Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Sunday 30 November 2008 06:57:29 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, everyone. This is the problem: our SCSI disk with FreeBSD
4.8 on it has been failing recently, so I copied its root partition
to a fresh IDE disk with cp -pR and
You should use dump and restore to copy
On Sunday 30 November 2008 06:57:29 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, everyone. This is the problem: our SCSI disk with FreeBSD
4.8 on it has been failing recently, so I copied its root partition
to a fresh IDE disk with cp -pR and
You should use dump and restore to copy the root partition
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:37:09 +0400
admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, everyone. This is the problem: our SCSI disk with FreeBSD 4.8
on it has been failing recently, so I copied its root partition to a
fresh IDE disk with cp -pR and
You should use dump and restore to copy the root
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 11:37 AM, admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, everyone. This is the problem: our SCSI disk with FreeBSD 4.8 on it
has been failing recently, so I copied its root partition to a fresh IDE
disk with cp -pR and tried to boot from that. Unfortunately, loader gives me
Hello, everyone. This is the problem: our SCSI disk with FreeBSD 4.8
on it has been failing recently, so I copied its root partition to a
fresh IDE disk with cp -pR and
You should use dump and restore to copy the root partition, see:
I'd done that before trying cp -pR, as outlined by rse
Hi,
My machine runs FreeBSD 4.8 as shown below;
FreeBSD Oneworld.zamnet.zm 4.8 - RELEASE FreeBSD 4.8 RELEASE # Mon Oct
13:10:42:50CAT 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/LOCAL
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/LOCAL%20i386 i386
My machine is generation
Hi,
My machine runs FreeBSD 4.8 as shown below;
My machine is generation the following errors:
Error 1
May 21 03:02:20 oneworld sendmail[7750]: 14L12KXx007750: SYSERR(root):
queueup: Cannot create queue temp file tf14L12KXx007750, uid=25: No
space on
device
Error 2
Oneworld squid error
Hello,
here is the output from top -S :
last pid: 1570; load averages: 0.56, 0.20, 0.10
up 0+02:59:36 14:03:53
76 processes: 4 running, 47 sleeping, 2 stopped, 23 waiting
CPU states: 14.9% user, 0.0% nice, 57.4% system, 27.7% interrupt, 0.0% idle
Mem: 17M Active, 6084K Inact, 14M Wired,
Bohuslav Plucinsky wrote:
I've tried PF, suggested by Martin Hudec and it seems that PF does not
have this performance problem. I like IPFW, I use it since year 1999,
but probably is time to switch to PF.
The impact you receive is caused by user-level 'natd'. Use 'ipnat(8)'
instead as it is
Hello,
I use the FreeBSD box as the firewall with NAT (ipfw + natd).
When I've upgraded the box from 4.8-20030810-STABLE to 6.0-RELEASE
I've noticed a performance degradation.
I've only one workstation behind the firewall and throughput
of downloading an ISO image through the firewall with
- Original Message -
From: Bohuslav Plucinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 2:10 PM
Subject: Low network performance after upgrade from FreeBSD 4.8 to 6.0
Hello,
I use the FreeBSD box as the firewall
Hello,
Bohuslav Plucinsky wrote:
I use the FreeBSD box as the firewall with NAT (ipfw + natd).
When I've upgraded the box from 4.8-20030810-STABLE to 6.0-RELEASE
I've noticed a performance degradation.
CPU states: 8.8% user, 0.0% nice, 59.6% system, 31.6% interrupt, 0.0% idle
PID
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:10:20PM +0100, Bohuslav Plucinsky wrote:
The top utility shows 100% CPU load:
What about top -S to show the kernel threads (since that's what's
using 90% of your CPU)?
last pid: 771; load averages: 0.25, 0.06, 0.02
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 03:33:33PM +0100, OxY wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Bohuslav Plucinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 2:10 PM
Subject: Low network performance after upgrade from FreeBSD 4.8
I have been trying to install mysql 4.1.10a on freebsd 4.8 but I get
the following error:
SuffFindDeps (pre-fetch)
No known suffix on pre-fetch. Using .NULL suffix
not adding suffix rules
pre-fetch:@ = pre-fetch
pre-fetch:* = pre-fetch
Examining pre-fetch...non-existent...non-existent
Hello
I am facing some problems with installing FreeBSD 4.8.
