On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:35:05 +1100 (EST) Ian Smith wrote:
>
> > Is fpc's IDE usable, like good ol' TP6 and 7, never mind Delphi?
>
> Usable.
Thanks for confirmation, Boris, 'usable' and 'working OK' are good
enough. I installed it on my Thinkp
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:35:05 +1100 (EST), Ian Smith
wrote:
> Is fpc's IDE usable, like good ol' TP6 and 7, never mind Delphi?
Maybe you're interested in xwpe (X window programming environment)
which delivers quite a good look & feel of TP7 (DOS). There's
xwpe for X, and wpe for text mode. But I
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:35:05 +1100 (EST) Ian Smith wrote:
> Is fpc's IDE usable, like good ol' TP6 and 7, never mind Delphi?
Usable.
> Docs
> seem vast, I'm wondering if there's a simple guide to basic compilation,
> but basically I'd just like to hear that it's working ok for someone and
>
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 11:16:29 -0500, Eduardo Morras
wrote:
Is fpc's IDE usable, like good ol' TP6 and 7, never mind Delphi? Docs
seem vast, I'm wondering if there's a simple guide to basic compilation,
but basically I'd just like to hear that it's working ok for someone and
is worth the learnin
At 15:35 29/12/2009, you wrote:
>Hi to ..
>
>any old Turbo Pascal hackers out there, who've used fpc on FreeBSD.
>
>I have some astronomy and sound related code from last century that I
>want to resume working on. Mostly lots of float number-crunching and
>file process
Hi to ..
any old Turbo Pascal hackers out there, who've used fpc on FreeBSD.
I have some astronomy and sound related code from last century that I
want to resume working on. Mostly lots of float number-crunching and
file processing, no gui stuff till the underlying processing all goes.
