Re: iptables equivaelnt

2010-06-23 Thread krad
On 22 June 2010 20:36, Erik Norgaard norga...@locolomo.org wrote: On 21/06/10 20.06, pete wright wrote: On Jun 21, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote: I'm particuclary trying to implement some type of rate control as we are getting hammered by spam. I'd humbly suggest pf + spamd

Re: iptables equivaelnt

2010-06-22 Thread Erik Norgaard
On 21/06/10 20.06, pete wright wrote: On Jun 21, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote: I'm particuclary trying to implement some type of rate control as we are getting hammered by spam. I'd humbly suggest pf + spamd if you are concerned specifically about stopping spam, both are

iptables equivaelnt

2010-06-21 Thread Jean-Paul Natola
I'm looking for FREEBSD's equivalent of iptables I'm particuclary trying to implement some type of rate control as we are getting hammered by spam. Any and all help would be graetly appreciated ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: iptables equivaelnt

2010-06-21 Thread Chuck Swiger
Hi-- On Jun 21, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote: I'm looking for FREEBSD's equivalent of iptables I'm particuclary trying to implement some type of rate control as we are getting hammered by spam. The three major choices available with FreeBSD are documented here:

Re: iptables equivaelnt

2010-06-21 Thread pete wright
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote: Hi-- On Jun 21, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote: I'm looking for FREEBSD's equivalent of iptables I'm particuclary trying to implement some  type of rate control as we are getting hammered by spam. The three