This is my computer configuration:
Build from a barbone system by ASUS; Terminator P4 533.
With 256 megs of Ram. Integrated SiS video card. And a 40 Gigs hard drive named
Maxtor 6E040L0. When I boot from the cd with custom configuration
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 01:36:29PM +0100, Richard Jansson wrote:
Hello
I am facing some problems with installing FreeBSD 4.8.
Try a later release.
Kris
pgpLda4fg7nbm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 07:36 am, Richard Jansson wrote:
Hello
computer tell me thats it reseting the console. Num lock and
Caps lock stops working. And on the display i can read these
words reseting ata0
can you be more specific on this error?
Mike
Hi all, I was wondering if anyone knows of a workaround for this problem. I see
this question has been posted awhile back but couldnt find a reply. Other tape
operations seem to be working but I cannot erase a used tape. I know this has
worked in the past so not sure if something has changed in
I would like to learn FreeBSD 4.8 (I think I have a copy)
What I need to know, what does it require?
CPU?
RAM?
Hard Drive Space?
I would like to assamble a small computer from stuff I have for learning
purposes, Thank you for your time.
Jerry Hoover
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Jerry Hoover wrote:
I would like to learn FreeBSD 4.8 (I think I have a copy)
What I need to know, what does it require?
CPU?
RAM?
Hard Drive Space?
A 486-grade CPU or later, 16MB of RAM, and 1 GB of disk space is
something resembling a minimum configuration. If you want
Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Jerry Hoover wrote:
I would like to learn FreeBSD 4.8 (I think I have a copy)
What I need to know, what does it require?
CPU?
RAM?
Hard Drive Space?
A 486-grade CPU or later, 16MB of RAM, and 1 GB of disk space is
something resembling
Jerry Hoover wrote:
I would like to learn FreeBSD 4.8 (I think I have a copy)
What I need to know, what does it require?
CPU?
RAM?
Hard Drive Space?
A 486-grade CPU or later, 16MB of RAM, and 1 GB of disk space is something
resembling a minimum configuration. If you want to run a GUI
Has anyone tried using Backup Exec to backup files on FreeBSD 4.8 over Samba
(samba-2.2.9_1)? This is dirt slow. Has anyone else seen this problem? Do
you have a solution?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
I need to know the difference between FreeBSD 4.8 and
FreeBSD 5.x lower version of 5.x difference. I am
acquiring Verisign as my Ecommerce who only has an SDK
for 5.x. Need to know the difference between 4.8 and
5.0 so I know whether or not I am going to run into
problems. Also can you tell me
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 01:39:17PM -0700, bridgett hamilton wrote:
I need to know the difference between FreeBSD 4.8 and
FreeBSD 5.x lower version of 5.x difference. I am
acquiring Verisign as my Ecommerce who only has an SDK
for 5.x. Need to know the difference between 4.8 and
5.0 so I know
test
__
Bu Elektronik Posta hizmeti MOR-TEL Telekom tarafýndan saðlanmaktadýr.
http://www.mortel.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Can someone tell me how to get the FreeBSD 4.8 install CD to recognize my
Dell RAID array? It needs the aac driver and it's not enabled on the 4.8
GENERIC kernel.
Thanks,
Brian Smith
Associate Analyst/Programming
(304)466-1065 ext. 207
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Can someone tell me how to get the FreeBSD 4.8 install CD to recognize my
Dell RAID array? It needs the aac driver and it's not enabled on the 4.8
GENERIC kernel.
You may need to go to the 5.2.1 version.
jerry
Thanks,
Brian Smith
Associate Analyst/Programming
(304)466-1065 ext
Can someone tell me how to get the FreeBSD 4.8 install CD to recognize my
Dell RAID array? It needs the aac driver and it's not enabled on the 4.8
GENERIC kernel.
You may need to go to the 5.2.1 version.
The aac driver was first introduced in 4.3, but it has come to support
more
At 02:22 PM 7/20/2004, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Can someone tell me how to get the FreeBSD 4.8 install CD to recognize my
Dell RAID array? It needs the aac driver and it's not enabled on the 4.8
GENERIC kernel.
You may need to go to the 5.2.1 version.
The aac driver was first introduced
At 02:22 PM 7/20/2004, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Can someone tell me how to get the FreeBSD 4.8 install CD to recognize my
Dell RAID array? It needs the aac driver and it's not enabled on the 4.8
GENERIC kernel.
