree.






-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2011-08-12 Thread Hartmann, O.

Since today, I can not update my ports tree due to this error as follows.
This happens on all boxes running FreeBSD, the version of the OS (FBSD 
8.2/9.0) doesn't

matter. What's up with the ports collection?

Regards,

Oliver

Extracting new files:
/usr/ports/GIDs
/usr/ports/UIDs
/usr/ports/audio/teamspeak3-server/
/usr/ports/audio/xmms-fc/
/usr/ports/cad/admesh/
/usr/ports/databases/postgresql82-server/
/usr/ports/databases/postgresql83-server/
/usr/ports/databases/postgresql84-server/
/usr/ports/databases/postgresql90-server/
/usr/ports/devel/Makefile
/usr/ports/devel/cdash/
files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not 
found -- snapshot corrupt.


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"