bsdtar --gname switch

2011-10-16 Thread Romain Garbage
Hi,

According to bsdtar(1) manpage, tar has a --gname switch that permits
to set an arbitrary groupname in the tar archive, but:
$ tar -cf test.tar --gname root test.sh
tar: Option --gname is not supported
Usage:
  List:tar -tf archive-filename
  Extract: tar -xf archive-filename
  Create:  tar -cf archive-filename [filenames...]
  Help:tar --help

I get the same error for --uname and --gid switches. I'm running
9.0-BETA3 (r226421). Did those switches used to work in previous
releases of FreeBSD ?

Regards,
Romain
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: bsdtar --gname switch

2011-10-16 Thread Adam Vande More
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Romain Garbage romain.garb...@gmail.comwrote:

 According to bsdtar(1) manpage, tar has a --gname switch that permits
 to set an arbitrary groupname in the tar archive, but:
 $ tar -cf test.tar --gname root test.sh
 tar: Option --gname is not supported
 Usage:
  List:tar -tf archive-filename
  Extract: tar -xf archive-filename
  Create:  tar -cf archive-filename [filenames...]
  Help:tar --help

 I get the same error for --uname and --gid switches. I'm running
 9.0-BETA3 (r226421). Did those switches used to work in previous
 releases of FreeBSD ?


No they didn't.  I suggest filing a PR and contacting the CURRENT list.

-- 
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: gname

2009-01-11 Thread Frank Staals

Grant Peel wrote:

Wow,

After a fresh install of FreeBSD 6.4, (with Xorg) I tried installing Gnome, and I get a 
stop during build, Filesystem Full!

Is Gname really that big? or did I miss doing something?

  
Well it is big, but since you are installing from a clean system all the 
gnome dependencies will also have to install their dependencies and so 
on. So basically you have to install a *lot* of ports which may take 
quite some space/time if you do not clean up nicely. Use 'make install 
clean' or 'make install distclean' to install your ports (if you didn't 
allready) that will order the make process to remove the files it uses 
during it's build (and distclean also cleans the downloaded distfiles in 
the distfiles dir )

 Doing a du -h -d1 on /usr shows

...
7.0G ports.
1.8G local

  
Check inside ports what is taking up the most space, most likely your 
distfiles dir is huge as well as the build directories inside a lot of 
ports itself. You can manually remove the distfiles for ports you 
allready installed from /usr/ports/distfiles. If that does not help 
enough also remove some of the work directories for the ports you 
installed allready but are not cleaned by make yet and resume your 
build. (so if for example you see gnome-session is allready installed ( 
pkg_info -Ex gnome ) remove /usr/ports/x11/gnome-session/work/ )


Regards,

--

- Frank

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: gname

2009-01-11 Thread RW
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:49:37 -0500
Grant Peel gp...@thenetnow.com wrote:

 Wow,
 
 After a fresh install of FreeBSD 6.4, (with Xorg) I tried installing
 Gnome, and I get a stop during build, Filesystem Full!
 
 Is Gname really that big? or did I miss doing something?
 
  Doing a du -h -d1 on /usr shows
 
 ...
 7.0G ports.
 1.8G local
 

The problem is that when you install something for the first time you
end up with a lot of cruft in the ports tree because all the work
directories for the dependencies get left-behind.  When you later
update Gnome with portupgrade (or whatever) the tool cleans as it
goes.  If you have portupgrade installed I would run portsclean -CD,
and start again. 

If /usr is on a separate partition, and you have a lot of space
elsewhere then I would suggest you either symlink /usr/ports there or
set WRKDIRPREFIX. Some desktop ports need huge amounts of temporary
space to build - it doesn't make much sense to allocate it  under /usr.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


gname

2009-01-10 Thread Grant Peel
Wow,

After a fresh install of FreeBSD 6.4, (with Xorg) I tried installing Gnome, and 
I get a stop during build, Filesystem Full!

Is Gname really that big? or did I miss doing something?

 Doing a du -h -d1 on /usr shows

...
7.0G ports.
1.8G local

df -h shows:

...
/dev/ad8s1e 9.7G(total)  9.6G(used) ... 108%  (usr)
...

Again, is gname really that big?

-Grant
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org