You may need to go to the 5.2.1 version.
The aac driver
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 7:47 AM
Subject: RE: Problem with FreeBSD 4.8, ipf, ipfnat and forwarding for
pcAnywhere
For your telnet test to pcanywhere ports on target Lan pc to work
you have to tell telnet on the target to listen on those ports.
I believe pcanywhere is one of those
adp wrote:
I am using telnet just to see if the port accepts connections. That test
works fine internally. We are not running a telnet server. Also, we are
telnetting to the pcAnywhere port, not the telnet port. :)
I've only historical experience with PCAnywhere, nowadays sticking with
VNC
pcanywhere to work on and you should be good to go.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of adp
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 12:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problem with FreeBSD 4.8, ipf, ipfnat and forwarding for
pcAnywhere
This shouldn't
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 11:37:09PM -0500, adp wrote:
And I am allowing in accessing via ipf:
pass in quick proto tcp from any to public-ip port = 5631 group 200
pass in quick proto udp from any to public-ip port = 5631 group 200
pass in quick proto tcp from any to public-ip port = 5632 group
This shouldn't be that hard, but I can't get it working.
I have a FreeBSD firewall with three NICs (Internet, LAN, DMZ). I have
bridging enabled between the Internet and DMZ interfaces.
I now have an internal computer (LAN) that needs to be accessible via
pcAnywhere.
I can telnet to the
very interested in
FreeBSD and I still availlable for comments... Have a nice day! Ho i Forgot:
FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE #0: Thu Apr 3 10:53:38 GMT 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 01:38:47PM +0200, MaXX wrote:
Good afternoon,
I have installed FreeBSD 4.8Release on a machine to experiment settings
before attempting to place them on my server. Due to a problem with the
port system on this machine I decided to reinstall only the port system via
Hi ,
I didn't find any memory detection tool foir FreeBSD 4.8.
Any idea how can i detect memory leaks in freeBSD 4.8
Looking for an early reply.
Thanks
Jitendra
-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th
In the last episode (Apr 12), jitendra pande said:
I didn't find any memory detection tool foir FreeBSD 4.8.
Any idea how can i detect memory leaks in freeBSD 4.8
dmalloc in ports (ports/devel/dmalloc) is very useful for catching
leaks.
--
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Greetings,
I noticed that Gnome 2.6 is not supported on FBSD 4.8. Has anyone tried
running the upgrade script on 4.8 yet? What is the reason it is not
supported? (Other than forcing folks to upgrade...) Are there any
workarounds or hacks to get Gnome 2.6 play nicely with 4.8?
Thanks,
Frank
--
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 21:20, Frank Knobbe wrote:
Greetings,
I noticed that Gnome 2.6 is not supported on FBSD 4.8. Has anyone tried
running the upgrade script on 4.8 yet? What is the reason it is not
supported? (Other than forcing folks to upgrade...) Are there any
workarounds or hacks to
Hello
I wanna know if possible that will get support for Promise SATA
150TX2plus
in freebsd/i386 4.8 relase, cause don´t show in hardwares Notes
if´s possible please let me know
Thanks.
_
Las mejores
Hi All,
I have stuck with a problem with usb devices.
In case of FreeBSD 4.8, whenever a new USB device is attached to the
system, no device node is dynamically being created within the dev file
system.
This is in contrast to the behavior there with FreeBSD 5.0 where a new
device node
I have a FreeBSD 4.8 server with a 3ware RAID controller in a RAID5
configuration. The server has an Intel PRO/1000 network card in it.
I'm trying to transfer big (100MB+) files from this server to a Firewire
drive on my Windows XP workstation which also has an Intel PRO/1000 NIC.
The transfer
Hi ,
I am trying to use kernel level mutex in my driver for FreeBSD 4.8. I tried searching
for kernel level mutex but couldn't find one for FreeBSD 4.8.
mtx_lock(..) and other mtx_ kernel level functions are available in FreeBSD 5.0
onwards but not in freeBSD 4.8.
Plaese advice me how
I know this question has been asked, but the answers I find tend to be along
the lines of Well, it's complicated.
How do I determine if my FreeBSD is actually low on memory not? And what is
Inact? I did read the manpages, but even they seem to skirt how I should
view Inact vs. Free. (I did read
Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 03:28:34PM -0600, dap wrote:
How do I determine if my FreeBSD is actually low on memory not? And what is
Inact? I did read the manpages, but even they seem to skirt how I should
view Inact vs. Free. (I did read the tuning manpage.)
Let's say I have
Just bought a Pioneer DVD drive. I hook the DVD drive
up, go to the bios and set everything to *defaults*
and make sure that *ATAPI CD-ROM drive* is set to the
first bootable device. I don't know why it says
ATAPI-CD-ROM drive. Shouldn't it say DVD cause I
replaced the cdrom with the dvd-rom?
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 07:13:02PM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
Why perl 5.8? My 5.2 machine is running postfix, perl 5.6.1 and amavisd-new
without any trouble at all.
perl-5.8.2 is the official stable and recommended version of perl by
the perl developers. Actually, I tell a lie --
On Jan 23, 2004, at 8:13 PM, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
Why perl 5.8? My 5.2 machine is running postfix, perl 5.6.1 and
amavisd-new
without any trouble at all.
I don't believe that there is anything wrong with perl-5.6.x.
For that matter, I don't feel religious opposition to using the stock
I have read through the archives and seen that newer versions of Spamassassin have
fits with freebsd because of an outdated perl version. I noticed that there is a
SpamAssassin 2.6 port out for freeBSD 4.9 but was wondering if anyone has had success
with installing it on a 4.8 system?
Michael
success with
installing it on a 4.8 system?
FreeBSD 4.8 should be recent enough that you can use a modern ports
tree without the CONFLICTS feature causing problems, so use CVSUP to
update your ports tree to the current version. From there, install
/usr/ports/lang/perl5.8, and then run use.perl
At 12:07 PM 1.23.2004 -0600, Michael Whitley wrote:
I have read through the archives and seen that newer versions of
Spamassassin have fits with freebsd because of an outdated perl version. I
noticed that there is a SpamAssassin 2.6 port out for freeBSD 4.9 but was
wondering if anyone has had
Michael Whitley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have read through the archives and seen that newer versions of
Spamassassin have fits with freebsd because of an outdated perl
version. I noticed that there is a SpamAssassin 2.6 port out for
freeBSD 4.9 but was wondering if anyone has had success
for
freeBSD 4.9 but was wondering if anyone has had success with
installing it on a 4.8 system?
FreeBSD 4.8 should be recent enough that you can use a modern ports
tree without the CONFLICTS feature causing problems, so use CVSUP to
update your ports tree to the current version. From
Charles Swiger wrote:
FreeBSD 4.8 should be recent enough that you can use a modern ports
tree without the CONFLICTS feature causing problems, so use CVSUP to
update your ports tree to the current version. From there, install
/usr/ports/lang/perl5.8, and then run use.perl port.
That should
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, John wrote:
I get
Jan 11 18:09:55 pearl /kernel: ata0-slave: ATA identify retries exceeded
I've looked at the sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c code - I wonder if I should
just arbitarily raise the retry count a bit - what's everyone else
ok, i don't know if this is documented
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 04:25:25PM +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, John wrote:
I have an update, additional information...
Instead of getting the device ID line, i.e.
Jan 11 17:56:56 pearl /kernel: acd0: CDROM Compaq CRN-8241B at ata0-slave PIO
I get
Jan 11 18:09:55 pearl
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, John wrote:
Despite the fact that the laptop compatibility base has an entry for this
machine that looks good for FreeBSD 5.0, I'm not having the best luck
that one might hope.
i've got an Armada M300, which shares a lot of the same underlying
hardware as the M700 and
Despite the fact that the laptop compatibility base has an entry for this
machine that looks good for FreeBSD 5.0, I'm not having the best luck
that one might hope.
I've read through the Release notes and Hardware notes, and Errata
on the web site for this release and on the CD (NFS mounted from
Hi, i am using FreeBSD 4.8 with default instalation, FreeBSD detect the
interface, but works very slow!
Thanks,
Exequiel Rivas
-
Mensaje enviado desde K7-NeT
http://www.k7-net.net
___
[EMAIL
I'm running freebsd 4.8-STABLE, I installed it a
little while ago and it has been running fine as
my
broadband router for a few weeks now, no problems.
This morning there was a powercut, and when I came
to
the machine and attached a monitor, I discovered
that
it was making
Hi,
I'm running freebsd 4.8-STABLE, I installed it a
little while ago and it has been running fine as my
broadband router for a few weeks now, no problems.
This morning there was a powercut, and when I came to
the machine and attached a monitor, I discovered that
it was making it through
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 09:28:23AM +, Neil Brown wrote:
I'm running freebsd 4.8-STABLE, I installed it a
little while ago and it has been running fine as my
broadband router for a few weeks now, no problems.
This morning there was a powercut, and when I came to
the machine and attached
Hello,
I have few questions regarding the Dynamic Rouitng (i.e. routed) and gif0
interface.
Questions:
1. There is any in-compatibility or known bug, if we use routed and gif0
interface together (I am using freeBSD 4.8 Release).
2. If there is no known bug then any one tested the above
Is this where I ask for help configuring my mouse, and sound card, and nic card? I
read all documentation before writing this email. I just want to be sure where to
direct my questions before asking them.
thank you
Nickyrock
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message -
From: nw1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.8-P10 --Mouse doesn't move in the console or XFree86--
Alex: please see the update/corrections to this post at
http://69.3.136.141/freebsd
Nickyrock wrote:
Is this where I ask for help configuring my mouse, and sound card, and nic card? I read all documentation before writing this email. I just want to be sure where to direct my questions before asking them.
thank you
Nickyrock
___
I
Hello,
I have recently installed FreeBSD 4.8 and am having trouble getting my
PS/2 mouse to work with X11. Malcolm Kay has kindly suggested some
recourse however this has come to no avail and I was wondering whether
anyone else would have some insights.
The mouse works when setting up moused
What is the model of mouse? serial / ps/2?
more info plz
Hello,
I have recently installed FreeBSD 4.8 and am having trouble getting my
PS/2 mouse to work with X11. Malcolm Kay has kindly suggested some
recourse however this has come to no avail and I was wondering whether
anyone else would
CorePointer
InputDevice Keyboard1 CoreKeyboard
EndSection
-
my X logs :
XFree86 Version 4.3.0
Release Date: 27 February 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6
Build Operating System: FreeBSD 4.8 i386 [ELF]
Build Date: 23 March 2003
Before reporting problems, check http
FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p13
The machine overheats. sysctl variables unable to be seen.
Box-1 = NFS-server (the problem machine)
Box-2 and above are NFS-clients
The short version of the problem: After some overheating issues using:
Two (2) AMD 1800+ MP processors
In a Tyan Tiger MP (S-2460
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 07:12:46AM -0500, nw1 wrote:
This problem can be viewed @ http://69.3.136.141/freebsd/dump8/dump8_issue-1
Hmmm... I don't see why you couldn't just send that to the list. In
summary, you're trying to run dump(8) to a remote file, and it's just
hanging:
dump 0af
How do you have Freebsd 4.8 finish typing a line? On older version I
just type Ma and escape to finish typing Make.
Dan
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
DanB wrote:
How do you have Freebsd 4.8 finish typing a line? On older version I
just type Ma and escape to finish typing Make.
Under csh, you can type CTRL-D
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:37:52AM +, DanB typed:
How do you have Freebsd 4.8 finish typing a line? On older version I
just type Ma and escape to finish typing Make.
That depends on your shell. You're probably used to a bourne-shell variant
like ksh, where ESC is used for word completion
Ruben de Groot writes:
How do you have Freebsd 4.8 finish typing a line? On older version I
just type Ma and escape to finish typing Make.
That depends on your shell. You're probably used to a
bourne-shell variant like ksh, where ESC is used for word
completion. In csh, use
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 08:54:58 -0400
Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ruben de Groot writes:
How do you have Freebsd 4.8 finish typing a line? On older
version I just type Ma and escape to finish typing Make.
That depends on your shell. You're probably used to a
bourne
Folks, I am running
FreeBSD lumiere.ehr3.net 4.8-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE #0: Thu Apr 3
10:53:38 GMT 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
on a Toshiba Portege 7020CT notebook.
Everything works fine.
I recently looked at the supported hardware doc and found
mkisofs --- for creating iso's
burncd --- for ATAPI CDRW
cdrecord --- for SCSI CDRW, and SCSI emulation of ATAPI CDRW
--
With Best Regards,
Shantanoo Mahajan
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
)
locally. When I run netstat -rn, It seems the
network card is ok.
When I run tcpdump, I didn't show any output.
By the way, this network card is CNet PRO200. I was
thinking it was not recognize or supported by the
FreeBSD-4.8. When I checked FreeBSD-4.8's Hardware
Compatibility Lit, I didn't see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Two more questions. 4.8-RELEASE or 4.8_STABLE? I lost my 4.8-stable cd
and need to burn another one. What is the easiest way to burn an iso
file from freebsd?
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 14:34:38 -0400
C. Ulrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-29
. But I can ping
myself (FreeBSD) locally. When I run netstat -rn, It seems the network card is
ok.
When I run tcpdump, I didn't show any output. By the way, this network card is
CNet PRO200. I was thinking it was not recognize or supported by the FreeBSD-4.8.
When I checked FreeBSD
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 01:37, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
Howdy list,
I'm having trouble with my sio3 (/dev/cuaa3) port on one
of my servers (with an SMP kernel). When I try to `tip com4`
to a cisco switch using this port, I get only partial data,
and this appears in the logs:
messages:Oct 10
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 07:41:04AM -0400, nw1 wrote:
Neither mouse will work in the console or in XFree86.
Gigabyte GA-6BXDS = main board
BIOS= AWARD (2A69KG01) ver. 4.51PG
In the PCI/ISA section of the BIOS, a USB setting of: Assign IRQ For USB: Enabled
(is
set)
There is also a USB
Howdy list,
I'm having trouble with my sio3 (/dev/cuaa3) port on one
of my servers (with an SMP kernel). When I try to `tip com4`
to a cisco switch using this port, I get only partial data,
and this appears in the logs:
messages:Oct 10 17:18:37 billmax /kernel: sio3 at port 0x2e8-0x2ef irq 9 on
On Saturday, October 4, 2003, at 10:18 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Saturday, 4 October 2003 at 10:36:15 -0700, aarong wrote:
On Saturday, October 4, 2003, at 01:30 AM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
fstab: /etc/fstab:9: Inappropriate file type or format
It's probably worth fixing this.
I
I've successfully installed and converted a FreeBSD 4.8 install into a
bootable Vinum volume many times; however mirroring that volume onto a
second identical drive is proving difficult. Per Greg Lehey's
instructions in chapter 12 of The Complete FreeBSD 4th Edition, I've
setup a bootable
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
Computer output unwrapped.
On Saturday, 4 October 2003 at 0:17:44 -0700, aarong wrote:
I've successfully installed and converted a FreeBSD 4.8 install into a
bootable Vinum volume many times; however mirroring that volume
On Saturday, October 4, 2003, at 01:30 AM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
Computer output unwrapped.
Having seen that message in many of your replies on the lists, I went
out of my way to make sure Mail.app (the OS X mailer)
In the last episode (Oct 04), aarong said:
On Saturday, October 4, 2003, at 01:30 AM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
Computer output unwrapped.
Having seen that message in many of your replies on the lists, I went
out of my
On Saturday, 4 October 2003 at 10:36:15 -0700, aarong wrote:
On Saturday, October 4, 2003, at 01:30 AM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
Computer output unwrapped.
Having seen that message in many of your replies on the
On Saturday, 4 October 2003 at 10:36:15 -0700, aarong wrote:
On Saturday, October 4, 2003, at 01:30 AM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
I'd like to see the complaints. This is why I ask for the information
in the man page or at http://www.vinumvm.org/vinum/how-to-debug.html.
This is when
Dear Mr. Long,
during the last week or so, I've been trying to get more information
about the problem in 4.8-RELEASE that this thread has been about.
Yesterday, just when I thought that maybe I had some interesting data
worth sending to you, I noticed that 4.9-RC1 was out. So I tested for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was just wondering what people on the list thought. I don't want to
know any details on which is better or whatever just in general which is
better for whatever reasons people use it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
ok,
i am using 5.1 for 2 developemnt servers, 1 programming workstation. i.e: not
production, internal network behind firewall.
so, security and stability are not critical as far as i am concerened.
there is another important reason, my hardware tends to require later versions
of FreeBSD, for
At 2003-09-29T07:51:57Z, Bryan Cassidy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
which is better for whatever reasons people use it.
Define better - I'm not being facetious. If by better you mean faster
on common hardware and more stable, then you *probably* want 4.x. If you
mean has cool new features and
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 03:51, Bryan Cassidy wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was just wondering what people on the list thought. I don't want to
know any details on which is better or whatever just in general which is
better for whatever reasons people use it.
Short
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
